- 167,676
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #3,721
There have been no sockpuppet warnings so far.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 167,676
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #3,723
This is correct, yes.
- 21,468
- 30,790
Love the character, but rules are rules.
Buggy the Clown's profile has been vandalized, adding a new key of self explainable wank on the profile.
I've reverted the edits though.
Buggy the Clown's profile has been vandalized, adding a new key of self explainable wank on the profile.
I've reverted the edits though.
- 10,064
- 5,290
This does look like it might be a premeditated troll going after the profile, particularly due to the grammar of said edits and the amount of edits this user has made so far. Regardless, I will simply lash out a serious warning, telling him the next time something like this happens he will be banned. I don't know if this is the appropriate response, and whether he should be banned straight-up, but this will be the action I shall perform nonetheless.
- 10,064
- 5,290
Very well. Perhaps I was attempting too much of a soft-handed approach to the situation regardless, so that is fine.
- 4,942
- 1,316
Yeah, that guy is a text book troll, he literally made the page look like a god modes page on JBW or GMW
- 10,064
- 5,290
To be fair, I noticed he made two edits prior to the Buggy thing, both of which was adding image justifications to certain statistics to both Yogiri and Denji. (Though, the links to the Denji images come from a manga sharing website, which needs to be changed)
This was the only reason why I was considering doing a major warning instead of a full-on ban.
This was the only reason why I was considering doing a major warning instead of a full-on ban.
- 16,000
- 9,238
Bigsmoke4269 made a troll thread.
Considering his previous behavior and bans, I suggest a permanent ban.
Considering his previous behavior and bans, I suggest a permanent ban.
- 4,298
- 2,800
Oh, just give him a last-chance warning. This was harmless.
- 4,298
- 2,800
Sight cannot be reached.
- 1,580
- 486
Whoops link didn’t work. I did report the comment
- 1,580
- 486
- 4,298
- 2,800
It is rude, but it's only worth a stern warning.
Ian2296
He/Him- 426
- 172
AKM sama already warned him(AncientKing I mean.)
- 15,337
- 22,145
Perhaps a very short block? Bigsmoke does seem unwilling to shape up, though his offenses aren’t too terribly bad.
- 1,404
- 542
1 week block should be enough
- 11,624
- 15,996
Another stern warning or a week/month ban should be more than enough imo. As annoying as it could be, I don't think being obnoxious is a perma-ban worthy offense tbh.
- 4,942
- 1,316
Yeah, probably deserves it
- 15,337
- 22,145
2 weeks is reasonable
- 4,451
- 1,949
Yeah, don't ban his IP address. Don't want anyone else to get banned accidentally.
- 11,624
- 15,996
Yeah......
XSOULOFCINDERX
They/Them- 21,302
- 8,984
Most definitely.
- 4,298
- 2,800
I'm still a huge fan of a stern, last-chance warning. Smoke did something that was harmless, and though it was obnoxious, this does not mean he deserves a TWO WEEK BAN. Can we please not overreact here? We know he has ban banned for 3 months I believe, but that situation was far worse.
- 15,436
- 7,857
I think you're overestimating just how bad a two week ban is. I'm on this site almost every day and even I wouldn't see two weeks as that big a deal.
- 12,085
- 2,096
2 weeks is not that severe of a ban.
- 4,298
- 2,800
It's an overreaction to be sure.
- 4,451
- 1,949
It may be an overreaction if we treated this as a one time event, sure. But it's a consistent action that he's been punished for previously and hasn't shaped up at all. That's the whole point of something like a tally system, their punishments get worse because they keep doing the wrong thing.
Similar threads
