GoldExPoints
He/Him- 694
- 270
This user vandalized this profile, already reverted the changes.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 11,317
- 19,823
He has already been banned for vandalism... And since there's not admins online and to avoid further vandalism from him, I have permanently banned him.
- 31,459
- 34,320
I'd say it's a good call to permaban him. I was busy with RL stuff.
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #15,884
I also think that Ziller does not seem like a bad member or to hold genuinely ableist sentiments. He just unthinkingly used a random insult, that is all. Anything more than 1 month seems very exaggerated. We have to look at the intent and context behind comments as well.
Last edited:
- 31,459
- 34,320
This user was caught with an IP address match with LIFE, who had only recently been banned for 2 months based on staff majority votes. But making socks to get around a ban warrants a ban extension and a permanent ban for the alt account. Though the question is what should the extension of his original accounts ban be extended too?
Edit: I will need to go to RL work, so I won't be able to respond further for the next 9 and a half hours or so.
Edit: I will need to go to RL work, so I won't be able to respond further for the next 9 and a half hours or so.
Last edited:
- 31,399
- 27,689
Up to 4 months, maybe?
- 167,857
- 76,474
- 8,997
- 9,718
- 5,454
- 1,847
This user vandalized this profile. I reverted the edit and i believe the profile needs to be locked.
- 31,399
- 27,689
I've re-locked it.
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #15,891
Is one of our administrators willing to give him a warning please? He doesn't seem malicious, just stressed out.
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #15,892
Thank you for helping out.
- 31,459
- 34,320
Looking at a post from the report queue, but I feel as if @UltimateDarkGod666 needs a report here. It started with this post which sounded randomly out of place and and seems to have offended LGBTQ+ users or as least users who support them. They later said this, which sounds like a good thing though oddly specific and the word "Love" is innocent on it's own though, but it is an easy word to take out of context yes. But @Coomandar called them gross and later called them gross back. But then UltimateDarkGod666 started to do a U-Turn and says some comments that were blatantly Christophobic/Islamophobic using religious blasphemy. And also kept on here and here. This is not excusable under any circumstances.
- 13,228
- 21,044
Ngl this seems very bad in context as well, seems like a fetishization
Elaboration edit: UltimateDarkGod666 could very well just be fetishizing lesbian and bisexual girls, so I'd say Coomander was right to call him gross
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,847
- 15,275
really said " sure I'm bad but lots of other people do this too so I'm actually not that bad!! "
- 31,459
- 34,320
Probably, though simply having fetishes in itself isn't ban worthy though I don't recommend announcing it publicly at random. However, the rest of the post still stands strong.
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,211
Yeah, people need to learn the difference between the actions of churches and the teachings of the religions they follow. The two correlate surprisingly little, and making broad, sweeping generalisations about those religions isn’t ok, nor is the weird behaviour around LGBTQIA+ matters
- 13,228
- 21,044
I would say it is very wrong in a case like this, where it seems he only likes fetishizing LGBTQ+ girls. Also, I really don't think someone would like to have their orientation fetishized
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,847
- 15,275
dude came to my profile lol https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/43588/
- 3,780
- 4,080
Yeah gonna be honest it’s pretty apparent behavior.
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 7,958
- 4,485
Yeah uh, with all of the shit he has posted about gay shiz and religion shiz, I'm surprised we haven't just insta-banned him yet.
- 3,780
- 4,080
To clarify, it seemed very blatant that he was trying to use religion as a scapegoat when I called him out on his apparent bigoted behavior.
- 3,780
- 4,080
Like to pseudo justify his own internalized beliefs onto saying “oh welp religion’s worse so I’m not that bad.” Like projection.
- 18,784
- 13,800
Let's not talk about it anymore, I think everything has already been reported. Just wait for staff to give input
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,847
- 15,275
We don't even openly follow religion so why mention that especially on a OPM thread
- 9,552
- 10,922
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,847
- 15,275
found this linked a bit higher up in the same page of that thread
- 31,459
- 34,320
Obviously, he needs to be banned, but for how long. I think 6 months sounds like a good minimum, possibly even a year.
- 13,228
- 21,044
At least a year
- 31,459
- 34,320
I have banned him for a year.
- 31,399
- 27,689
Reporting @AnimesFreak2 for linking to an NSFW image on a **** site in the Naruto general discussion thread here.
- 18,393
- 14,323
The link you attached is nowhere NSFW.
- 11,552
- 10,976
He essentially did nothing offensive, it was just disgusting and in some ways, pathetic. What he did was basically talk about what he doesn't know and be a fetishist, but is that really worthy of a ban?
- 31,459
- 34,320
That is a link to an xxx website, and the image literally shows someone's entire ass. Furthermore, he said some trollish posts afterward like, "You liked it didn't you?" which could come off as sexual harassment. I believe a short ban is justified unless he apologizes and promises never to do that again.
- 31,399
- 27,689
I'm fine with applying a 1 month ban. Our rules state that linking to pornographic material warrants an instant ban with no warning.
- 31,459
- 34,320
Yes, a 1 month ban seems justified. You may apply it.
TioKill
They/Them- 739
- 465
Sorry to bother, but I've been paying attention to the RVR thread ever since my two reports. This is, like, the third time I've seen you defend toxic and bigoted behavior as "not a big deal". I'd like to recommend you to stop.
Similar threads
- Locked
