- 1,511
- 126
Raditz hit Piccolo, and he was fine.Kepekley23 said:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Saitama vs Raditz
- Thread starter Oloserian
- Start date
- Status
- 15,332
- 7,563
The Special Beam Cannon is an amplified attack.
By the way, it has the feats to kill Saitama, since it went through Raditz (who tanked an above baseline 5-B attack) like he was made of styrofoam.
Saitama probably has the AP advantage. Raditz has the speed and durability advantage. So my vote is still on him.
By the way, it has the feats to kill Saitama, since it went through Raditz (who tanked an above baseline 5-B attack) like he was made of styrofoam.
Saitama probably has the AP advantage. Raditz has the speed and durability advantage. So my vote is still on him.
- 12,239
- 1,112
Except if Saitama has the ap advantage he has the durability advantage .
- 15,332
- 7,563
A Saiyan's durability >>> their AP
Already posted a feat.
Already posted a feat.
- 12,239
- 1,112
Did Ya? Not that that matters, Saitama can withstand his own punches, punches that would paint the area with baseline 5-B fighters. While not even trying .
- 15,332
- 7,563
And Raditz can tank Piccolo's second strongest attack (which is >> his casual ki blasts) without a scratch and laugh it off as dust. What's your point?
- 12,239
- 1,112
That still isn't even comparable? That is my point .
- 210
- 28
Saitama FRA
- 15,332
- 7,563
Tanking an attack that would vaporize a baseline 5-B isn't comparable to an attack that wasn't even pulverization? What?
- 15,332
- 7,563
Vote is still solidly on Raditz. He has the durability, speed, and skills advantage, while Saitama has the AP advantage.
- 12,239
- 1,112
When did raditz tank an attack that would vaporise a baseline 5-B?
And >making flesh, bone and organs the consistency of water. >below pulveruzation .
With love taps basically .
And >making flesh, bone and organs the consistency of water. >below pulveruzation .
With love taps basically .
- 15,332
- 7,563
When he tanked Piccolo's second strongest ki blast. As shown in the Boo Arc, the Z Fighters's ki blasts vaporize their enemies.
Making flesh, bone and organs the consistency of water is considerably below pulverization.
Making flesh, bone and organs the consistency of water is considerably below pulverization.
- 12,239
- 1,112
And? Actually? Yeah it can vaporise, now prove it'll vaporise someone on par with him .
Still > what raditz can do. With zero effort .
Still > what raditz can do. With zero effort .
- 15,332
- 7,563
1. Piccolo vaporized Boo, who was >> him.
Also, that's a strawman. When did I ever say Raditz could vaporize Saitama? I'm talking about Raditz tanking Piccolo's blast.
2. Raditz can vaporize baseline 5-Bs with ki blasts.
Also, that's a strawman. When did I ever say Raditz could vaporize Saitama? I'm talking about Raditz tanking Piccolo's blast.
2. Raditz can vaporize baseline 5-Bs with ki blasts.
- 6,594
- 1,713
Saitama is casually planet level. Piccolo is also casually planet level (not to the extent of Saitama) Raditz stomps 2 casual planet busters. I'm going with him.
- 12,239
- 1,112
And? Buu changes his consistency constantly, bullets can dent him if he does not care enough.
Luckily I did not state raditz would vaporise saitama then.
Asked ya to prove saud attack he tanked could vaporise baselines not him.
>never happened .
Luckily I did not state raditz would vaporise saitama then.
Asked ya to prove saud attack he tanked could vaporise baselines not him.
>never happened .
- 12,239
- 1,112
Light, boros was planet and saitan a brutally kicked his ass and killed him like thousands times over if not for his healing .
This case has boros and piccolo being comparable, not saitama and piccolo .
This case has boros and piccolo being comparable, not saitama and piccolo .
- 15,332
- 7,563
Boo was facing SSjin Gotenks (an opponent far above SSjin3 Goku) and tanking his attacks. Therefore, he cared enough.
Luckily I didn't say that either. I did say his durability was higher based off feats, though.
The Z Senshi's attacks can vaporize enemies even with normal ki blasts. Therefore, it stands to reason Piccolo's Bakuriki Maha is vaporization
I also want you to prove it's "far beyond what Saitama has ever done". Raditz tanks attacks that can vaporize 5-Bs without a scratch. You have no proof Saitama's durability is higher.
I'm starting to think Raditz has the AP advantage via ki blasts again.
Luckily I didn't say that either. I did say his durability was higher based off feats, though.
The Z Senshi's attacks can vaporize enemies even with normal ki blasts. Therefore, it stands to reason Piccolo's Bakuriki Maha is vaporization
I also want you to prove it's "far beyond what Saitama has ever done". Raditz tanks attacks that can vaporize 5-Bs without a scratch. You have no proof Saitama's durability is higher.
I'm starting to think Raditz has the AP advantage via ki blasts again.
- 6,594
- 1,713
Piccolo oneshotted the Moon with a onehanded, uncharged ki blast, with weights restricting his power on. Piccolo is definitely casually planet level.TheJ-ManRequiem said:
- 15,332
- 7,563
Piccolo >> Boros.
Boros's Planet-level attack was a suicide attack. Piccolo's was a ki blast he did on the fly with absolute no charge-up time.
The fact that Boros has to kill himself to reproduce something LOWER than what Piccolo did to the moon with a casual, uncharged ki-blast should tell you Piccolo can possibly one-shot Boros.
Boros's Planet-level attack was a suicide attack. Piccolo's was a ki blast he did on the fly with absolute no charge-up time.
The fact that Boros has to kill himself to reproduce something LOWER than what Piccolo did to the moon with a casual, uncharged ki-blast should tell you Piccolo can possibly one-shot Boros.
- 1,511
- 126
Yeah, just because Piccolo did something in the Buu Saga doesn't mean he could do it in the Saiyan Saga.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Piccolo used a ki blast to vaporize something. It stands to reason he could use a ki blast to vaporize no matter what the arc, provided that he has enough of a power-advantage over whatever he's trying to vap.
- 12,239
- 1,112
I'd sooner argue that piccolo was approaching him in power or outlier .
The feat is based off an inherently flawed assumption .
Yeah? Of course the attacks vaporise , problem being sure as hell do not vaporise comparable fighters, otherwise every fight would be over in one attack.
Which leads into that, yeah the attack can vaporise, but not anything like himself, Goku or raditz at the time.
In fact that implies the gap between piccolo and raditz was larger than piccolo and super buu. Because that would be the case.
Yeah piccolo did one shot the moon with a normal blast. Saitama one shot the roaring cannon, dispersed it completely, killed boros and the excess energy split clouds on a planetary scale, casually, while still not trying .
The feat is based off an inherently flawed assumption .
Yeah? Of course the attacks vaporise , problem being sure as hell do not vaporise comparable fighters, otherwise every fight would be over in one attack.
Which leads into that, yeah the attack can vaporise, but not anything like himself, Goku or raditz at the time.
In fact that implies the gap between piccolo and raditz was larger than piccolo and super buu. Because that would be the case.
Yeah piccolo did one shot the moon with a normal blast. Saitama one shot the roaring cannon, dispersed it completely, killed boros and the excess energy split clouds on a planetary scale, casually, while still not trying .
- 1,511
- 126
First off, not really. Secondly, even if this were true, it would be completely irrelevent, considering Piccolo is only baseline, so he wouldn't have an AP advantage aganist any other 5-B.Kepekley23 said:
- 15,332
- 7,563
Anyway, I'm starting to think Raditz has the AP advantage again. His punches are not as powerful, but he has ki blasts that could vap Piccolo and Goku (and both are slightly above bsaseline)
- 12,239
- 1,112
Except he didnt and failed.
And Saitama could also kill piccolo .
And Saitama could also kill piccolo .
- 15,332
- 7,563
A near-miss of Raditz's ki blast vaporized Piccolo's arm, so actually he kinda proved he could vaporize baseline 5-Bs...
So Raditz has the AP, durability and speed advantage lol. My vote is on him with even more reasons.
So Raditz has the AP, durability and speed advantage lol. My vote is on him with even more reasons.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Because people believed Saitama could one-shot earlier on.
He obviously can't, given Raditz's better durability feats, but I guess.
He obviously can't, given Raditz's better durability feats, but I guess.
- 12,239
- 1,112
Kepekley, prove that the ki blasts would vaporise piccolo or goku.
Currently your basis boils diwn to ki blasts having sone durability ignoring asoect vua vaporisation, wgen ki bkasts onky vaporise when the attack in question is far above the target enough that it would vaporise anyway. Plus one feat in the buu saga that puts piccolo at super buu tier.
Currently your basis boils diwn to ki blasts having sone durability ignoring asoect vua vaporisation, wgen ki bkasts onky vaporise when the attack in question is far above the target enough that it would vaporise anyway. Plus one feat in the buu saga that puts piccolo at super buu tier.
- 12,239
- 1,112
Did it vaporise his arm? Picture ?
- 15,332
- 7,563
Kepekley23 said:
- 1,511
- 126
It didn't vaporize it, it just destroyed it.Kepekley23 said:
- 15,332
- 7,563
Which is still pulverization, and thus above what Saitama did.
Argument still stands.
Argument still stands.
- Status
Similar threads
