Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This comment probably won't help at all, so please delete it if I break the "don't comment if it's not useful" rule.Btw, just to add more to this, it seems Kirinator also deleted the message by Agnaa regarding that edit restriction.
I've now left a notification for a 6 month editing restriction.
Changing a profile without a CRT: 7 (First Warning, Second Warning, Third Warning, Fourth Warning, Fifth Warning, Sixth Warning, Seventh Warning)
In terms of editing, the profile was created from a CRT of mine, the mention of injuries and such could've been changed as a weakness or mentioned in that CRT of mine as I forgot it was there as the CRT appeared to be dying, I suppose an edit restriction of a week of sort would be fine.Hmm. Do you have anything to say in your defence, @Kirinator07 ?
I also think that MrKerf's posts should remain here, and feel sorry for our Russian members who want to be able to enjoy the same kind of entertainment and online friendships that they could before their government started to block everything outside of their own borders.
Is it reasonable for us to at least let Vergil's account remain unbanned here? As MrKerf said, the options for regular Russian citizens have been greatly diminished during the last few years, so shared family accounts are likely rather commonplace, and I do not want to help isolate regular Russian citizens from the outside world.
I think that @MrKerf should be allowed to post in this thread regarding this topic.Regarding Cyber_Vergil: I feel sympathetic towards the situation in Russia and the issues that arise as part of it. Complications are to be expected and I hesitate to disregard insight from another person in the same country- they'd have a better point of view on the specifics than I. However, it is still an extremely common "defense", and while I could understand more generous interpretations behind some of their posts, the verbiage to me implies them being the same person rather than related close parties.
I don't know a good solution regarding this that does not ask for evidence well beyond the scope of what we ought to ask for. I'd personally be willing to vote that a very close eye be kept on Vergil for the time being, but given the muddiness of the situation am not particularly faithful that all of this is not fake.
I did delete the ones regarding the breaking of such rules but not necessarily the editing mistake ones from 1 to 5, I would maybe suppose a week of reflection would do if that's what is considered of course.You also deleted and ignored lots of warning messages that I just restored, including one that told you outright that we will have to ban you if you continue deleting them.
To be fair, that's not really the case. We in Russia commonly use VPN all the time, since most of the sites are blocked anyway (you can notice me sometimes complaining about wikidot).
If this is the case, could we just (if necessary) ask FANDOM if his or Vergil's IPs semi-commonly change and have overlapped at some point?DarkGrath also makes very good sense above.
There is a bunch of evidence. Sharing interests, having joined after Darth was banned, having the same formatting for calcs, etc.Also, Agnaa doesn't make sense to me, sorry Ant.
What extra evidence to being innocent? What's up with innocent until proven otherwise? Here even the so-called classic "it was my sibling" doesn't work since different IPs.
Besides the "go seek work" thing, which was admitted, I don't see any actual evidence of sock puppeteering.
Thank you for reading my not-so-in-depth guide to Russia computer management.
I don't think that's likely enough. We have to draw our line of evidence somewhere, and I'm more than happy to draw it here.Is it reasonable for us to at least let Vergil's account remain unbanned here? As MrKerf said, the options for regular Russian citizens have been greatly diminished during the last few years, so shared family accounts are likely rather commonplace, and I do not want to help isolate regular Russian citizens from the outside world.
That CRT wasn't passed, creating a thread and having no-one accept it isn't sufficient for bypassing an editing restriction.In terms of editing, the profile was created from a CRT of mine, the mention of injuries and such could've been changed as a weakness or mentioned in that CRT of mine as I forgot it was there as the CRT appeared to be dying, I suppose an edit restriction of a week of sort would be fine.
I don't know why that's happening to you. I just opened them up in a different browser that's not logged in and they loaded fine.This comment probably won't help at all, so please delete it if I break the "don't comment if it's not useful" rule.
But for me, so much this warning.
Like these two in bold.
They're not showing up for me, like they've been deleted.
I've warned them and blocked them for three days. Other staff members can feel free to make that ban longer.
Apparently Ant restored the messages, but they were previously deleted.I don't know why that's happening to you. I just opened them up in a different browser that's not logged in and they loaded fine.
That CRT wasn't passed, creating a thread and having no-one accept it isn't sufficient for bypassing an editing restriction.
I've applied a one month ban, the allegations of warning deletion turned out to be false, so I'm fine with this result.
Link to the edit he made
You also deleted and ignored lots of warning messages that I just restored, including one that told you outright that we will have to ban you if you continue deleting them.
Just to point out, Ant did confirm he did restore the deleted messages.I've applied a one month ban, the allegations of warning deletion turned out to be false, so I'm fine with this result.
I did delete the ones regarding the breaking of such rules but not necessarily the editing mistake ones from 1 to 5, I would maybe suppose a week of reflection would do if that's what is considered of course.
It's alright, I don't want to derail the staff workplace any longer. Just gave a few insights and I still think that you're not thorough enough with your investigation. Sure, being a family member can be a made-up excuse, doesn't mean it is the case.I think that @MrKerf should be allowed to post in this thread regarding this topic.
I don't see itI don't know if it's against the rules, but this profile @Nostredam is using a naked woman as a cover
Hm, I'm a bit torn, all relevant body parts look to be censored or covered up, so I'm not sure if it would count as a rule violation.I don't know if it's against the rules, but this profile @Nostredam is using a naked woman as a cover
Given our definition of what exactly a Stomp Thread is, I don't believe that is one.Can't help but feel this is an abuse of power but Moritzva self proclaimed a VS match a stomp despite 7 people agreeing otherwise and locked the thread.
Walter White tries to fight a dinosaur again (12-12-0)
Rules: Speed equalized Herrerasaurus has it's Above Average lifting strength Walter White has his Smith & Wesson Model 442 Battle takes place in Gus's Superlab Walter has prior knowledge Heisenberg: (MrKerf, Shmeatywerbenmanjenson, XSOULOFCINDERX, Serlock_Holmes, AThe1412, H3110l12345I20...vsbattles.com
No, Walt has not been in such a stressful situation as shooting a dinosaur. In fact, he has hardly ever used guns in active combat situations against other people. Even the gun that he does have is a smaller gun that wouldn't even be particularly threatening to a dinosaur and its hide. Walt doesn't have prep at all, he has prior knowledge (which is not particularly useful against a dinosaur). He is literally just a cancer-ridden man with a glock staring down a dinosaur that is four times bigger than him and made of kill.Given our definition of what exactly a Stomp Thread is, I don't believe that is one.
A stomp is a match where there is little to no challenge or danger for the winning character. Beyond being decisive, there will be little room for debate, only requiring a cursory knowledge to determine. Examples include massive tier differences, massive hax differences, and passive abilities against characters with no resistances. Examples of non-stomps include both characters having methods of winning, but one character being able to enact theirs more reliably or quickly.
Mori's argument relies on Walt missing shots, and getting scared, despite having preparation.
The arguments towards Walt winning rely on him using his preparation to get into places that are hard for the dinosaur to reach, or being able to land some lethal shots before the dinosaur could properly charge him down.
This seems like a situation that's reasonably open to discussion; given the stressful situations Walter's been in, it's arguable how well-composed he'd be in this sort of situation. And even Mori's argument for Walter losing still gives Walter a non-negligible chance of winning.
As such, I'm re-opening the thread.
If you believe this to be an abuse of power, rather than a mistake, you should report it to HR, instead of here.
Everything else you mention are things worthy of active debate.Yea If Walter knows ahead of time that he could be ambushed he'd just climb to a high railing where he can overlook basically the whole lab
No.My bad on the preparation part, I misunderstood the OP's claim of "prior knowledge", after seeing this comment
Everything else you mention are things worthy of active debate.
Does being threatened by murderers count as being as stressful of a situation as seeing a small dinosaur on the other side of a lab, when you know everything about that dinosaur?
Does deploying explosives, or an automatic machine gun from the trunk of a car count as a reasonable indication of being able to keep cool in high-stress combat situations?
Whether the gun is good enough is also a topic of reasonable discussion, imo; Flashlight made some interesting points comparing the build of the dinosaur to a grizzly bear, and using that to evaluate its effectiveness.
As our page on Stomp Threads clearly explains that stomps need to be beyond reasonable discussion, I'm re-opening the thread. I'd rather not sit here in a lock-war with you while we wait for other staff to evaluate this, so I'll try to expedite that process.
Tier-wise, they both have 10-A Durability with 9-C AP Bullets vs Claws.A stomp is a match where there is little to no challenge or danger for the winning character. Beyond being decisive, there will be little room for debate, only requiring a cursory knowledge to determine. Examples include massive tier differences, massive hax differences, and passive abilities against characters with no resistances. Examples of non-stomps include both characters having methods of winning, but one character being able to enact theirs more reliably or quickly.
Continuing on your message wall since this seems disjointed from the original report at this point.There is literally nothing Walter can even do. It's a cancer ridden middle aged man vs one of the largest terrestrial predators in history. He has no win conditions.
Accounts that only show up to blatantly severely troll and/or vandalise within our wiki should almost always be given instant permanent bans.I've warned them and blocked them for three days. Other staff members can feel free to make that ban longer.
That is correct, yes.Just to point out, Ant did confirm he did restore the deleted messages.