What part of this is report worthy? This is just banter and joking that you always disagree with Maou Gukin threads... is this a genuine report?
They were obviously joking. Not seriously talking though.
yeah i think all of them should be banned for atleast 3 months. These sort of personal attacks are unappreciable. Even if these were jokes ,a person should not be bullied for their opinion especially when he is a staff.
Well it doesn't sound like they are insulting or demeaning you, they are just saying what usually happens in those threads from what I've seen.
Seriously. You read that and thought "Why yes, these warrants a 3 month ban, how dare they disrespect staff!
".
It is a matter of fact and not an expression of hate.
The user stated clearly that their message was not intended to convey hate and was meant to be lighthearted and humorous in nature.
In this instance, it is noted that you were the only one who disagreed with the prevailing view. This scenario is considered to be normal and acceptable. It is important to emphasize that there was no intention to personally attack or bully anyone through these differing opinions.
This was not even a warning or hate, this was a joke based on your activities in our verse.
And it was evidently a playful remark that is not intended to cause harm.
I see.
Thank you for taking the time to understand the statement. Your comprehension is much appreciated.
Is this explanation satisfactory to you, @Everything12, or do you still feel like you are being ganged up upon simply for trying to do your job?
Well, as previously stated no one insulted him or threw hate at him, i and they just made a little joke that was not a personal attack or anything to be offended by and the joke itself is something that is practically true in any case so I don't know where the bad feelings would comes from.
I always think I get along well with everyone, I show respect and only play with people who are close to me and have good humor, but what bad luck that the first time I make a tiny joke it results in a drama and a report. As I said, I don't have any problem with E12 and i think we usually get along fine, it's up to him what he thinks of me, I don't really care.
^ I assume, everything12 accepted that those are not report worthy, so the case likely can be closed.
Yes. Agreed.
Neither are you, lol.dread ur not staff please just let them handle it
Errr ur right
ant already covered it.. but i'll drop it idrc either way
why do vs thread necros keep getting reported here when the rules literally state there is no time limit
Because trying to bump threads that have been inactive for like 2-3 years is often pointless and the profiles will have very likely changed in that time ( thus making the match now outdated as stated in the rule ).
not a rule violation
yes, but i still see people getting warned for necroing matches that aren't outdated
you may not like it, but no rules are being broken. there aren't any rule violations to report. i'd like to think we can settle things like this on a personal level here without running off to tattle to the mods. especially when they're just doing something that our current rules explicitly allow them to do.
Not my problem, you shouldn't be uselessly bumping and commenting on threads that were left to die.
yes, then it's a rule violation. i see people getting reported when the matches aren't outdated.
deal with it somewhere else, i don't care. rvr is made for rule violations. unless the match is outdated, they are literally following the rules.
What if instead going on about what is right and what isn't (because at the current moment, there is no limit on a necro, I even made a whole post on necro limits and all staff agreed there was not a limit from my recollection) staff just idk, make a new rule? Maybe something along the lines of any thread "Posting in vs threads which contain outdated material is considered a necro. This rule also applies if a thread is x years old." Staff can come up with a timeframe.
As long as the versus thread remains current, there is no violation of rules. This is precisely why an exception was made for versus threads, as characters can still be updated even if they have been inactive for an extended period of time. Therefore, instead of creating a duplicated thread, you may engage in debate within the existing versus thread.
dread ur not staff please just let them handle it
