Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He always disagree with anything related to maou so
They should put Everything12 as opponents in here since he always disagrees whenever there is a MGK op
no hate tho
Only E12 disagree and that's not unusual at all
not express participation =/= agree or disagree.
Lol man, don't lie next time.
If you're new to mgk thread then I will tell you one thing, that E12's disagreement is 1000% expected so no one ever surprises at all.
And they continued.You should not be doing or saying this
Tbh if E12 agrees with any controversial mgk thread it means that his account got hacked.
What part of this is report worthy? This is just banter and joking that you always disagree with Maou Gukin threads... is this a genuine report?Normally I wouldn’t be complaining about this, I know where these opinions come from and I've been around d long enough not to let it effect me, but this time it went a bit too far.
They were obviously joking. Not seriously talking though.What part of this is report worthy? This is just banter and joking that you always disagree with Maou Gukin threads... is this a genuine report?
The most that's needed is for a staff to go to the thread and tell them to knock it off if it makes you upset. Or better yet, have you tried asking them to stop? This is a pointless report.
yeah i think all of them should be banned for atleast 3 months. These sort of personal attacks are unappreciable. Even if these were jokes ,a person should not be bullied for their opinion especially when he is a staff.Normally I wouldn’t be complaining about this, I know where these opinions come from and I've been around d long enough not to let it effect me, but this time it went a bit too far.
Especially after this was said
And they continued.
Well it doesn't sound like they are insulting or demeaning you, they are just saying what usually happens in those threads from what I've seen.Especially after this was said
And they continued.
Seriously. You read that and thought "Why yes, these warrants a 3 month ban, how dare they disrespect staff! ".yeah i think all of them should be banned for atleast 3 months. These sort of personal attacks are unappreciable. Even if these were jokes ,a person should not be bullied for their opinion especially when he is a staff.
It is a matter of fact and not an expression of hate.He always disagree with anything related to maou so
The user stated clearly that their message was not intended to convey hate and was meant to be lighthearted and humorous in nature.They should put Everything12 as opponents in here since he always disagrees whenever there is a MGK op
no hate tho
In this instance, it is noted that you were the only one who disagreed with the prevailing view. This scenario is considered to be normal and acceptable. It is important to emphasize that there was no intention to personally attack or bully anyone through these differing opinions.Only E12 disagree and that's not unusual at all
This was not even a warning or hate, this was a joke based on your activities in our verse.If you're new to mgk thread then I will tell you one thing, that E12's disagreement is 1000% expected so no one ever surprises at all.
And it was evidently a playful remark that is not intended to cause harm.Tbh if E12 agrees with any controversial mgk thread it means that his account got hacked.
I see.It should be noted that the verse community has become accustomed to your routine of dissenting opinions in the threads, to the extent that your perspective carries minimal value, as it is often not accompanied by substantive arguments, but instead, a generic disagreement.
In this vein, I can attest that I have also experienced frustration with your disagreements in the past, particularly in the context of my MG cosmology thread. Despite respectfully requesting the reasons behind your disagreement, I was disappointed by the lack of productive discourse and ultimately, chose to ignore your contribution. Subsequently, you agreed with Ultima's conclusion, which was in alignment with the premise of my thread.
Thank you for taking the time to understand the statement. Your comprehension is much appreciated.I see.
Is this explanation satisfactory to you, @Everything12, or do you still feel like you are being ganged up upon simply for trying to do your job?And well Everything, leaving aside the game and jokes I did not make any comment to make fun of you or in any way to throw hate in any way, I just joked with something that is usual and you know very well that I never make jokes about you or anyone, first time I do it, Besides I have been knowing you for a few years and debating with you in any way and I don't hate you or anything even though you are always or most of the time against my verse which I don't even care because I am not a wanker or a heated guy who gets angry when someone disagrees with me. That's all
Well, as previously stated no one insulted him or threw hate at him, i and they just made a little joke that was not a personal attack or anything to be offended by and the joke itself is something that is practically true in any case so I don't know where the bad feelings would comes from.Okay. No problem. I just don't want him to go away with bad feelings about this situation
I always think I get along well with everyone, I show respect and only play with people who are close to me and have good humor, but what bad luck that the first time I make a tiny joke it results in a drama and a report. As I said, I don't have any problem with E12 and i think we usually get along fine, it's up to him what he thinks of me, I don't really care.It is better if you both get along afterwards.
^ I assume, everything12 accepted that those are not report worthy, so the case likely can be closed.I see.
Yes. Agreed.^ I assume, everything12 accepted that those are not report worthy, so the case likely can be closed.
Neither are you, lol.dread ur not staff please just let them handle it
Errr ur rightNeither are you, lol.
And iirc us "normal" users can comment on threads like this, if we have something of value to say about the situation.
why do vs thread necros keep getting reported here when the rules literally state there is no time limitPlease do not bump topics that have been inactive for over 3 months without a legitimate argument, and entirely avoid bumping topics that have been concluded. However, we make exceptions for versus threads. There is no exact time limit as long as the characters in question are not outdated.
Because trying to bump threads that have been inactive for like 2-3 years is often pointless and the profiles will have very likely changed in that time ( thus making the match now outdated as stated in the rule ).why do vs thread necros keep getting reported here when the rules literally state there is no time limit
i'm even not talking about outdated threads, i've seen users getting warned here for simply necroing. i understand that it's very mildly annoying for some people but there is no rule against it, why is it brought here
People don't like being pinged for things they no longer have any interest in.
Unfollowing every single thread you've every posted in routinely the moment you lose interest in them is a far bigger ask than just not necroing old posts.
not a rule violationBecause trying to bump threads that have been inactive for like 2-3 years is often pointless
yes, but i still see people getting warned for necroing matches that aren't outdatedand the profiles will have very likely changed in that time ( thus making the match now outdated as stated in the rule ).
you may not like it, but no rules are being broken. there aren't any rule violations to report. i'd like to think we can settle things like this on a personal level here without running off to tattle to the mods. especially when they're just doing something that our current rules explicitly allow them to do.Plus it's annoying.
long as the characters in question are not outdated.
Not my problem, you shouldn't be uselessly bumping and commenting on threads that were left to die.not a rule violation
yes, but i still see people getting warned for necroing matches that aren't outdated
you may not like it, but no rules are being broken. there aren't any rule violations to report. i'd like to think we can settle things like this on a personal level here without running off to tattle to the mods. especially when they're just doing something that our current rules explicitly allow them to do.
yes, then it's a rule violation. i see people getting reported when the matches aren't outdated.Threads necroed after 3 years usually are outdated though
deal with it somewhere else, i don't care. rvr is made for rule violations. unless the match is outdated, they are literally following the rules.Not my problem, you shouldn't be uselessly bumping and commenting on threads that were left to die.
If nobody has replied in years it's pretty safe to say they either don't care about the match anymore or want to recreate it.
Quite simple..
What if instead going on about what is right and what isn't (because at the current moment, there is no limit on a necro, I even made a whole post on necro limits and all staff agreed there was not a limit from my recollection) staff just idk, make a new rule? Maybe something along the lines of any thread "Posting in vs threads which contain outdated material is considered a necro. This rule also applies if a thread is x years old." Staff can come up with a timeframe.I do think that we have rules against bumping very old threads actually. These are more lenient when it comes to versus threads, but our members should still use their common sense to not bump outdated threads for characters with currently mismatched statistics, as that will just bother the other members that are subscribed to them.
As long as the versus thread remains current, there is no violation of rules. This is precisely why an exception was made for versus threads, as characters can still be updated even if they have been inactive for an extended period of time. Therefore, instead of creating a duplicated thread, you may engage in debate within the existing versus thread.Please do not bump topics that have been inactive for over 3 months without a legitimate argument, and entirely avoid bumping topics that have been concluded. However, we make exceptions for versus threads. There is no exact time limit as long as the characters in question are not outdated.General Rules | Discussion Rules
dread ur not staff please just let them handle it