SCP revision thread with Some BIG concept, NEP , regen stuff of SCP

[WeeklyBattles]

Also where does it say 682 has higher-d consciousness?
The entire profile only mentions 682 as a projection of True 682 into reality
say nothing with mind it's purely higher-d

From the Leviathan

 

[Rabbit2002]

From the Leviathan

leviathan? If you mean son of SK. Seriously, no
682 in Djoric's own work is just a weak kid among SK's children and nothing even says Higher-d Lol

 

[manu_zarri]

leviathan? If you mean son of SK. Seriously, no
682 in Djoric's own work is just a weak kid among SK's children and nothing even says Higher-d Lol

682 is stated to be a countless Dimensional being, but it's trapped in a 3D body

 

[Rabbit2002]

682 is stated to be a countless Dimensional being, but it's trapped in a 3D body

where?

 

[manu_zarri]

where?

wait a bit, let me find the soucre

 

[deonment]

No, just no 3930 does not wholly erase things from all levels of reality otherwise it would just wholly get rid of 682 no arguments allowed since it would erase even Swann's from your arguments which means that a)this is a massive massive ******* outlier b)3930 doesn't erase things at all levels of the narrative

 

[Agnaa]

Also where does it say 682 has higher-d consciousness?
The entire profile only mentions 682 as a projection of True 682 into reality
say nothing with mind it's purely higher-d

Note 2 on 682's profile

Note 2: Regarding SCP-682's immortality, 682 is a shell bound to the 3-D world by 343, but the shell itself is a projection of 682's former self that is generated by 682's higher-dimensional consciousness.

 

[Hl3_or_bust]

Yeah, no. Lacking a "meta construction" with 0 further elaboration means nothing, and especially not that it affects every narrative in the stack.

Also, I should note that Kaktus' idea of narratives is quite different from what basically everyone else on the site has them as: specifically, he describes them in a way that is a lot closer to just parallel universes and it's likely he uses the word metaphorically rather than literally, so even if the meta construction thing was solid, which it isn't, this wouldn't "scale" to anything important.

However, 682's regen should be upgraded to High-Godly from coming back from 3930, yes. That I can agree with and I'm a little confused as to how that wasn't already updated.

 

[deonment]

Also yeah i agree with high godly, since well it came back from being in a state similar to 3930, but not to the extent of the whole of 3930, it should also get limited subjective reality scaling off of 3930

 

[InfiniteDay]

Disagree with High-godly, everything else is fine.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

3930 and the pattern screamers do devour concepts, just throwing that out there

 

[deonment]

yes, and? it isnt conceptual regen we are scaling him to, it is narrative erase which he regened from

 

[WeeklyBattles]

I dont recall the pattern screamers ever having anything to do with narratives

 

[Rabbit2002]

I dont recall the pattern screamers ever having anything to do with narratives

3930

 

[Hl3_or_bust]

High-Godly would be from the conceptual erasure, not anything to do with narratives. 682 does have an entirely unrelated narrative immortality due to being a very popular character but that has absolutely nothing to do with pattern screamers, which also have nothing to do with narrative anything, at least in a way that actually matters.

 

[Rikimarox2]

narrative immortality due to being a very popular character

Imagine being immortal due to being popular.

Anyways, I kept actually hearing about Low 1-A/1-A immortality or smth, but I can't seem to find a scan for it. Could you possibly link the feat?

 

[Hl3_or_bust]

3930

You see, that page has been read over literally hundreds of times by the main SCP revision group, and the only possible relation to narratives, that being the screamer lacking a "meta construction", has been concluded to both not definitively relate to anything narrative based but would also be a massive outlier if it somehow did.

@Rikimarox2

I don't know of any Low 1-A stuff from 682, just 1-A from narrative stuff that doesn't scale to anyone else. iirc this is from an Operation Overmeta page on the SCP wiki, if you're interested.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

I don't know of any Low 1-A stuff from 682, just 1-A from narrative stuff that doesn't scale to anyone else. iirc this is from an Operation Overmeta page on the SCP wiki, if you're interested.

Low 1-A comes from 4455 failing to kill 682 with its narrative hax

 

[Agnaa]

Anyways, I kept actually hearing about Low 1-A/1-A immortality or smth, but I can't seem to find a scan for it. Could you possibly link the feat?

It's all prolly best described as resistance to plot manip/concept manip. If any of it can be described as type 8 immortality, it's not combat applicable, since they just have some part of themselves alive in a narrative plane somewhere that can't return to the battlefield.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

It's all prolly best described as resistance to plot manip/concept manip. If any of it can be described as type 8 immortality, it's not combat applicable, since they just have some part of themselves alive in a narrative plane somewhere that can't return to the battlefield.

What about the thing with the Swan avatar bringing 682 back?

 

[Agnaa]

I don't remember that. I only remember Swann avatars buffing 682 instead of removing it.

 

[InfiniteDay]

Oh, can you link where it happens, or maybe a screenshot?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Experiment Log T-98816-OC108/682 - SCP Foundation

The SCP Foundation's 'top-secret' archives, declassified for your enjoyment.

www.scpwiki.com

 

[Rabbit2002]

Bump

 

[InfiniteDay]

Isn't this already being discussed in your Part 1 revisions?