- 15,872
- 8,976
It's probably getting deleted after a quality check because that grammar is horrible and if we're being honest, no "real" SCP author namedrops narratives without hyperlinking Swann's article or any other pataphysics article.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
SCP Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Lou_change
- Start date
-
- Tags
- scp foundation
- 6,147
- 2,292
you're right, unless I somehow fix it (which I doubt)
- 5,274
- 2,174
How so? It literally has 600+ upvotes
- 6,147
- 2,292
the article is the same thing that have 600 upvotes,but is like scp-914 test and scp-682 test,they are multiple of them,and if they are not done right,then they will be deleted,if this write is not deleted in the span of,like the next month,then is probably usable(i say this)
- 5,274
- 2,174
How old is the article?
- 2,140
- 2,079
WoD bros and B&W bros...It's over...
- 6,147
- 2,292
That will only happen if writing (which takes about 3 days) is not deleted, if it is not deleted in the next week, or month.
it will mean that it is valid
- 5,274
- 2,174
But how long has been this article on the wiki though?
- 6,147
- 2,292
i am reffering to the writing on that specific script,because the article is divided in multiples scripts of multiple people,and the writing has existed for like 3 days,and the article for like 1 or 2 years
- 5,274
- 2,174
Oh, I see
- 2,140
- 2,079
Seems to be the Chinese branch cosmology with the whole “Narrative echelons"
- 5,274
- 2,174
Yeah, it really does.
Even with the whole mention of large cardinals.
Kirinator07
He/Him- 2,193
- 446
It hasn't been three days, keep waiting.
- 5,274
- 2,174
What is the time that this can get deleted?
Like, it can get deleted anytime or after a certain period of time?
- 6,147
- 2,292
like i say,at least a month
- 2,280
- 1,231
- 5,274
- 2,174
No, i meant if it takes a certain amount of time to get this log deleted or it just happens randomly?
- 5,274
- 2,174
0=1 layers into tier 0 SCP-3812 and scarlet king lol
- 6,147
- 2,292
i mean,if the admins found it,or it will be deleted or changed(i will go for a change)
- 5,274
- 2,174
Like completely or just grammar?
- 6,147
- 2,292
that's the problem, it's possible to remove the grammatical errors or remove it completely, it depends on the scp admins
- 5,274
- 2,174
I hope they will just change grammar
- 6,147
- 2,292
hope for luck
- 2,280
- 1,231
It has over 600 votes, it's way better to change the grammar than erasing it
- 5,274
- 2,174
Well, the whole thing has 600+ votes not just that new log.
- 709
- 189
I leave DT's talk about axiom 0=1 to the brainrot guys.
- 5,274
- 2,174
What? lol that's hilarious because SRE scales to 0=1 but apparently it dosen't by your logic so yeah.
Also, scp mentions Reinhardt and Barkeley cardinals as well so it doesn’t matter.
- 709
- 189
I haven't found any mathematical expressions for set theory. What I really need is a "Latex system"proof of the stupidity of the narrative.
- 5,274
- 2,174
What are you talking about? It doesn't need to talk or even mention shit like that to be tiered.
- 709
- 189
Bruh. Let's go to CRT and prove to me that you can do it
- 5,274
- 2,174
I don't need to prove anything. That's just not how teiring system works lol
- 5,274
- 2,174
What are you on about?
Salem
They/Them- 11
- 4
This blatant tiershit is a recent edit, it's obviously somebody trying to upscale the SCP verse, it will most definitely be deleted soon due to it's terrible quality of both writing and grammar.
More like SCP is getting nuked off the wiki, if this stays it would prove a lot of arguments against SCP being here.
Kirinator07
He/Him- 2,193
- 446
Didn't we already mention that? no need to repeat it.
Similar threads
