• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

DarkDragonMedeus said:
Snip
Click to expand...
And out of all the years I've seen of Weekly and all he's done in regards to VS, I can attest to the complete opposite. But what you say is why it's hard to pin him down, and why it's been this difficult to ban him until now.

I've spoken to the dude, both in chat and on voice. He's fine. A literal normal dude. But, ONLY when it's not focusing on VS.

He's been purposefully misleading, outright lying on revisions. Aggressive, a consistent annoyance, stubborn as a rock. And now this.

He's done and out. I know we get accused of staff bias a lot, and a lot of it is bull. But this is one consistent and reliable example. It is fact that we've been too lenient. Well that, and Weekly's been conducting most of this shit off site so it's hard to track it.

I'd honestly say a 1 year ban is completely warranted. That's my two cents.
 
One year ban, some of the things I've seen him say leading up to this leads me to really believe he and the wiki would be better off without each other, until he can change his attitude for the better. Something I don't think he'd get from continuing to stay here given whats quite literally been said above me here.
 
Crabwhale said:
And out of all the years I've seen of Weekly and all he's done in regards to VS, I can attest to the complete opposite. But what you say is why it's hard to pin him down, and why it's been this difficult to ban him until now.

I've spoken to the dude, both in chat and on voice. He's fine. A literal normal dude. But, ONLY when it's not focusing on VS.

He's been purposefully misleading, outright lying on revisions. Aggressive, a consistent annoyance, stubborn as a rock. And now this.

He's done and out. I know we get accused of staff bias a lot, and a lot of it is bull. But this is one consistent and reliable example. It is fact that we've been too lenient. Well that, and Weekly's been conducting most of this shit off site so it's hard to track it.

I'd honestly say a 1 year ban is completely warranted. That's my two cents.
Click to expand...
I agree.
 
Not really report-worthy, but it is without a doubt unnecessary. Maybe like, the tiniest of warnings is warranted, idk.
 
I think that it was just one of his friends here who was upset about that Weekly did this to himself, given that they asked him for his Discord identity.
 
That may be the case, but I do believe maybe just letting them know not to beat a dead horse would be warranted. There's no real punishment here.
 
People have been doing more lengthy and severe beratings of Weekly in this thread than just calling him a dummy who ****** up.
 
Shit happens, people **** up, other people say stupid shit. Things happen, Ant. And people get aggressive. This isn't a punishment. Weekly is already banned, no point in beating a dead horse and commenting on his profile meaninglessly.
 
Yes, but it isn't warning worthy for a friend of his to express disappointment.
 
It isn't a warning. It's literally a friendly reminder. Just don't do meaningless stuff, it's not strict, it's not even a warning. People should spend their time more meaningfully, and not comment on a banned guy's profile.
 
I am not commenting on the matter again, mostly because I could be doing literally anything else. But just a friendly note: Spend your time wisely. Don't talk to someone who can't hear you or respond. You can be doing other stuff, and that stuff is probably more important than meaningless drivel.

Take my advice to heart, and have a good night everyone.
 
I think the user just needs a warning, but their manner of conversing is just... painful to read, to put it mildly. Like it's impossible to have a constructive conversation/argument with someone who speaks in such a trolling and nearly incomprehensible manner. It's just derailing a general discussions thread somehow.
 
Metalballrun said:
but their manner of conversing is just... painful to read, to put it mildly. Like it's impossible to have a constructive conversation/argument with someone who speaks in such a trolling and nearly incomprehensible manner. It's just derailing a general discussions thread somehow.
Click to expand...
You can criticize a person if they're directly insulting you, but having a certain tone is in no way a bannable, or even a problematic offense. So no, this isn't a valid complaint imo, you can politely ask them to maybe change it, but it kinda ends there :V
 
Shmooply said:
It looks like the guy he was harrassing also started harrassing him as well, so there's that.
Click to expand...
The Timmy person can also be a bit aggressive IMO, but wasn't as bad as the Kashin person. So when they argued with each other the debate easily devolved into what you can observe in that thread. Like fighting fire with fire.
The_Impress said:
You can criticize a person if they're directly insulting you, but having a certain tone is in no way a bannable, or even a problematic offense. So no, this isn't a valid complaint imo, you can politely ask them to maybe change it, but it kinda ends there :V
Click to expand...
Yeah I'm not calling for them to get banned or any kind of punishment. But their manner of speech is associated with how they come across as trolling. I already talked to them about it (mainly to make their posts legible), but the person just laughed at what I said, so there's that.
And like you said, Damage has already warned them about their behavior. So I guess it ends there.
 
Yes. Agreed. I gave him a warning instruction earlier.
 
Yes. It is a problem. I have linked to our welcome instruction message for new members via our front page at least, and regularly post it on message walls of people who edit the wiki for the first time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
30 31 32
Replies
1K
Views
93K
Comiphorous
Comiphorous
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
19
Views
1K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
414
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top