- 12,191
- 6,130
Please stop comparing me to people like that, I don't want to get involved with matters that are none of my business.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 1,314
- 1,058
Someone vandalism anos profile
- 5,576
- 3,606
manually reverted.
Likely a troll since he changed tiers to high 1-B
Likely a troll since he changed tiers to high 1-B
- 31,459
- 34,319
Honestly, the "Finite Universe" thread was the only one where Nostredam had some decent points; he wasn't right about the "Translations being wrong" given they were correct given Executor's comment. But the possibility of being hyperbolic is still a fair point. But everything else combined with the fact that he recycled a lot of the same points that many Dragon Ball opponents come before him, has shown proper structure skills despite supposedly being new to the forum, uses argumentum ad verbosium as a common tactic, and long story short has used arguing out of ignorance to try to counter against the reasons for the established cosmologies. And while some Dragon Ball supporters could have responded more appropriately, it's important to note that Nostredam bombarding the same topics he knows full well are extremely controversial and uses some underhanded tactics to push for it kind of falls under him provoking the others. Plus, he poisoned the well saying that "A bunch of people including higher up staff agreeing with someone who has debated elaborately." He implied that some of us were agreeing blindly without reading points even those a lot of us legitimately has read over the points left and right and read the counter arguments in detail; he fails to realize it is often better to just agree with a side rather than just repeat the same things people already said a thousand times over.
As for Lindsay, at bare minimum she should be warned not to be making such random jokes or derailing a staff only thread where regular users had no permission to comment. But the fact that it was so quickly does sound like a sign of trolling.
I blocked the vandal.
As for Lindsay, at bare minimum she should be warned not to be making such random jokes or derailing a staff only thread where regular users had no permission to comment. But the fact that it was so quickly does sound like a sign of trolling.
I blocked the vandal.
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,165
- 5,328
Maybe she was joking, let her explain and then give a warning or an ban depending on how she answers
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,165
- 5,328
True. Though internet can make people do dumb jokes so
- 9,982
- 10,821
Well, a joke or whatever, no one will tolerate being targeted for no reason outta nowhere, especially when Ant literally said nothing in that thread, a 2 month ban would be least in these cases, but considering he has apologized, maybe 1 month and 2 week ban with a strict warning Should do? He can't explain anything beyond he already has in Ant's wall anyway.
He apparently has left the wiki, so 1 or 2 doesn't seems to matter much but a instructions on his wall regarding improvement in his behavior may will be helpful if he came in future.
- 13,228
- 21,044
For Nostredam, I'm not sure. I'd say about a month but at the same time he clearly doesn't even wanna be here anymore
- 5,084
- 2,917
Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for editing with Anos profile with no accepted CRT.
I've reverted the changes btw
I've reverted the changes btw
- 7,889
- 14,936
No she didn't, it was from this CRT.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,453
I literally linked the accepted CRT in the changelog.
EDIT: 2 seconds late, damn. Anyways, I've reverted Tatsumi's changes.
EDIT: 2 seconds late, damn. Anyways, I've reverted Tatsumi's changes.
- 5,084
- 2,917
Emphasis on "no accepted CRT". What was removed not only wasn't accepted, it has nothing to do with the CRT in the first place
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,453
You can see the latest vote tally in this post, where 3 staff were neutral, 2 agreed, and 1 disagreed with removing resistance to Order. That is a majority, and given the thread had no new staff input for over a month (and Elde was going to apply the other accepted changes anyways), I decided to apply that change since Elde wouldn't.
- 5,084
- 2,917
"Via resisting time stop" which isn't the only thing his resistance is based on. Else pointed it out and you ignored it
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,453
The entire point was that resisting abilities granted by order (which is the source of a god's powers) does not grant resistance to the manipulation of order itself. Resisting time stop was just the example in the thread itself.
Anyways, this is a laughable attempt at a report, so I'll leave this in the hands of staff (if they even feel like dealing with this again).
- 20,083
- 10,871
Yeah this report is unwarranted, Fuji wasn’t vandalizing with no CRT when that thread had enough staff input on certain abilities that it can be applied.
- 5,084
- 2,917
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,453
- 5,084
- 2,917
Huh, I think y'all are misunderstanding something. She was warned before making the edit and I only posted here to announce my reversal of the edit. I'm not ruling for any punishment.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,453
- 20,083
- 10,871
@Tatsumi504 you are reporting her for changing a page with no accepted CRT, that’s basically claiming she’s vandalizing the page, doesn’t matter how you worded it, you’re still accusing her of something she didn’t really do.
- 5,084
- 2,917
No, by the OP of the CRT stating what was discussed had no effect on the profile and she would be reported if she did.
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #19,392
So about this...
- 5,084
- 2,917
How else am I supposed to phrase a report on the report thread? I said I'm reporting, I didn't say anything about punishment.
I didn't know how else to phrase it and with my recent experience with insubstantial reports against me I felt the need to send it hear. I've also caused some troubles for Ant, when I was new, in the past considering he monitors edits so...
- 11,393
- 13,149
Did she get the necessary amount of staff votes or not.
- 5,084
- 2,917
Yes, for something that has no consequence to what is indexed on the profile
- 11,393
- 13,149
Very cool, that means she's got leave to edit it in.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,453
Just mentioning that I've yet again reverted Tatsumi's edits. The staff consensus is that my edits are fine to stay, so cut it out.
- 5,084
- 2,917
Staff consensus was resisting CM and Law based on resisting Time stop is invalid. You have zero consensus on the rest, if so show it
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,453
No, I meant in this thread. Also, I did show it, multiple times.
- 15,467
- 22,549
What’s the profile in question? If an edit war’s going on I’ll just lock it after Fuji’s edits are applied.
Similar threads
- Locked
