- 3,461
- 1,724
What you mentioned, obviously.what are you reffering?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What you mentioned, obviously.what are you reffering?
Who is him?Just ignore him
YouWho is him?
could anyone here look it overBehold a 23 SCP CRT
why did I do this
I don't see a male here, i'm afraid.
Gender assumption at its finest.I don't see a male here, i'm afraid.
"After 5 hours of having its neck snapped" is ambiguous in its meaning. Couldn't it just mean the containment breach happened 5 hours after SCP-173 broke SCP-096's bones?"SCP-173 was exposed to SCP-096 and successfully broke its spine into two pieces between the fourth and fifth vertebrae."
The image of a hole ripped into the side of a metal wall appears on the screen behind Dr. Daniels.
"Of course after 5 hours of having its neck snapped, things went a little sideways. But recovery was accomplished fairly quickly. And you are now one step closer to being able to punish me. Congratulations."
Why is it stated that Consequences and Collarbones showed SCP-173 took several hours to break SCP-096's bones? The passage in question:
"After 5 hours of having its neck snapped" is ambiguous in its meaning. Couldn't it just mean the containment breach happened 5 hours after SCP-173 broke SCP-096's bones?
"Of course after 5 hours of having its neck snapped, things went a little sideways. But recovery was accomplished fairly quickly. And you are now one step closer to being able to punish me. Congratulations."
SCP-096 doesn't have an High 8-C rating since it wasn't implied that it attacked SCP-173.That doesn't explain anything. "SCP-096 had its neck snapped for 5 hours" could either mean "SCP-173 took 5 hours to break SCP-096's bones" or "SCP-096 lay around with a snapped neck for 5 hours".
??? SCP-096's durability is what I'm talking about.SCP-096 doesn't have an High 8-C rating since it wasn't implied that it attacked SCP-173.
Seeing as how SCP-173 was exposed to SCP-096 as explained in the article implies that the shy guy did fight it physically.??? SCP-096's durability is what I'm talking about.
Your comments are becoming increasingly incomprehensible relative to my original question.Seeing as how SCP-173 was exposed to SCP-096 as explained in the article implies that the shy guy did fight it physically.
Why are curious about it then? do you want to make a CRT about it? from the looks of it, nothing needs to be discussed.Your comments are becoming increasingly incomprehensible relative to my original question.
Whatever for now. I'll bring this up when I've thought about it more.Why are curious about it then? do you want to make a CRT about it? from the looks of it, nothing needs to be discussed.
ohHere's my take on the current situation:
I dont think this can be used at all.is there anything new?because about the giant ''knowledge thing''
Not only is there still, but they are already beginning to debate whether it should be removed, although there is only one that says "it doesn't make sense" and the person who did it explains why it does make sense.
more or less,the arguments of the guy who wants that to eliminated are ''that does make sense''and the other is ''explains how it make sense in the context of the article''Log of Extranormal Events, Vol I - SCP Foundation
The SCP Foundation's 'top-secret' archives, declassified for your enjoyment.scp-wiki.wikidot.com
scp cosmology does not contradict itself, in fact literally whatever form of scp cosmology we have is just as it is from our ''objective'' point of view.I dont think this can be used at all.
Not only it would contradict the current cosmology, it also endagered this verse in the wiki even more.
Unless somthing similar happened in some article that written by well-known authors of SCP wiki, which, I doubt it will happens anytime soon.
I mean it’s literally copy and pasted from CN Branch. So it doesn’t make sense honestlyis there anything new?because about the giant ''knowledge thing''
Not only is there still, but they are already beginning to debate whether it should be removed, although there is only one that says "it doesn't make sense" and the person who did it explains why it does make sense.
more or less,the arguments of the guy who wants that to eliminated are ''that does make sense''and the other is ''explains how it make sense in the context of the article''Log of Extranormal Events, Vol I - SCP Foundation
The SCP Foundation's 'top-secret' archives, declassified for your enjoyment.scp-wiki.wikidot.com
where?can you send a link or somethingI mean it’s literally copy and pasted from CN Branch. So it doesn’t make sense honestly
where?can you send a link or something
It was going to happen, let’s be honestSo apparently, SCP 0=1 and such, was deleted.
ProbablyThe quote really felt like someone wanted to include modal realism, type 4 multiverse and large cardinals all in one single quote. That's probably why they didn't wanna make a short story so they went to log of extranormal events just to not waste time making a full length story....
wooo???wait,selfiros?I did recently find out that the guy that made it is actually a friend of mine.
what?
Made me think Part 5 came out bruh
Nah, Selfiros seems to be writing his own canon from what i understand.wooo???wait,selfiros?
wait,what did he did?what happen,did he troll usMade me think Part 5 came out bruh
Nah, Selfiros seems to be writing his own canon from what i understand.
To bring more attention to it?@Kirinator07 why do you link admonition when i mentioned?
ok,but for what reason?we already read that,i read it like 20 timesTo bring more attention to it?
Who's we in this discussion, there doesn't need to be a reason that's all.ok,but for what reason?we already read that,i read it like 20 times
okWho's we in this discussion, there doesn't need to be a reason that's all.
it was not accepted?Why is my calc for Anastasis in the Calculations and feats section of the SCP Foundation verse page?