• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dereck03 said:
I'm fine with what Griffin's said as it was their first time doing that and seems to be unintentional.
Click to expand...
Okay. I will unblock @Doomrider7 then.

Thank you for your input.

Also, Doomrider7, please be much more careful in the future when you post links in our wiki or forum (or otherwise).
 
Antvasima said:
Okay. I would appreciate input from other staff members as well then. 🙏
Click to expand...
Their apology seems genuine enough, and if there is the possibility of a false positive (mentioned by Dereck) then I think it would be fine to roll back the punishment and just remember this for the future.

Antvasima said:
Can somebody help me evaluate this case as well please? I think that I may have applied a far too harsh block time.

vsbattles.com

Jujutsu Kaisen Honored Ones Upgrade

Thats one
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Click to expand...
Have you contacted him at all? It seems like at least some of his edits were indeed not allowed but usually we'd only go for an immediate ban if they were obviously troll-like in nature. If you hadn't contacted him and this was his first offense, I'd agree that we should tone it down to a stiff warning and proceed from there.

StrymULTRA said:
I'd like to report Deleted member 16409 as they're getting very aggressive recently towards me:
Plus it's not even the first time they get so aggressive over Undertale stuff in discussions with me (here or here), and kinda of derailed an UT thread too back then.

Edit: There's also this, screenshotted before they deleted it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, this guy was objectively the aggressor in practically all of these scenarios (and more that were in that thread but unlinked). A stern warning could do for now, but if it is ignored/disobeyed, I think a ban would be in order, since usually this sort of thing is mitigated by everyone instigating the conflict- not so, here.

Deleted member 16409: You really, really need to tone back the aggression and insults. We expect a level of maturity on this forum from our users, at least enough to engage civilly in discussions. If you can't, then you leave us little choice in the matter and you will be banned. So, please, behave.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mr._Bambu said:
Deleted member 16409: You really, really need to tone back the aggression and insults. We expect a level of maturity on this forum from our users, at least enough to engage civilly in discussions. If you can't, then you leave us little choice in the matter and you will be banned. So, please, behave.
Click to expand...
alr
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mr._Bambu said:
Their apology seems genuine enough, and if there is the possibility of a false positive (mentioned by Dereck) then I think it would be fine to roll back the punishment and just remember this for the future.
Click to expand...
Yes. They have also thanked us afterwards for giving them a chance via an email message.
Mr._Bambu said:
Have you contacted him at all? It seems like at least some of his edits were indeed not allowed but usually we'd only go for an immediate ban if they were obviously troll-like in nature. If you hadn't contacted him and this was his first offense, I'd agree that we should tone it down to a stiff warning and proceed from there.
Click to expand...
I did try to contact them, yes, and they did not respond until afterwards.

vsbattles.fandom.com

MonkeDogy

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

I have unblocked them and given them a warning message instead now.
Mr._Bambu said:
Yeah, this guy was objectively the aggressor in practically all of these scenarios (and more that were in that thread but unlinked). A stern warning could do for now, but if it is ignored/disobeyed, I think a ban would be in order, since usually this sort of thing is mitigated by everyone instigating the conflict- not so, here.

Deleted member 16409: You really, really need to tone back the aggression and insults. We expect a level of maturity on this forum from our users, at least enough to engage civilly in discussions. If you can't, then you leave us little choice in the matter and you will be banned. So, please, behave.
Click to expand...
Agreed. Thank you for helping out. 🙏❤️
 
Last edited:
Dragonstitch said:
So i found that Blazeking17 has vandalized Sulphur (Phantom_Brave)'s page. Not only does Sulpur only shows up in a non canon plotline in the postgame was applied with no CRT.
Click to expand...
I reverted the changes:

vsbattles.fandom.com

Sulphur (Phantom Brave)

Sulphur is a dark god from the X-Dimension that came to Ivoire to destroy it but was stopped by a group of 9 heroes who were trapped between the 2 Dimension. Now sending his shadows to attack Ivoire until he returned to Ivoire where he was fended off by the characters of Phantom brave, and...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

@Blazeking17

What do you have to say for yourself?
 
GoldenScorpions said:
This user has created this profile that pretty much breaks all rules. Judging by his message wall, he was given warnings last month.
Click to expand...
Sir Ovens deleted the page; and based on his history. It seems a temporary block is in order. Though Fandom seems to be having a lot of loading issues on my end. So I cannot check let alone apply the block. And for how long? 3 months sound good?
 
I have been talking with him, and he doesn't seem to mean any harm. It is just very hard to get through to him and make him understand.
 
I don't want to be too harsh, but could any of you look at what's going on here?
vsbattles.com

Ben 10: Re-justification of Low 1-C.

New standard: This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). For example, a higher spacetime continuum with two...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
 
LuffyRuffy46307 said:
I don't want to be too harsh, but could any of you look at what's going on here?
vsbattles.com

Ben 10: Re-justification of Low 1-C.

New standard: This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). For example, a higher spacetime continuum with two...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
Click to expand...
It's fine now, @LordGriffin1000 handled it.
 
You should preferably link the profile that's been vandalized rather than the verse when making reports, especially when there are multiple pages for the character in question. Nevertheless, I figured out which you were talking about, I'll drop a warning to the user in question, thank you for the diligence.
 
Mr._Bambu said:
You should preferably link the profile that's been vandalized rather than the verse when making reports, especially when there are multiple pages for the character in question. Nevertheless, I figured out which you were talking about, I'll drop a warning to the user in question, thank you for the diligence.
Click to expand...
My mistake, I thought I did link the profile instead.
 
Reporting @Random-Helper323 for his attitude in this vs thread.

Not only is he clearly hostile, he's inspiring hate against the opposing members with baseless accusations then later cries wolf about about it. The lies he's spewing has grown to the extent of accusing the opposing faction of telling him to go **** himself and saying he should go and die.

A quick read through the thread of just over 150 messages reveals no such comments along with the accusations against a group of people who aren't even there considering I'm the only opposing supporter who was there from the beginning till now.
 
Last edited:
That's poor behavior, and I've seen Random acting hostile in the past as well so this seems like an expected escalation. He should receive a warning for this IMO.

Edit: He edited out what he said after seeing the report. I don't think that really helps matters.
 
The "go and die" thing is a cultural metaphorical comment used in Chinese culture in lieu of the Western swear words and equivalent, and used far more often than it should be, in all honesty. However, it's obviously taken literally outside of Chinese culture. With that in mind, I have edited it, since it is clearly not taken the same way outside of Chinese culture where it's used much more generally. I did not edit it to hide it. All the same, I agree I've been too reactive here, as I'm having a bad time in real life at this exact moment. Still, it wasn't reasonable, I apologize to Tatsumi, and I will stop.
 
Last edited:
Deagonx said:
That's poor behavior, and I've seen Random acting hostile in the past as well so this seems like an expected escalation. He should receive a warning for this IMO.

Edit: He edited out what he said after seeing the report. I don't think that really helps matters.
Click to expand...
I second this statement.
 
I agree with the warning, even though the user has specified that it may be a metaphorical comment not everyone is familiar with it and it may instigate problems, the apology seems genuine but it does not detract from the fact that the warning should be given because it appears to have previous similar behavior.
 
Dereck03 said:
I agree with the warning, even though the user has specified that it may be a metaphorical comment not everyone is familiar with it and it may instigate problems, the apology seems genuine but it does not detract from the fact that the warning should be given because it appears to have previous similar behavior.
Click to expand...
I agree that I need to calm down, and I'm working on it. I do apologise to Tatsumi for the misplaced hostility and to the staff for wasting their time.

Update: I will drop the issue this came from, and this serves to tell me that I need to make some major adjustments IRL, so I will work to become calmer like I was before all the real-life stress came in. Apologies once again to all concerned. I was wrong to direct my stresses at anyone here.
 
Last edited:
vsbattles.fandom.com

Suguru Geto

Suguru Geto (夏げ油とう 傑すぐる, Getō Suguru?) is an antagonist in both the Jujutsu Kaisen series and its prequel Jujutsu Kaisen 0: Jujutsu High. He was originally a student of Masamichi Yaga's alongside Satoru Gojo and Shoko Ieiri at Tokyo Jujutsu High. His experiences as a Jujutsu Sorcerer bred a deep...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

I'm unsure if it was an approved CRT since there are corresponding profiles that are Low 7-C but I'm reporting just in case since there was nothing linked.
 
GarrixianXD said:
vsbattles.fandom.com

Suguru Geto

Suguru Geto (夏げ油とう 傑すぐる, Getō Suguru?) is an antagonist in both the Jujutsu Kaisen series and its prequel Jujutsu Kaisen 0: Jujutsu High. He was originally a student of Masamichi Yaga's alongside Satoru Gojo and Shoko Ieiri at Tokyo Jujutsu High. His experiences as a Jujutsu Sorcerer bred a deep...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

I'm unsure if it was an approved CRT since there are corresponding profiles that are Low 7-C but I'm reporting just in case since there was nothing linked.
Click to expand...
Leave JJK profiles as it is for now. I'm gonna change the ratings in future revisions. Currently 4 threads are already active and We are struck in the middle of discussion regarding current calculations. So it will take some time.

Currently we don't have Low 7C ratings for anyone except God tiers. Those 7-A & Low 7-C ratings for fodder characters should be removed and replaced with new Calculations. But as I said currently too many threads are active so can't really do much about that.
 
vsbattles.fandom.com

Demigra (Dragon Ball Heroes)

Demigra (ドミグラ, Domigura?), usually referred to as Demon God Demigra (魔ま神しんドミグラ, Mashin Domugura?), a recurring antagonist in Dragon Ball Heroes. A Demon God imprisoned by Chronoa for attempting to usurp her position as Supreme Kai of Time, he is hellbent taking the position of Supreme Kai of...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

Obvious vandalism.

They also have other vandalising edits on their contributions page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
31 32 33
Replies
1K
Views
95K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
19
Views
2K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
479
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top