Rule Violations Reports - 66

[Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan]

I say he should be banned from making profiles for a short period of time like a month or two, and during that period of time he would have to make them in his sandbox or a blog, and only publish them when they are reviewed by staff members (kinda like calcs). So he can both learn to make profiles better and not make any dumb profiles and bother staff members at the same time.

I don't think he should be banned, at most for a week, as he doesn't seem malicious at all.

 

[Super_Saiyan_God_Julian]

I, of course, disagree with banning him and fully agree with Spino's suggestion.

Obviously if he doesn't respect our decision and continues making profiles afterwards, then he should be banned (not permanently though).

 

[Antvasima]

I am fine with if he is forbidden from making any further profiles. I am uncertain for how long that should last though.

 

[AKM sama]

6 months I think. Any legitimate profiles he wants to make during this time can be go into his sandboxes or blogs. If he shapes up after that, he can be permitted again.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. That seems fine to me. Feel free to give him this restriction.

 

[Moritzva]

Honestly, Dee and I wanted to make pages for bad books sometime anyways.

... but we're going to do it right, dammit!

I agree with the above.

 

[The_Impress]

they're not bad books, apologize you pretentious elitist

Obviously agreeing to the above

 

[DarkGrath]

The user IHunterlol has made the Patity page, had it deleted, and then proceeded to remake it with none of the content except for the standard format.

I've given them an unofficial warning about it already, but if this goes any further, then further action should be taken.

 

[Elizhaa]

Ok, I think further action should be taken.

IHunterlol recently remade the Patity profile after given instructions not to do so his message; I just recently deleted it.

 

[GyroNutz]

I can give him an official warning not to do that?

 

[DarkGrath]

I think he should receive an official warning after having made it again, immediately after it was deleted and he was warned.

 

[Andytrenom]

Warning is fine, honestly his behaviour is suspect but I won't push for a ban yet

 

[DarkGrath]

After his responses to his prior warning, I'm almost positive he's just confused rather than trolling or malicious. I wouldn't push for a ban.

 

[GyroNutz]

Yeah no need to ban him right now.

 

[Elizhaa]

Yeah, an official warning is fine.

GyroNutz handled it.

 

[Faruel1998]

Report https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:IHunterlol

He continues to edit Sindel's tier without doing a CTR first

 

[ZephyrosOmega]

WTF High 8-A isn't even a tier

This has the same energy as the random comicvine and youtubers who apply low and high to random tiers to make them seem stronger than they were like that guy who called Aizen "Low multi-galaxy level"

 

[DarkGrath]

What...

Alright, clearly he's not getting the point.

 

[The_Wright_Way]

I've posted a warning. We'll see how/if he responds.

 

[Elizhaa]

Report https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:IHunterlol
He continues to edit Sindel's tier without doing a CTR first

I reverted the edit.

@The Wright Way , I am willing to wait.

 

[The_Wright_Way]

She should be High 8-C, not 8-A. She only svales to Large Building Level characters.

 

[Elizhaa]

My first edit didn't save; the tier is correctly reverted now.

 

[The_Wright_Way]

Wait, both you and this guy here claim to have been the one to revert back to 8-A, before I told you to change it to High 8-C: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/4188016?useskin=oasis

Edit: Nevermind, I see what happened.

 

[Super_Saiyan_God_Julian]

If he continues to ignore our warnings, then he must be banned I'm afraid, although if we do ban him, it should be short.

 

[Antvasima]

A brief ban to make him listen seems like a good idea if he continues, yes.

 

[Wokistan]

There was already a thread made on his wall to notify him, shouldn't any back and forth on the issue be there as opposed to the rule violations thread?>

 

[Antvasima]

@Wokistan

Yes. Agreed.

 

[BigSmoke4269]

I asked there first. I didn't get a response, though. So I came here.

 

[Ogbunabali]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:The_Unbeatable_guy

This is the same guy previously that kept uploading that turtle profile, he's made a sock now and uploaded it again. So he should probably be banned.

 

[Ogbunabali]

Oh and speaking of his previous account he said the n-word so he should probably be ip banned.

 

[Super_Saiyan_God_Julian]

Yes I agree. He should definitely be banned and IP blocked.

 

[Elizhaa]

I blocked IHunterlol and The Unbeatable guy.

 

[Elizhaa]

I deleted The Unbeatable guy's posts.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for helping out.

 

[ProfessorKukui4Life]

Oh and speaking of his previous account he said the n-word so he should probably be ip banned.

Im sorry I just wanted to point out one thing. Does saying the n-word = an IP block?

Because Prince, despite being permabanned, said the n word multiple times when being exposed with more than 1 sock and hasnt gotten IP blocked yet. So if the punishment fits the crime in this case, I think Prince also needs to be IP blocked.

 

[Schnee_One]

Yes they are

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

Yeah, using the n-word on Fandom, especially as an insult would warrant a global ban.

 

[Elizhaa]

Prince was IP blocked when he got banned.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes. IP blocks usually need to be given a range to be somewhat effective, but can still be circumvented with many VPNs.

 

[Wokistan]

We usually block the IP by default on blocks, it's checkmarked regularly iirc.