- 12,824
- 3,983
The Scp wiki became a shithole, goddamn.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obviously depends on the writer, but if you mean on the whole, there has been a much, much greater amount of change simply for the sake of it. I obviously don't mean change itself is an inherently bad thing, but there has been a very large number of cases that essentially consist of "get rid of/fundamentally alter this extremely long withstanding SCP because eh **** it/lol i dunno", which doesn't really help the overall coherency of the site.Agnaa said:@Azathoth What are the new changes with the writing mentality? I haven't actually been keeping up with much meta stuff about the SCPwiki.
When the Beyonder was retconned, you could still go back and read Secret Wars II, were you so inclined.Sir Ovens said:Let's be fair, the Foundation isn't the only verse that has revisions every other week.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Azathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:When the Beyonder was retconned, you could still go back and read Secret Wars II, were you so inclined.
He was not removed entirely from every other comic he was in, nor was it actively made more difficult to find out information about what he was like pre-Retcon.
This is the issue with just replacing skips entirely.
I disagree with their standards being higher. I fully agree that their standards are different than what they once were, but I do not think that necessarily makes them higher or lower. That is of course due more in part to a change in management than anything explicitly written out.Agnaa said:I don't think they're doing it because change is fun, but because they think their standards now are higher than in the past, and they want to raise the articles up while keeping the article's soul intact.
It's mainly the recent takedowns that have made things complex, and if this situation escalates, we'll be getting more of that.Agnaa said:Of course, with some prolific SCP writers liking articles like 682 more than many popular ones in the 3000s, but they're not just shooting random articles with the rewrite gun.
We were already writing rules for stuff like this, and they're even being posted soon.Agnaa said:I think it should be treated as a one-off event and not something that should be planned around or have rules written for.
SCP-1143 SCP-1233 SCP-1255 SCP-1313 SCP-1444 SCP-1548 SCP-1548-CU SCP-1654 SCP-1701 SCP-1822 SCP-1917 SCP-2008 SCP-2117 SCP-2202 SCP-2302 SCP-2444 SCP-2544 SCP-2601 SCP-2722 and its supplement, Recovered Materials SCP-DEALS-JAgnaa said:I don't want us writing rules which hinder how we treat our profiles, just because once every 2 years a few SCPs get deleted by their authors.
Try doing reserchs on your phone and you will understand my plight also , im only asking of the possiblty of it haveing a profileWokistan said:Cain you know you're allowed to make profiles yourself right? As long as they're well researched and up to the quality standard, adding profiles is encouraged. I like to make them in blogs before they're done, so I don't have to do it all in one sitting like I ended up doing for my first two.
Seeing as both were written by The Great Hippo, both would count towards the original canon.Agnaa said:What should be considered the original file for a character like Murphy Law, who first appeared in another SCP's page before appearing in an SCP file of its ow?
34, if I'm not mistaken.Phoenix821 said:How many 1-B's does that make?
Considering:Cain Fastus said:Quick Question!
Would SCP 682 surviving Dr.Clefs Proposal attack would grants hime a new tier?
Damm it!Agnaa said:Considering:Cain Fastus said:Quick Question!
Would SCP 682 surviving Dr.Clefs Proposal attack would grants hime a new tier?
1. The experiment log hasn't been purged of bad entries since it was added.
2. That experiment specifically had people looking at it to be rewritten/removed.
3. It would be an obscene outlier.
No, it wouldn't grant him a new tier.
Usually they go to other numbers. So either somewhere in the 3000s or 4000s.Cain Fastus said:Wonder what happen to the SCP 4000 entires that didnt win