- 8,845
- 9,506
Yes.Really?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.Really?
this is all the exact same shit. none of this is any different. You are literally saying the same thing but with different words"Saitama called one of them a good opponent and the other a baby splashing water in a tub"
"Saitama treated the monster king like a child while he called Released Boros strong at least once."
"Orochi believes he is now strong enough to beat someone who could nearly kill him previously. Saitama is far more powerful in every capacity, but what he used against Orochi was nowhere near his full strength or effort—even the level he used against Boros with a Serious Punch doesn't come close. So Orochi believes he can now defeat someone far more powerful than his previous self."
"The gap between Orochi and Released Boros is described as a bratty child in a bath tub and a person actually worth paying attention to."
"released Boros is stronger than Orochi, as Saitama rated Boros as ''too strong'' while he treated orochi like a child playing in a tub"
"Saitama thought Orochi was nothing more than a rude kid who splashed water in a bath. Meanwhile Saitama complimented Boros multiple times which is something he has said to no one else even this far into the series.""The reasoning for Boros scaling above Orochi is due to Saitama regarding Boros as "strong twice in their fight, when he didn't bat an eye to Orochi, and even called him a child"
"Boros's feat could be far higher due to the CSRC actually hitting the ship instead of the surface and the fact that surface destruction could be much stronger than just High 6-A"
"Boros feat didnt even happend first of all, Saitama deflected it, the attack can wipe out the earth surface, but the way to do it can varies from High 6-A to even 5-A"
Yeah sorry literally every other verse needs to deal with using the 183 petaton calc OPM isn't special"Boros' feat is only a vague statement and in no case should it be used to discredit other feats, surface destruction can be as high as High 5-A depending on how fast it is done. The 183 petatons calc is the lowest possible way to calculate Boros' feat; it would take a lot of time to destroy the surface according to it."
"The High 6-A calc Boros is a lowball. And we were never able to see the true power of Boros ' attack."
I just carried over the arguments from the One punch man thread, I thought it might be useful to better situate this debate;this is all the exact same shit. none of this is any different. You are literally saying the same thing but with different words
Already been explained in the thread
Yeah sorry literally every other verse needs to deal with using the 183 petaton calc OPM isn't special
and so planet busting can be as high as low 4-C but we don't assume that a planet busting statement is low 4-C
yeah you don't spam the same argument ten timesI just carried over the arguments from the One punch man thread, I thought it might be useful to better situate this debate;
I already know there are counterarguments, so don't **** up.
The rating after High 3-A is Low 2-C, which you did in fact suggest yourself, and not 2-C.Yes, but Saitama is stronger than infinity, which means he is 2-C
Scaling Melzargard/Geryuganshoop/Groribas to Orochi based on Murata stating they stand no chance against him is poor logic.The Gery, Melz, and Gror scaling still hasn't been addressed.
Also, Boros is the only character in OPM to be officially above dragon. Murata just said he thinks Orochi would be above dragon level.
1. It's s stement that has been accepted and is noted on the wiki.Scaling Melzargard/Geryuganshoop/Groribas to Orochi based on Murata stating they stand no chance against him is poor logic.
Geryu damaging the ship is Anime-only.
I don't understand how the evaporation of the bark gave you a result of 90 exaton. Show me the calculation.Doing a quick calc, vaporizing the crust 30 kilometers down would be 93.758766730401535034 Exatons of tnt, not even including the oceans, so in reality, it's 94.7587667 Exatons of tnt or Moon Level.
Yes, I know, but what are you going to do to me?The rating after High 3-A is Low 2-C, which you did in fact suggest yourself, and not 2-C.
That was simply using the vaporization value, and then using the hollow sphere volume calculator. It is probably lower when you use the appropriate elements.I don't understand how the evaporation of the bark gave you a result of 90 exaton. Show me the calculation.
My version, where I used absolutely the entire bark and split it into elements, has half the result
Not yet. We should get a real CSRC calc before we make any drastic changes. And I still have problems with Orochi being = or > MB Boros.So... Have we come to a conclusion on this topic?
Nothing really. I'm just pointing something out that I noticed.Yes, I know, but what are you going to do to me?
Yeah, I don't think anyone can really dispute that. If nothing else does, that pretty much solidifies Boros is > Orochi.But no one disputed the fact that Boros is a true level of disaster above dragon and Orochi is a Dragon for One.
In fact, we don't even know Orochi's real threat level. What is shown in the manga refers to his restrained version, while Murata's quote referred to the version before the redraw.Yeah, I don't think anyone can really dispute that. If nothing else does, that pretty much solidifies Boros is > Orochi.
Oof. Where does that leave Orochi?In fact, we don't even know Orochi's real threat level. What is shown in the manga refers to his restrained version, while Murata's quote referred to the version before the redraw.
Bro he doesn't even scale to Gaia Cannon, he scales to the earthquakes he created from pulling the energy.Also his Gai Canon is drawing energy from the Earth's core, and adding it to his own, so it's somewhat unfair to scale to his normal AP.
Well one of the main points is CSRC is < than Gai Canon.The CSRC calc is irrelevant to the actual topic of this thread.
That's kind of what I was thinking given the context.Dragon or Above doesn't exist in universe. So there is literally no way for Orochi to be considered that unless we get another author statement, which is highly unlikely since he already said he was Dragon or Above before the redraws.
What are even the major points brought up in this thread, It's very disorganized, and incoherent.
This has been sufficiently addressed as well.Disaster Level scaling
The latest is 6-A+. But the gap between it and baseline High 6-A is 1.67x. No upscalingIn such a case we must downgrage Boros before his own exploits. As far as I remember, his last MB calculation was 6-A, which can be scaled up to a High 6-A baseline.
Catching up with the thread, sorry if this point was dropped.Since it is allowed here to say "bullshit" about a person's statement, then in my heart I don’t give a **** what kind of evidence is needed here? Orochi's casting effect is 5 Exatons.
The newest calculation for Boros' strongest attack is 1 exaton. I would still understand if only MB was scaled, but we are talking about RB, which showed absolutely nothing.
Link does not workThe latest is 6-A+. But the gap between it and baseline High 6-A is 1.67x. No upscaling
In fact, the difference between the feats is not so great. In fact, they act on the same amount of mass (>10^22 kg). Only in one case it is destruction, and in the other it is a rise of hundreds of kilometers.Catching up with the thread, sorry if this point was dropped.
But that's the worst argument I've seen to stop scaling.
Hey, here's a thought: Narrative isn't entitled to fan calculations. Not even close.
and you can't really argue "portrayal", because shaving off the surface of the Earth would be a MUCH, MUCH more impressive visually than pulling a piece of focken magma from the core.
Narratively, Saitama considers Boros stronger than Orochi. Our math is nearly irrelevant here.
If Boros had only shown City level feats, we'd be having a different conversation.
Same applies if Saitama were to fight some 2-C character, we wouldn't backscale because it would not make sense, narratively, and mathematically.
Oh, so you did drop the point.In fact, the difference between the feats is not so great. In fact, they act on the same amount of mass (>10^22 kg). Only in one case it is destruction, and in the other it is a rise of hundreds of kilometers.