Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While I do agree I was toxic, I think both Wankbreaker and Zeona were both as toxic. Using words like mf which we know the full meaning of, and other little insults also constitutes for a warning. These guys are newcomers and they've already caused enough problem in the Nasuverse thread. They are the sole reasons the thread is in utter chaos because before they even made an account there, it was completely peaceful for a while.I've posted on the thread but I will state it here:
I have given a formal warning to @Tdjwo for his behavior. Continued behavior of the like can be discussed for topic, thread, or full bans. I've also told Wank and Zeona to not engage in that sort of behavior, even to rebuff the opposer; I agree Zeona's behavior is a bit toxic in its own right, and I do not intend to babysit the situation. Further infractions to this end on their behalf should be met with a warning as well.
This seems reasonable, but I have not investigated the issue. What do you think, Bambu?While I do agree I was toxic, I think both Wankbreaker and Zeona were both as toxic. Using words like mf which we know the full meaning of, and other little insults also constitutes for a warning. These guys are newcomers and they've already caused enough problem in the Nasuverse thread. They are the sole reasons the thread is in utter chaos because before they even made an account there, it was completely peaceful for a while.
I think if I get a warning, they all should get a warning too. Don't see why I'm the only one given warning when they were just as toxic.
can’t speak of Zeona’s behavior, but all I’ve been doing is criticizing the arguments. not insulting the person behind them,really.This seems reasonable, but I have not investigated the issue. What do you think, Bambu?
Chiming in, I don't think the other two user's behavior are warning worthy. Tdjwo was unambiguously the provoking party and went in much more on the insults. The worst Zeona said was "clown" in response to being called a clown. If Tdjwo had done nothing wrong and I'd been in the thread at the time I probably would've told Zeona to tone it down, but I don't want to take a "well all parties involved are in trouble" when users defend themselves against bullying. Tdjwo has a history of this, as well, and does it regularly.This seems reasonable, but I have not investigated the issue. What do you think, Bambu?
I'll avoid repeating what happened in the other thread. After all, this site is meant to be a discussion forum. The goal is to try and get a word in,even if that means not always agreeing with each other's opinions, in whatever argument, without resorting to insults or toxicity.Chiming in, I don't think the other two user's behavior are warning worthy. Tdjwo was unambiguously the provoking party and went in much more on the insults. The worst Zeona said was "clown" in response to being called a clown. If Tdjwo had done nothing wrong and I'd been in the thread at the time I probably would've told Zeona to tone it down, but I don't want to take a "well all parties involved are in trouble" when users defend themselves against bullying. Tdjwo has a history of this, as well, and does it regularly.
Chiming in, I don't think the other two user's behavior are warning worthy. Tdjwo was unambiguously the provoking party and went in much more on the insults. The worst Zeona said was "clown" in response to being called a clown. If Tdjwo had done nothing wrong and I'd been in the thread at the time I probably would've told Zeona to tone it down, but I don't want to take a "well all parties involved are in trouble" when users defend themselves against bullying. Tdjwo has a history of this, as well, and does it regularly.
Okay. Never mind then. Thank you for your evaluations.Just woke up.
I more or less agree with Deagon's assessment. I think Tdjwo provoked them and generally behaved worse. There is something to be said for Zeona fighting toxicity with toxicity, but I don't think it reached a point where a warning was necessary (had it continued, it very well may have).
DaReaperMan said:Yeah, Bigsmoke. His profiles have been fine for awhile, I just didn't want to poke the bear incase he got complacent. Yes, I am threadbanned from RVR(for good reason I might add)
You can't tag staff. As for the report, the person seems to be a bit mean but nothing really that bad, I don't think it's even warning worthy.My personal Cosmology ( 5D cosmology ).
I’m writing a cosmology that contains infinite amount of universes ( it is a 5D space containing an infinite amount of 4DSTC ). An infinite amount are the same as ours, another infinite amount of them has minuscule to massive differences to our own etc. But, I was told that the “physics” must...vsbattles.com
@Antvasima
I want to report comment #13.
I disagree. His behavior is targeted, unwarranted and demeaning.You can't tag staff. As for the report, the person seems to be a bit mean but nothing really that bad, I don't think it's even warning worthy.
Yes, I agree, I'd be fine with a message being sent to the user asking them to be a bit kinder.I disagree. His behavior is targeted, unwarranted and demeaning.
I am not trying to overlook these comments.I cannot imagine these types of comments are just overlooked if he were to respond this way to a staff member.
Other staff tend to visit this thread and reply to reports, don't worry.i still want to get in touch with somebody who can help me report this comment if I’m not allowed to tag staff.
I’ll ask him to tone it down.Yes, I agree, I'd be fine with a message being sent to the user asking them to be a bit kinder.
I am not trying to overlook these comments.
Other staff tend to visit this thread and reply to reports, don't worry.
i appreciate your help and would appreciate if you could help redirect my report to the proper staff, as soon as possible.Yes, I agree, I'd be fine with a message being sent to the user asking them to be a bit kinder.
I am not trying to overlook these comments.
Other staff tend to visit this thread and reply to reports, don't worry.
Sure.I’ll ask him to tone it down.
I assure you it wont, other staff will evaluate it when they have time.i appreciate your help and would appreciate if you could help redirect my report to the proper staff, as soon as possible.
I don’t want my report to get buried under other’s.
I’ve also made a proper response to the reported user as I assume I was allowed to?
The hilarious thing is that not only do we, the staff, tank these comments because we see them minute irritants at best, we are likely the target of several times as many. Who better to shake your fist at than the law of the land, even if said law is just a collection of otherwise normal users akin to yourself, yes?I disagree. His behavior is targeted, unwarranted and demeaning.
I cannot imagine these types of comments are just overlooked if he were to respond this way to a staff member.
i still want to get in touch with somebody who can help me report this comment if I’m not allowed to tag staff.
i understand I must endure harsh comments here and there. It’s effortless to report each one. I’ve experienced previous insults in my posts and I’ve ignored them.The hilarious thing is that not only do we, the staff, tank these comments because we see them minute irritants at best, we are likely the target of several times as many. Who better to shake your fist at than the law of the land, even if said law is just a collection of otherwise normal users akin to yourself, yes?
Vzearr is right that this is not worthy of formal retort. Even a warning is not warranted, especially as (most) of the comment is indeed intended to be constructive criticism. If you were not seeking criticism, one would not post questions about such things.
Some elements of the post should be nicer, as if these paltry offenses stack up indefinitely they certainly can and do result in action being taken. But one off unkind comments aren't considered serious enough to warrant action, least we ban every user on the forum for not walking on eggshells all day long.
I'll also post in the thread, however, telling him to remember our first rule: be polite.
Context is this threadSomeone get TotalMasterInfinity before I actually get mad.
He acted hostile for no reason for a DxD thread and refused to “listen to what we have to say” in the OP just cause we disagree. I won’t lie, but even I said something afterwords cause that actually got me heated that someone to start nothing but trouble for no reason. I will edit later cause I’m on the phone currently
"BlackeJan, Digital_Franz and Phoenks if you don't agree with something just say "I don't agree", I'm not interested in hearing anything else."
"I think I said that I'm not interested in hearing anything from you other than whether you agree or disagree with 1 or both of the points mentioned. The fact that you are unable to understand something so simple is not my problem. I will ignore any further comments from you, have fun talking to nothing."
I mean, it's annoying but not necessarily a rule violation, I feel like this at most warrants a message being sent to the user to calm down, even that seems quite hasty.Reporting @TyphonEX for spam and harassment of staff. To summarize, he has been spamming staff of the re-opening of his rejected thread of GoW, even questioning why it was closed despite it's rejection. I think the volume speaks for itself,
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/comments/121279/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/88675/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/88676/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90875/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90874/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90873/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90872/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90871/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91933/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91934/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91935/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91938/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91940/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/92298/
Yeah, it probably should be noted that he seems inexperienced, given his lack of activity on the wiki.I mean, it's annoying but not necessarily a rule violation, I feel like this at most warrants a message being sent to the user to calm down, even that seems quite hasty.
I'll also add that he is a self admitted sock of a permabanned user who was originally given a 1 year long ban back in January 2021 for doing the exact same thing he is doing right now between 2019-2020. And later had that ban extended to permanent when he made obvious socks and continued to harass people in message walls. And has since made more socks over the years.Reporting @TyphonEX for spam and harassment of staff. To summarize, he has been spamming staff of the re-opening of his rejected thread of GoW, even questioning why it was closed despite it's rejection. I think the volume speaks for itself,
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/comments/121279/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/88675/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/88676/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90875/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90874/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90873/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90872/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/90871/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91933/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91934/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91935/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91938/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/91940/
- https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/92298/
OK, that's significantly worse then. I suppose we're to ban this account?I'll also add that he is a self admitted sock of a permabanned user who was originally given a 1 year long ban back in January 2021 for doing the exact same thing he is doing right now between 2019-2020. And later had that ban extended to permanent when he made obvious socks and continued to harass people in message walls.
Yeah, figured it was a deleted profile post, so couldn't see who they were referring to.Just a clarification that Medeus is referring to this former member.
Where does it show he's a self-admitted sock in the link you sent?I'll also add that he is a self admitted sock of a permabanned user who was originally given a 1 year long ban back in January 2021 for doing the exact same thing he is doing right now between 2019-2020. And later had that ban extended to permanent when he made obvious socks and continued to harass people in message walls. And has since made more socks over the years.