- 21,468
- 30,790
Give em a strict warning
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not offended by his comments and I understand his anger. Many people in the thread were mocking him and calling his arguments bad. After a while the people in the thread just kept arguing to see who was the most wrongReporting @BlackDarkness679 for their behavior in this thread.
Throughout the thread, they've been constantly trying to devalue others by claiming that they know nothing about the series, insulting their intelligence with comments such as "you can't comprehend anything" and "You still decide to be dense dont you?", and is being generally rude to others, even though the other side hasn't done anything really rude besides a mocking meme from SirAlex09, although I wouldn't say that isn't too rude.
Apparently they have a history of being reported for bad conduct, but I'm not really in a position to take action, so I'm just gonna report this and leave it at that
His counterarguments weren't being called bad before he made those comments, and SirAlex09 only called them bad until after everything he said.. And even if you personally weren't offended by it, I wouldn't say that it makes the offense less of an issue considering he was being consistently rude to pretty much everyone in that thread.Many people in the thread were mocking him and calling his arguments bad.
They didn't; in fact, he wasn't even being mocked at all before he made those remarks. The opposite side wasn't being rude whatsoever, but Darkness was being needlessly rude to them.If his comments came after he got mocked, this is reasonable reaction in my opinion.
Ehm no. You guys can check the CRT. He was provoking everyone else and everything else was just an echo towards his attitude. He gets extremely emotional if someone disagrees with him to the point of lashing out in the most rude way.If his comments came after he got mocked, this is reasonable reaction in my opinion.
His arguments were basically this :calling his arguments bad.
I would advise you to look at the CRT and the general tone switch after Blackdarkness came inNevermind then
The user told the OP that he has no knowledge or idea about the verse – does not seem offense or anything
n the same post, he told the user if he is dense or not.
XDDDDDDDDDD Alright. I will remember that this is apprently the tone that is accepted on this wiki.it does not seem if he was offensively intending.
If you looked at the context, he never offended anyone heavily to the point he insulted or violated any rules. It was basically an ad hominem fallacy. He was still within the limits of being a normal person. Not siding both sides, he was being counterintuitive heated in QnA thread where the OP often elucidated he wants to clear up the concept. So both parties are at their fault in my persuasion.XDDDDDDDDDD Alright. I will remember that this is apprently the tone that is accepted on this wiki.
Here is the evaluation I made, and you can surely investigate yourself if you want to.I would appreciate if any of our administrators are willing to help out with evaluating this issue.
We never once tried to excuse our behavior. We simply said King's named shouldn't be brought up when he did absolutely nothing.Both sides were mainly in their fault. DDM was fair with the decision, I hate the fact that the opposing party is trying to excuse their own actions and want to give warning to others. Not only this, but SirAlex was constantly giving unnecessary/provoking comments to the other party, to the point I requested thread moderator to close it.
Just drop the topic already. It's either both parties get their warning or none.
Which were all direct responses to his provocations. I like how you left that part out. You blamed me for keep responding to his provocations while constantly downplaying his actions and then you wonder, why the opposing party calls you out on that.SirAlex was constantly giving unnecessary/provoking comments to the other party,
You were deliberately making just as many inflammatory comments as he was. Stop trying to act like the victim.You blamed me for keep responding to his provocations while constantly downplaying his actions and then you wonder, why the opposing party calls you out on that.
Like you call me out on me calling his arguments bad and telling him to come up with better arguments. At the same time you downplay his tone when he calls people dense or question their cognitive skills. This is like one example of many of being hypocrits.
Oh, I assume @Antvasima made mistake on this then, or he unintentionally added him. In my whole evaluation, I did not mention at all.We never once tried to excuse our behavior. We simply said King's named shouldn't be brought up when he did absolutely nothing.
I am not and I wasn't. You guys are saying factually wrong things, constantly downplaying his statements while constantly inflating ours. I would put my sign on "both sides are at fault" but everything afterwards is utter bs.You were deliberately making just as many inflammatory comments as he was. Stop trying to act like the victim
Medeus mentioned them.Oh, I assume @Antvasima made mistake on this then, or he unintentionally added him. In my whole evaluation, I did not mention at all.
I'm not downplaying Darkness' comments. I was just pointing out the fact that you were trying to justify your action by ******** on Darkness, despite you being just as guilty as him.I am not and I wasn't. You guys are saying factually wrong things, constantly downplaying his statements while constantly inflating ours. I would put my sign on "both sides are at fault" but everything afterwards is utter bs.
He's not justifying his actions. He's just saying Darkness was being very aggressive and that's why he said what he said even if he wasn't right in doing so.I'm not downplaying Darkness' comments. I was just pointing out the fact that you were trying to justify your action by ******** on Darkness, despite you being just as guilty as him.
I request pinging @BlackDarkness679, so he can apologize, and we move on in this topic.Anyway, it is good that several members here seem to take responsibility by apologising for their behaviour,
No one is downplaying others, I even said Darkness was unreasonable being passively heated with his words, but the other party responded fairly. You were only warranting your actions and give it to Darkness, despite the fact that you are no less than him.
Do you guys want to keep going or can we drop it ?I'm not downplaying Darkness' comments. I was just pointing out the fact that you were trying to justify your action by ******** on Darkness, despite you being just as guilty as him.
I appreciate your patience and understanding of this matter.Do you guys want to keep going or can we drop it ?
I apologise for being provocative and disruptive. After going through the entire CRT I don't think all of his points were bad. I even agree with certain ones now.
Do you guys want to keep going or can we drop it ?
I apologise for being provocative and disruptive. After going through the entire CRT I don't think all of his points were bad. I even agree with certain ones now.
Ghostrider penance stare incomingNo. You can't escape from your sins.
I do understand that but you gotta see how just randomly mentioning his name in something that really had nothing to do with him was fishy. (Also I'm sure some of those were jokes but that's between you and King.)I did check an analyzed, and I know on that thread specifically both sides were at fault. BlackDarkness was quite rude indeed, but they're not the only one to blame because most of their worst posts happened after SirAlex repeatedly kept using mockery memes and saying "Cry about it" But I do agree with Dread at this point it's both were warned. And that we should drop that topic now.
Also, the actual reason King's name being mentioned was was for his actions on other threads. He named dropped KLOL for pretty much no reason, which could come off as gossip harassment; speaking of which I know @KLOL506 also has a lot of issues with King in question. He also on multiple occasions deliberately attempted to troll me such appearing on my wall just to deliberately downplay Fire Emblem with 0 context and deliberately ignored the existence of blatant feats which the only motive I could see is to deliberately spite people. And he did do pretty much the same thing by Derailing a Mario thread that was giving simple upgrades to some Mario fodder but then wanted to say "Galaxy level Chain Chomps, pole with galaxy level durability, and assume all Mario verse dirt has galaxy level durability. Despite him saying the infamous "Mario should be Wall level" which is literally Lord Xcano levels of downplay/trolling. And he also did the same thing derailing a Metroid thread just to deliberately ignore feats and downplay the verse.
I also do not remember which previous RVR page it was, but a while back, King was banned before for quite literally self admitting that he deliberately has tried to wank/downplay verses just to spite/provoke people. And based how me and KLOL and most likely many others, it looks like he still does do that.
To be fair, King is renowned for a little bit of trolling but on the verses I personally handle, I've been able to rein him in however much possible so he hasn't gone overboard there, but I will admit he has a habit of taking it a wee bit too far when you least expect it.I did check an analyzed, and I know on that thread specifically both sides were at fault. BlackDarkness was quite rude indeed, but they're not the only one to blame because most of their worst posts happened after SirAlex repeatedly kept using mockery memes and saying "Cry about it" But I do agree with Dread at this point it's both were warned. And that we should drop that topic now.
Also, the actual reason King's name being mentioned was was for his actions on other threads. He named dropped KLOL for pretty much no reason, which could come off as gossip harassment; speaking of which I know @KLOL506 also has a lot of issues with King in question. He also on multiple occasions deliberately attempted to troll me such appearing on my wall just to deliberately downplay Fire Emblem with 0 context and deliberately ignored the existence of blatant feats which the only motive I could see is to deliberately spite people. And he did do pretty much the same thing by Derailing a Mario thread that was giving simple upgrades to some Mario fodder but then wanted to say "Galaxy level Chain Chomps, pole with galaxy level durability, and assume all Mario verse dirt has galaxy level durability. Despite him saying the infamous "Mario should be Wall level" which is literally Lord Xcano levels of downplay/trolling. And he also did the same thing derailing a Metroid thread just to deliberately ignore feats and downplay the verse.
I also do not remember which previous RVR page it was, but a while back, King was banned before for quite literally self admitting that he deliberately has tried to wank/downplay verses just to spite/provoke people. And based how me and KLOL and most likely many others, it looks like he still does do that.
No.He named dropped KLOL for pretty much no reason, which could come off as gossip harassment;
If it's a joke then I clearly missed the punchline because I had nothing to do with GetBackers being in such a terrible state, let alone even know it was still kept around.No.
I have no idea how one could interpret King saying we should blame KLOL because of a verse he doesn't even read, much less scale is currently in a shitty situation profile wise as "gossip harassment". That's clearly just a light-hearted joke. I would remove this from your post since it slightly delegitimizes your otherwise valid observation about King's behavior.