• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Planck69 said:
So, I have a mild feeling of suspicion that the user Otonashi is a sock puppet OkkotsuEdgy. They seem to have been made on the same day around a week ago and Oto only has two posts, which were Otonashi agreeing with OkkotsuEdgy on this thread and both agreeing with this other thread today.

Maybe I'm just being paranoid but they give off a sockpuppet vibe to me.
Click to expand...
There have been no sockpuppet warnings so far.
 
Just_a_Random_Butler said:
Lock the pages from who? All users? To every pages? I don't think that's a good idea. Only administrators can edit then. But if it's about locking pages from users that aren't autoconfirmed, then the VSB practices dictate that we already do that.

We only lock pages from being edited by all user, if those pages are prone to vandalism, or are popular characters and pages, or characters around tier 1. Because locking and unlocking for any kind of changes, small or big, to any kind of pages, is an absolute inefficiency.
Click to expand...
This is correct, yes.
 
This does look like it might be a premeditated troll going after the profile, particularly due to the grammar of said edits and the amount of edits this user has made so far. Regardless, I will simply lash out a serious warning, telling him the next time something like this happens he will be banned. I don't know if this is the appropriate response, and whether he should be banned straight-up, but this will be the action I shall perform nonetheless.
 
To be fair, I noticed he made two edits prior to the Buggy thing, both of which was adding image justifications to certain statistics to both Yogiri and Denji. (Though, the links to the Denji images come from a manga sharing website, which needs to be changed)

This was the only reason why I was considering doing a major warning instead of a full-on ban.
 
I suppose that is another idea. He seems incapable of shaping up his generally obnoxious behaviour though, which wastes the time of everybody else.
 
Is some other staff member willing to provide warnings to both members please?
 
Okay. That is good.

What about Bigsmoke?
 
Perhaps a very short block? Bigsmoke does seem unwilling to shape up, though his offenses aren’t too terribly bad.
 
Maybe a very strict warning would be enough?
 
The issue is that he is just obnoxious, and that's it. He doesn't spam, derail, threaten, insult, or harrass, for example.
 
Another stern warning or a week/month ban should be more than enough imo. As annoying as it could be, I don't think being obnoxious is a perma-ban worthy offense tbh.
 
Okay. How about two weeks? Just be careful to not ban his IP addresses as well.
 
I'm still a huge fan of a stern, last-chance warning. Smoke did something that was harmless, and though it was obnoxious, this does not mean he deserves a TWO WEEK BAN. Can we please not overreact here? We know he has ban banned for 3 months I believe, but that situation was far worse.
 
I think you're overestimating just how bad a two week ban is. I'm on this site almost every day and even I wouldn't see two weeks as that big a deal.
 
InfiniteDay said:
I'm still a huge fan of a stern, last-chance warning. Smoke did something that was harmless, and though it was obnoxious, this does not mean he deserves a TWO WEEK BAN. Can we please not overreact here? We know he has ban banned for 3 months I believe, but that situation was far worse.
Click to expand...
2 weeks is not that severe of a ban.
 
Two weeks is nothing
If this person has willfully continued their negative actions they deserve a month
 
It may be an overreaction if we treated this as a one time event, sure. But it's a consistent action that he's been punished for previously and hasn't shaped up at all. That's the whole point of something like a tally system, their punishments get worse because they keep doing the wrong thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
37 38 39
Replies
2K
Views
113K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
  • Featured
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
6K
Agnaa
Agnaa
  • Locked
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
21
Views
2K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
714
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top