- 167,855
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #21,921
Being in the middle is not remotely sufficient. Your changes need to clearly have been accepted by our staff members with evaluation rights.Thats fair, I thought the mods were in the middle
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Being in the middle is not remotely sufficient. Your changes need to clearly have been accepted by our staff members with evaluation rights.Thats fair, I thought the mods were in the middle
Done
I don't believe MorrisHatesYou is a sock, given what he's presented. However, this level of bombardment is completely and utterly ridiculous and a moratorium really needs to be put on thatThere appear to be a few of them bombarding my message wall and that of our wiki representative, King Kai, at least.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/M...eadId=4400000000003575916#4400000000013331344
However, do not bother our wiki representative further please. I have contacted him via Discord.
Well, I just asked ant to keep an eye on the thread I made, simply that, I don't know what the other guy was waffling about.I don't believe MorrisHatesYou is a sock, given what he's presented. However, this level of bombardment is completely and utterly ridiculous and a moratorium really needs to be put on that
you forgot to change the durability, striking strength, and range statistics so I handled it; however, the range, unlike the former two, isn't as dependent on a corresponding AP rating. I known nothing about the verse, but you should probably ask the staff in that thread if they'd be fine with leaving the range; may actually be valid.Done
The range is valid since he did affect 2 universes the thing they disagree with that he shouldnt have AP since he only “united them” so I think thats fineyou forgot to change the durability, striking strength, and range statistics so I handled it; however, the range, unlike the former two, isn't as dependent on a corresponding AP rating. I known nothing about the verse, but you should probably ask the staff in that thread if they'd be fine with leaving the range; may actually be valid.
None of this seems like an issue. ElvisFreshley left one message on your wall and two replies. Morris left two replies. Testzzz left 9 replies, and a message on King Kai's message wall. But none of that seems to have happened to such an extent that it requires us telling them to stop leaving them.There appear to be a few of them bombarding my message wall and that of our wiki representative, King Kai, at least.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/M...eadId=4400000000003575916#4400000000013331344
However, do not bother our wiki representative further please. I have contacted him via Discord.
Except in Testzzz's case, it's not being presented politely at all, it's actually presented very maliciouslyI don't believe we should be in the business of policing opinions such as those, which are presented politely and aren't the product of bigotry.
May just be a difference in perspective thenI don't see anything like that in Testzzz's replies there, or on King Kai's message wall. I think Testzzz is approaching this to our standards of politeness.
So which of the following edits need to be reverted?
what of this?Remove 2-C AP thats it
Maybe the members who have proven to be completely unreliable and unreasonable regarding calculations can be given restrictions in their rights to have their calculations evaluated for at least a few months, and the members who keep relentlessly and unreasonably arguing in calculation blogs to waste calc group members' time should receive warnings that they are not allowed to interrupt calculation blog evaluations anymore, or be banned, and calc group members can receive support from our other staff members in these regards?I don't believe MorrisHatesYou is a sock, given what he's presented. However, this level of bombardment is completely and utterly ridiculous and a moratorium really needs to be put on that
That seems out of left field. The stuff you and Clover have brought up has essentially nothing to do with those people getting their calculations evaluated, or talking about calculations in replies.Maybe the members who have proven to be completely unreliable and unreasonable regarding calculations can be given restrictions in their rights to have their calculations evaluated for at least a few months, and the members who keep relentlessly and unreasonably arguing in calculation blogs to waste calc group members' time should receive warnings that they are not allowed to interrupt calculation blog evaluations anymore, or be banned, and calc group members can receive support from our other staff members in these regards?
All of that should be removed then.what of this?
- removal of the "possibly" for the Planet level rating was rejected by: DontTalkDT and Qawsedf234 as well as indirectly rejected by DarkDragonMedeus and LephyrTheRevanchist.
-100x multiplier for a lot of different stats was rejected by JustaRandomBulter and DonttalkDT
these abilities were rejected by DonttalkDT:
-Surface Scaling
-Text Manipulation
-Elasticity
-Water walking
-Explosion Manipulation
-Age Manipulation
-Either Perception Manipulation or Illusion Creation
-Paralysis inducement
-Shockwave creation
-Resistance to Fear Manipulation
-Sleep Manipulation
-Deconstruction
It is more a case of that not sufficient consensus was achieved to add it in the first place.Also, the moon bursting feat was rejected by DontalkDT and accepted by Qawsedf and indirectly accepted by DarkDragonMedues and LephyrTheRevanchist. Mentioning this cus this may not be enough of a margin to out-vote a Bureaucrat? idk
I do not think that Morris should be punished, but there has legitimately been an absolutely relentless spam of unreasonability and unwillingness to cooperate in many Tokyo Revengers calculation blogs.@ShionAH @catzlaflame Do not engage in extensive debates over things which aren't substantively related to why someone is being reported.
If there's parts of an applied CRT that may need to be reverted, and people disagree about what exactly those are, discuss that literally anywhere else.
In the interest of preservation, I've copied the posts verbatim to catzlaflame's wall.
And since the issue seems to be able to come to an amicable conclusion, by deciding which things should be reverted and which shouldn't through actual discussion, I'll consider this largely resolved.
"Omega, blah, blah, blah"
"Now I'll answer Omega's half-assed points, lol"
"Nullflower comedian "
Holy shit we got more stuff going on. Omegabronic told Luffy to grow up RIGHTLY SO, and this is Luffy's reply:
"You grow up, I don't have to put up with other people making fun of me, if you think it's bad, report me, this is not a place for jokes."
No one was making fun of him.
Yes, please do.
And this time, return with evidence of Immortality on a conceptual-based level, and not an energy-based level.
While the response was a little rude, I don't think it's bad enough for a report. And sounds more similar to a venting "Of course you disagree" type of frustration. And if Omega and/or Null were making fun of him, then he shouldn't be blamed alone and the others should be blamed just as much if not more so. And he brought up points from other threads.This man LuffyRuffy is being a jerk to omegabronic and nullflower for absolutely no reason, all they did was disagree with his points, with luffyruffy not even bothering to read their argument.
"Omega, blah, blah, blah"
"Now I'll answer Omega's half-assed points, lol"
"Nullflower comedian "
Holy shit we got more stuff going on. Omegabronic told Luffy to grow up RIGHTLY SO, and this is Luffy's reply:
"You grow up, I don't have to put up with other people making fun of me, if you think it's bad, report me, this is not a place for jokes."
No one was making fun of him.
I also do not think that it is bad enough for a report, but everybody involved should still try hard to continuously behave well towards each other.
Thank you very much, I will improve more every day and avoid mistakes.While the response was a little rude, I don't think it's bad enough for a report. And sounds more similar to a venting "Of course you disagree" type of frustration. And if Omega and/or Null were making fun of him, then he shouldn't be blamed alone and the others should be blamed just as much if not more so. And he brought up points from other threads.
Also, going to make this an announcement since Antvasima informed me of something important. But a lot of staff members and regular users have only reverted parts of the vandalism as opposed as opposed to all of them, It's a good idea to use the rollback button from here for those who have it. Otherwise, it could also be done from this section or by marking the version that was latest before vandalism started and then using undo.This user edited SCP-049's page which I'm assuming was without a CRT given the various editing mistakes and the lack of any CRT link.
I manually reverted the changes already
Regarding this, as someone that has been around these three whether on CRT or on the discussion thread, I can say the rudeness comes from every side and extends to other threads. It is simply a matter of different perspectives when evaluating DB threads, which rolls over into frustration. There had been cases before where Luffy and Omega almost derail entire threads with their bickering on off topic stuff (Null doesn't have anything specific against Luffy, but does make fun and is very sarcastic to multiple supporters in general).This man LuffyRuffy is being a jerk to omegabronic and nullflower for absolutely no reason, all they did was disagree with his points, with luffyruffy not even bothering to read their argument.
"Omega, blah, blah, blah"
"Now I'll answer Omega's half-assed points, lol"
"Nullflower comedian "
Holy shit we got more stuff going on. Omegabronic told Luffy to grow up RIGHTLY SO, and this is Luffy's reply:
"You grow up, I don't have to put up with other people making fun of me, if you think it's bad, report me, this is not a place for jokes."
No one was making fun of him.
Sure but I will just state this one thing before someone just jumps to conclusions.I have not evaluated the above situation yet, but I want to discourage any further back and forth from the two involved parties as both have made their positions clear and I do not want this to spiral out into RVR bickering. Let the staff look into the thread and see what happened, at which point we will decide what is appropriate here.
The links he sent are only showing where I liked comments which were directed at @edutyn and @Georredannea15 not just ShionEverytime he liked someones comment just to provoke me. These are nearly the only comments he liked (All of them being in Anos's side)
1- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5969916
(Doesnt like anyone for nearly an entire page while we are discussing normally)
2- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970500
(Instantly likes a comment that is disagreeing with me)
3- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970509
4- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970518
5- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970541
6- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970570
7- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970576
8- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970648
9- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970700
10- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970734
11- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970737
12- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5970760
13- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971403
14- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971524
15- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971568
16- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971575
17- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971582
18- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971823
19- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971846
20- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971872
21- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971877
22- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971886
23- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971888
24- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5971911
25- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5973200
26- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5973233
27- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5973430
28- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5973522
29- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5973763
30- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5973821
31- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5973917
32- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5974092
33- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5974170
34- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5974201
35- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5974336
36- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5974366
Having read the threadReporting @ShionAH dude just started attacking me for no reason for liking few comments in the threads. Even though I did not specifically liked any comments which are directed at him.
- @EldemadeDityjon What you are doing is really childish and rude. I dont know what I did to you but stop doing that.
- Acting like a child…tf? I sent the nerd emoji as a joke to Setto since I know him, not because I actually tried to insult him. Holy **** do I have to spon feed you sarcasm know?? Instead of liking every single person in existence that disagrees with me move on with your life.
- https://vsbattles.com/threads/battle-of-two-gods-kusuo-saiki-vs-anos-voldigoad.157288/post-5974335
- You are an idiot. I disagree with you = I become someone that disagrees with you = You act like an asshole towards me = My comment is true. Use your brain. I also see you liked the comment above you proving me right.
Just to clarify i didn't liked comments which were directed at him alone. I liked comments which debunked plot manipulation in that thread. I didn't specifically liked comments regarding one person. Just sayingHaving read the thread
While Eldemade made a provoking comment here, it should be noted Shion started the provocation here
So agreed with DDM that Shion made the worse offense, being the instigator and the one to subsequently explode after the fact.
Edit: To be clear, both of these are pretty minor, but it does serve as context to why (I infer) Shion took offense with Elde's liking of comments "against him", resulting in his outburst. I absolutely do not agree said outburst is justified, specially for something so meaningless. Nevertheless, I would support at the very least a warning for Shion
The links he sent are only showing where I liked comments which were directed at @edutyn and @Georredannea15 not just Shion
You both participated in slight banter after some debate. That much is undeniable. However, your outburst would be the one to cross the line. At worst, my advise for Elde is to avoid said banter with people he doesn't know and/or don't have such friendship with. But that's the extend of what I personally would consider to say at him.I am fine with being considered wrong as long as we also see Eldemades intentions.
Notice how I haven't said anything for the liking, moreso explaining what I believe was Shion's thought process (or at least trying to understand it).Just to clarify i didn't liked comments which were directed at him alone. I liked comments which debunked plot manipulation in that thread. I didn't specifically liked comments regarding one person. Just saying