Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, it has to be 7 votes each to be added. Adding matches with only 3 votes is just rushing the thread.Someone's threatening to report whoever fixes this mistake.
Taehoon Seong
Seong Taehoon is the son of 'Taekwondo legend', Hansoo Seong. Since young, he was considered a prodigy in the sport, having even made an appearance in a KBS show, where he beat a high schooler while still in primary school. He was nicknamed 'spin genius' because of his talent for executing...vsbattles.fandom.com
Cloudyagami is trying to include a battle that has only 3 votes and was closed down for unknown reasons. I'm reporting now before I get reported.
Edit - Is there a case where we allow a match to be added even if it's only 3 votes?
I remember reverting his edits on the Mikey page as well, he's still doing it?Someone's threatening to report whoever fixes this mistake.
Taehoon Seong
Seong Taehoon is the son of 'Taekwondo legend', Hansoo Seong. Since young, he was considered a prodigy in the sport, having even made an appearance in a KBS show, where he beat a high schooler while still in primary school. He was nicknamed 'spin genius' because of his talent for executing...vsbattles.fandom.com
Cloudyagami is trying to include a battle that has only 3 votes and was closed down for unknown reasons. I'm reporting now before I get reported.
Edit - Is there a case where we allow a match to be added even if it's only 3 votes?
He has repeatedly defended himself saying it was agreed upon.No, it has to be 7 votes each to be added. Adding matches with only 3 votes is just rushing the thread.
Nonstop.I remember reverting his edits on the Mikey page as well, he's still doing it?
Someone's threatening to report whoever fixes this mistake.
Taehoon Seong
Seong Taehoon is the son of 'Taekwondo legend', Hansoo Seong. Since young, he was considered a prodigy in the sport, having even made an appearance in a KBS show, where he beat a high schooler while still in primary school. He was nicknamed 'spin genius' because of his talent for executing...vsbattles.fandom.com
Cloudyagami is trying to include a battle that has only 3 votes and was closed down for unknown reasons. I'm reporting now before I get reported.
Edit - Is there a case where we allow a match to be added even if it's only 3 votes?
@cloudyagamiI remember reverting his edits on the Mikey page as well, he's still doing it?
There is not.Edit - Is there a case where we allow a match to be added even if it's only 3 votes?
Someone's threatening to report whoever fixes this mistake.
Taehoon Seong
Seong Taehoon is the son of 'Taekwondo legend', Hansoo Seong. Since young, he was considered a prodigy in the sport, having even made an appearance in a KBS show, where he beat a high schooler while still in primary school. He was nicknamed 'spin genius' because of his talent for executing...vsbattles.fandom.com
Cloudyagami is trying to include a battle that has only 3 votes and was closed down for unknown reasons. I'm reporting now before I get reported.
Edit - Is there a case where we allow a match to be added even if it's only 3 votes?
So, him reporting you isn't valid.
- Regarding verdicts:
- The winner will be determined by the side having better constructive arguments, rather than one word/one sentence votes, which will be disregarded.
- However, one word/one sentence votes agreeing with another member's reasoning will be accepted as valid votes.
- For a verdict, there must be at least seven votes in favor of one character/team, with a minimum difference of three votes. Some examples:
- A final vote tally of 6-0 will be considered invalid.
- A final vote tally of 7-0 will be considered valid.
- A final vote tally of 7-4 will be considered valid.
- A final vote tally of 7-5 will be considered invalid.
- If both sides have equivalent posts with constructive arguments, the thread shall be deemed inconclusive.
- Inconclusive matches, in which the opposing parties are incapable of defeating each other, should only added to profiles if they had a notable debate. A debate is considered notable, in this context, if it features a lengthy debate over an aspect not directly listed on profile. Examples of such are standard tactics (if not listed), ability mechanics and (unlisted) potency, interaction between abilities, weaknesses, verse equalization, potential methods to circumvent resistances and immortalities, potential learning or growth they could achieve in the timeframe of the fight, whether they could escape long enough for prep based abilities to come into play, etc.
- When the thread reaches a valid vote count, a grace period of 24 will be acknowledged, starting when the final vote that resulted in valid vote count was posted. After this time period the match can be added, with proper format, to the respective characters' pages, or, for Tier 2 characters or otherwise locked profiles, requested in the Versus Addition Request Thread.
yeah I had to report him for adding stuff back to mikeys page that was removed and he always messes up lookism pagesI remember reverting his edits on the Mikey page as well, he's still doing it?
Thank you for helping out.There is not.
He has been warned on his profile wall.
There is not.
He has been warned on his profile wall.
Thank you guys for the swift response
Yeah ik a lot of calc group members have issues with him tooAye, I had considered making a comment about that. It seems like Yagami consistently ignores warnings and just... goes and does more rule violations as wantonly as he pleases. I agree with Pain_to12, we ought to discuss something more.
A short term ban (perhaps two weeks to begin with, as most of his offenses have been quite minor) would be the best way to step it up to make it clear that our warnings aren't just for show, I feel.
I had little idea he was a repeat offender. What are some other examples of bad behavior?@cloudyagami has been reported three times in the span of a month, for offenses he actually committed all of them having to do with editing profiles. I think this time he deserves more than a slap on the wrist. An actual warning
I can attest to this that some of his calcs have been... subpar on quality, requiring me to engage in lengthy discussions to get anything usable out of them at times, if even possible.Yeah ik a lot of calc group members have issues with him too
yeah i've gotten about 3-4 of his removed and he always argues about it an never removes themI can attest to this that some of his calcs have been... subpar on quality, requiring me to engage in lengthy discussions to get anything usable out of them at times, if even possible.
Though then again, this seems to be a case for a bunch of other calcs I have seen on TokRev so what do I know.
It's not just yagami who I am making the focus of my problems to be frank, but rather this massive influx of poorly-made TokRev calcs popping up everywhere.First, let him speak before doing anything. What if he has any comments?
Guy has a history of tinkering with pages without CRTs, and has been warned about it multiple times, dating back to October and continuing well into November. His page edits have earned him multiple warnings. While I feel it is a minor thing, he's also been reported for needless bickering/firebrand behavior. They're all fairly trivial offenses but at this point, across the past two months, the man has racked up a good amount of warnings and reports. Clearly warnings aren't an effective means of communicating the issues with this behavior.I had little idea he was a repeat offender. What are some other examples of bad behavior?
I found this post rather mocking of me and my ability to think independently. I grew enraged to a level I in all likelihood shouldn’t have, and thus responded more harshly than I should have, saying:I love how Adam basically said, "Midori might trick Gon and three-shot him!!!" and Pikaman is already jumping to the voting.
Full post hereKindly **** off with the pettiness… your post reeks of hypocrisy… Your statement was childish, and disrespectful, if not slimy.
Hoping to draw a line under the incident. I then proceeded to spend the rest of my post debating points made in the thread.I’m hoping that was an isolated incident, and we can now return to a civil debate. At the very least, I’ll attempt to do such.
Full post here…you can already put yourself in your place and keep quiet… you can't debate for shit… you can't debate for shit ²…
Full post hereThat wasn’t a shot at you (exclusively at least), it was an acknowledgment that up until your comment the debate had been civil and of high quality. I myself admittedly got more riled up than I should have (though I still do take offence to what you said), and I had cooled down somewhat by the time I got to that part of my message, so I was just saying I wanted the debate to not be tainted by what was a poor piece of form from the both of us. I apologise I responded in such a harsh manner
As well asDon't care
Full post herejust quit debating already.
Seconded, and I apologise again for doing soYeah. You jumped the gun with the response
"Kindly **** off with the pettiness" over me questioning his vote - "hypocrisy" or not....Yeah. You jumped the gun with the response but going through the thread, that was fairly rude of him. If it had been left at the first couple of responses, I wouldn't say that a warning is even needed- a couple of mean words are expected to be strewn into the mix when people are passionate about something, no harm no foul, comes with the hobby. But the man clearly isn't even interested in the debate or the discussion, the language he's using reads to me like he just wants to shut shit down, not have a talk or hear another side. Toxic behavior all around.
Let's wait to hear from the man.
Technically you were the one who provoked him with the way you've worded your statement which made it seem like you were gaslighting him over a vote. Although Pika did kinda jump the gun in here."Kindly **** off with the pettiness" over me questioning his vote - "hypocrisy" or not.
I felt like he was harsh, I replied with harshness. There's nothing else to it. The continuous passive-agressiveness is present in both sides of the report, so I feel like this is pointless and blown out of proportion.
I agree in regards to the initial back-and-forth, but I tried to stabilise the situation and you continued - which is why I made the reportI felt like he was harsh, I replied with harshness. There's nothing else to it.
Me when I misuse the term gaslighting.Technically you were the one who provoked him with the way you've worded your statement which made it seem like you were gaslighting him over a vote. Although Pika did kinda jump the gun in here.
almost the entire report was over my first reply. And then you complained because I said I did not care about the sections of the post unrelated to the match. I did not want to respond to it, and that makes me toxic? How about saying my questioning of your vote is "childish, disrespectful and even slimy"? I recommend you talk to real people more often, you seem to think even a minor interaction can be blown to something report worthy - and worse, people are actually agreeing.I agree in regards to the initial back-and-forth, but I tried to stabilise the situation and you continued - which is why I made the report
Love the Non-sequitur by the way, Mr. Staff. Took the conclusion out of that thinker brain, huh?But the man clearly isn't even interested in the debate or the discussion, the language he's using reads to me like he just wants to shut shit down, not have a talk or hear another side. Toxic behavior all around.
And the prodigy sideliner join the roaster to join the sea of over sensitiveness. Hilarious. I quite literally said I wouldn't reply to this joke of a report any longer - also you're not supposed to reply to reports you're not involved in, so you can take that advice to yourself, how about that?@TioKill can you please shut up?
Your passive aggressive attitude is not making things any better. You're making everything worse.
You saying I'm not responding anymore isn't the point.And the prodigy sideliner join the roaster to join the sea of over sensitiveness. Hilarious. I quite literally said I wouldn't reply to this joke of a report any longer - also you're not supposed to reply to reports you're not involved in, so you can take that advice to yourself, how about that?
Now the above regarding Tio is resolved for now although I do feel like if it happens more than twice, there should been a temporary ban.Guy has a history of tinkering with pages without CRTs, and has been warned about it multiple times, dating back to October and continuing well into November. His page edits have earned him multiple warnings. While I feel it is a minor thing, he's also been reported for needless bickering/firebrand behavior. They're all fairly trivial offenses but at this point, across the past two months, the man has racked up a good amount of warnings and reports. Clearly warnings aren't an effective means of communicating the issues with this behavior.
I'm not really savvy on the Calc Group problems people have, as bad calcs aren't really an exceptionally uncommon thing, and certainly not a reportable offense (unless we get to the point of outright malicious ignorance/hiding of facts, that is). But the man has received enough warnings, I feel, to warrant some form of higher action.
Aye, I had considered making a comment about that. It seems like Yagami consistently ignores warnings and just... goes and does more rule violations as wantonly as he pleases. I agree with Pain_to12, we ought to discuss something more.
A short term ban (perhaps two weeks to begin with, as most of his offenses have been quite minor) would be the best way to step it up to make it clear that our warnings aren't just for show, I feel.
A two weeks forum and wiki ban is probably warranted then. It is important to post wiki and forum message wall information to him regarding why this happened in conjunction though.Guy has a history of tinkering with pages without CRTs, and has been warned about it multiple times, dating back to October and continuing well into November. His page edits have earned him multiple warnings. While I feel it is a minor thing, he's also been reported for needless bickering/firebrand behavior. They're all fairly trivial offenses but at this point, across the past two months, the man has racked up a good amount of warnings and reports. Clearly warnings aren't an effective means of communicating the issues with this behavior.
I'm not really savvy on the Calc Group problems people have, as bad calcs aren't really an exceptionally uncommon thing, and certainly not a reportable offense (unless we get to the point of outright malicious ignorance/hiding of facts, that is). But the man has received enough warnings, I feel, to warrant some form of higher action.