• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Being this the case can you guys spare him and maybe each of the members with a warning. I think Ryzen is just extremely frustrated.
I'd be content to grant leniency as well, for the record, although given that his complaint seems to be that this is to be regarded as a negative thing at all, I'm uncertain he would accept. It's his choice, though.
 
How did this happen...?

Had to have been way too tired or something because I could've sworn I sent the right thread. Anyways, here's the report
Ah.

Yeah, I vaguely recall that. It's still a 2023 offense so I personally still feel a light ban is all that is necessary, acknowledging that more offenses in the future would obviously yield greater bans.
 
Being this the case can you guys spare him and maybe each of the members with a warning. I think Ryzen is just extremely frustrated.
If he changes his mind, he can request that we undo his ban via my, Bambu's, or Medeus' message wall. However, I think that Bambu mentioned a two weeks ban before he can return. 🙏
 
I don't know if this violates any rules, but this question was made that somewhat feels... deep enough to the point where it may even be suicidal, especially since OP isn't clear if they mean fictional characters or actual users.
Yeah, I don't think that's really an appropriate question to ask, nuked
 
Could some staff help calm things down in this thread? I think everyone is a bit extra because of election day.
I went on a mass delete spree, there may have been a few posts not so bad, but it's best to nuke everything related to the topic for safety reasons.
 
I don't know if this violates any rules, but this question was made that somewhat feels... deep enough to the point where it may even be suicidal, especially since OP isn't clear if they mean fictional characters or actual users.
I have sent them a message in private in case they need someone to talk with. 🙏❤️
 
Here we go again...

 
I have received a ban appeal request:


Further information is available here:




What do other staff members here think? 🙏
 
I have received a ban appeal request:


Further information is available here:




What do other staff members here think? 🙏
Banned for vandalism 8 months ago? Doesn't seem to have been here long. But seems apology is reasonable.

I'm okay with a 2nd chance, but another one to keep a watchful eye on and that were should be especially strict with if they repeat similar offenses.
 
Okay. Is it fine if we unblock one of their accounts that they prefer then? 🙏
 
I didn't know it was a staff thread tbh as there were other non staff comments there but ofc @Dark_Soul20189 weirdly loves me so much he stalks my entire activity to only point me out once again.

And I don't understand where you got "manipulation" from considering all I said was that the thread he made was already a rule violation since there's already a discussion ban about it (a fact pretty much everyone seems to agree with in the thread).
 
Last edited:
I didn't know it was a staff thread tbh as there were other non staff comments there but ofc @Dark_Soul20189 weirdly loves me so much he stalks my entire activity to only point me out once again.

And I don't understand where you got "manipulation" from considering all I said was that the thread he made was already a rule violation since there's already a discussion ban about it (a fact pretty much everyone seems to agree with in the thread).

I didn't know it was a staff thread tbh as there were other non staff comments there but ofc @Dark_Soul20189 weirdly loves me so much he stalks my entire activity to only point me out once again.
It was a staff thread since its creation. You would have to go to the staff discussion category, and click on the thread.

“They did it too” is not an argument.
And I don't understand where you got "manipulation" from considering all I said was that the thread he made was already a rule violation since there's already a discussion ban about it (a fact pretty much everyone seems to agree with in the thread).
King_Nanaya was only able to point out two similar arguments used in the threads under the discussion rule.

1 of the examples he pointed out used a completely different argument, and the other was from a thread that doesn’t even have any real discussion, it just got closed from copy and pasting from Reddit.

Again, stop artificially inflating the issue to your benefit. I’ve noticed this pattern with you.
 
It was a staff thread since its creation. You would have to go to the staff discussion category, and click on the thread.
if someone messages a thread to you, it can be hard to tell what section its in.
image.png

It's very easy to miss, and I almost posted my comment without realizing, until someone told me.
 
It was a staff thread since its creation. You would have to go to the staff discussion category, and click on the thread.
Well, I didn't have to go to any staff discussion category. I simply got a notification that someone made a tier 1 Nasu downgrade and I clicked on the notification.
“They did it too” is not an argument.
Yes it's not. I wasn't trying to make an argument. I was pointing out something that occurred.
King_Nanaya was only able to point out two similar arguments used in the threads under the discussion rule.

1 of the examples he pointed out used a completely different argument, and the other was from a thread that doesn’t even have any real discussion, it just got closed from copy and pasting from Reddit.
You literallt used arguments about solar level Nasu. Same argiment that has been discused several times already. What are you talking about?
Again, stop artificially inflating the issue to your benefit. I’ve noticed this pattern with you.
"Artificially inflating?" What does that even mean? Maybe you should following rules and stop stylishly disregarding them because of your downgrade-boner for the verse.
 
if someone messages a thread to you, it can be hard to tell what section its in.
image.png

It's very easy to miss, and I almost posted my comment without realizing, until someone told me.
I genuinenly didnt even know it was a staff thread. Who makes a downgrade thread about Nasu tier 1 and limits it to staff members that most likely don't know much about the verse?
 
I genuinenly didnt even know it was a staff thread. Who makes a downgrade thread about Nasu tier 1 and limits it to staff members that most likely don't know much about the verse?
If not, we all know what was going to happen.

The thread would be at a minimum of 5 pages, and completely unreadable.

Nanaya let me know that he was going to comment on discord, and I essentially said “ok, go ahead”.
 
Reporting @Tdjwo for commenting in a Staff thread without admin permission..
This part is far more likely just a genuine mistake.

It becomes so much worse since the comment included, trying to manipulate people into reporting @Wankbreaker ... It is clear as day He is still going after Wankbreaker, even after what happened, in the last report. And to make things even better, he is still doing the thing he complained about...
This however is becoming a pattern now. While I vehemently disagree there's any form of "manipulation of people to report" Wankbreaker, there's definitely an underlying issue of trying to constantly silence them which has been exhibited in various threads now.
 
This however is becoming a pattern now. While I vehemently disagree there's any form of "manipulation of people to report" Wankbreaker, there's definitely an underlying issue of trying to constantly silence them which has been exhibited in various threads now.
There has to be an explanation on what "silencing" means because if I'm consistently pointing out something that Wankbreaker is doing wrong and it's still being disregarded as me simply silencing them in an inappropriate manner, then aren't I the one getting silenced?

You agree that I did nothing wrong or intentionally malicious, so what makes me still in the wrong here? Calling out a broken rule by Wankbreaker, again?!
 
There has to be an explanation on what "silencing" means because if I'm consistently pointing out something that Wankbreaker is doing wrong and it's still being disregarded as me simply silencing them in an inappropriate manner, then aren't I the one getting silenced?

You agree that I did nothing wrong or intentionally malicious, so what makes me still in the wrong here? Calling out a broken rule by Wankbreaker, again?!
Discussion rules are for repeated arguments. Very few of my arguments ( if any) are repeated. If you think otherwise, please cite what portion of my arguments are repeated, and cite the exact portion where they were addressed. Instead of a vague “this was already addressed, close this now.” As you’ve done to try and silence other people with

You did this to a previous nasuverse topic.
 
Not really a report

But can some staff tell Slime supporters to not make unnecessary comments if there are no arguments to be made from their end and trying to fill the thread with replies which zero contribution? @Dark_Soul20189 made two replies with zero counter arguments related to the threads.

I just want to peaceful end the thread not with this antagonisms and unnecessary things piling up.
 
But it is always advisable to provide the reason why you disagree with something to see if such reasoning is valid and to be open to debate.
^
Yeah I just wants them argue instead of filling the page (we currently have less messages for a single page). Any staff who would want to evaluate would lose interest later onwards. So they might find it annoying if they see more pages even though no one has made any proper arguments and pages are filled with I disagree or I agree.
 
Yeah, nothing report worthy here, members are free to express their disagreement with any topic if they wish. But it is always advisable to provide the reason why you disagree with something to see if such reasoning is valid and to be open to debate.
Fully understand, I wanted to state my disagreement, and leave the debating and explaining parts to the once much better than me at the job. let's be honest. It is much better and more coherent if we leave the explanation and debating part to a single person that can do the job better the job better. I currently have very little time due to IRL stuff and far from the best at explaining/debating things, but if worse comes to worse I will do my best to explain it.

Feel free to delete this message.
 

This guy is kinda just consistently being a jerk and has been openly antagonizing people participating in the tourney for a bit now. I think this is against the site rules.
I'd give that guy a warning for rude behaviour, but it seems like they also have a ban listed on their history. Though, I can't see it in their ban log; it seems like a rather old ban.
 
Back
Top