-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 4,298
- 2,800
What is the material in question? This should help us decide what to do with them.
- 4,648
- 963
Something about the Supreme Lord Krishna, and ends linking to a page where you can read Bhagavad-gita.
- 4,648
- 963
Staff thing. I asume regual users can't see it.
Gilad_Hyperstar
He/Him- 11,379
- 4,319
Can you screenshot and link it with imgur or something? That might help
- 4,648
- 963
azontr
He/Him- 40,519
- 50,160
Who the **** writes all that? Ban them.
- 11,904
- 11,514
Some comments here were deleted, I want to know why. Me, @LIFE_OF_KING and other member were just having a casual chatting and making jokes with each other but in portuguese. Is that not allowed? On blogs at least.
- 167,679
- 76,257
- Thread starter
- #6,690
I read the text, and it was inappropriate, but not really offensive. However, since this was his first post here, somebody should probably ban the account.
I placed the text in Google Translate, and it seemed rather crude and very off-topic for a calculation blog that we might link to later. Also, this is an English wiki, so it is confusing for visitors.
- 4,298
- 2,800
I fully agree with this sentiment. A new user whose first post is a thread about religion and indoctrinating people into it. Ban them.
- 167,679
- 76,257
- Thread starter
- #6,694
Just a note that I have nothing against most modern religions. Spirituality is important to counter despair and amoral nihilism, but it is inappropriate to consider talking about them as one's main mission in this forum.
- 11,134
- 14,116
Recently, a complaint about @WeeklyBattles was brought up to the HR group. Here and here, Weekly tried to bribe @Mr._Bambu to prevent him from doing something on his calc.
Weekly says, and I quote: "i will literally pay you to not just say that the picture cant be used and then leave it"
Upon being asked why he's trying to bribe someone, he replied: "people wont listen to reason maybe thell listen to money"
Full conversation can be read here: 1 2 3 4 5
Keeping in mind that it was a serious conversation, there is no sign of him clarifying whether or not he was joking. There's no indication that it was something he didn't mean. Even giving maximum benefit of doubt to Weekly, we can maybe say that it could be taken as a figure of speech of some kind. Like "I'll do anything for you to not do x" instead of assuming he'd actually bribe someone with money. Whatever may be the case, monetary or not, he is basically asking a calc mod to intentionally ignore detail to get his calc accepted, and offering something in return. Still counts as bribing. That is absolutely not something we condone as a site.
Also taking into account Weekly's recent history, the bureaucrats (@Antvasima and @Promestein) and HR group members (@SomebodyData, @Celestial_Pegasus, and @Wokistan) have decided to ban Weekly for one year, with an appeal at the end of the ban (something to evaluate his behavior).
Weekly says, and I quote: "i will literally pay you to not just say that the picture cant be used and then leave it"
Upon being asked why he's trying to bribe someone, he replied: "people wont listen to reason maybe thell listen to money"
Full conversation can be read here: 1 2 3 4 5
Keeping in mind that it was a serious conversation, there is no sign of him clarifying whether or not he was joking. There's no indication that it was something he didn't mean. Even giving maximum benefit of doubt to Weekly, we can maybe say that it could be taken as a figure of speech of some kind. Like "I'll do anything for you to not do x" instead of assuming he'd actually bribe someone with money. Whatever may be the case, monetary or not, he is basically asking a calc mod to intentionally ignore detail to get his calc accepted, and offering something in return. Still counts as bribing. That is absolutely not something we condone as a site.
Also taking into account Weekly's recent history, the bureaucrats (@Antvasima and @Promestein) and HR group members (@SomebodyData, @Celestial_Pegasus, and @Wokistan) have decided to ban Weekly for one year, with an appeal at the end of the ban (something to evaluate his behavior).
- 167,679
- 76,257
- Thread starter
- #6,696
No bashing please. For what it is worth, Weekly is the member with the most wiki edits after myself, and as such has at least made a massive effort to help out over the years.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,053
- 5,983
crazy stuffs and sad
- 61,177
- 14,747
What happened to discord stuff not applying on the wiki?
Plus it was a joke made while asking him to hold off on a response to a feat that was being evaluated
- 9,488
- 10,851
...what?
- 42,613
- 36,890
Jokes like that are completely intolerable. It was a serious conversation and this could very easily be a lie to cover your ass.
azontr
He/Him- 40,519
- 50,160
Nobody is attempting to hurt or defame weekly, but it is the truth Ant. This is in no way acceptable, and it warrants being called out for his shit.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Me and him were talking about a feat that was being evaluated and i asked him to hold off on replying to the blog's comment section, iterally the joke of 'ill pay you to wait until we're dont talking to respond'
- 61,177
- 14,747
It wasnt a serious conversation, ask him
- 11,134
- 14,116
As I was writing the post, I noticed this too.
Weekly also created ruckus over an admin closing an already rejected thread, and went on the apply the changes anyway: https://vsbattles.com/threads/minor-weiss-revision.121271/page-2#post-3987322
Weekly also created ruckus over an admin closing an already rejected thread, and went on the apply the changes anyway: https://vsbattles.com/threads/minor-weiss-revision.121271/page-2#post-3987322
- 61,177
- 14,747
In what manner? Telling a joke in a casual conversation?
- 61,177
- 14,747
ffs the thread was accepted, look at the first page
Hell the revision itself is literally changing two words on a single profile
Seriously what is with you guys tonight?
azontr
He/Him- 40,519
- 50,160
That was in no way casual, Bambu was literally perplexed as to why you would ask something like that, and he literally said he took offense.
Bullshit and you know it, weekly.
- 61,177
- 14,747
It was in fact said as a joke
You were one of the people who agreed to it though?
azontr
He/Him- 40,519
- 50,160
Ok? Does that mean it was accepted? My opinion doesn't mean shit when a bunch of other people could give their opinions. You also had no staff opinion either.
- 11,134
- 14,116
Dude, it's very easy to offer a bribe and when it gets rejected, everyone can act like "haha I was just joking anyway, you know".
- 42,613
- 36,890
Why the **** would that be a god damn joke to someone who is already on ******* edge (Sera incident)and is one of the most serious admins I know.
the majority said no.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Youve known me for how many years, you really think im the type to genuinely try to bribe someone over somthing like this? Seriously?
- 61,177
- 14,747
What do you mean? Is something wrong?
And it was reverted and then later accepted a second time
azontr
He/Him- 40,519
- 50,160
Yes, something is very ******* wrong. The guy was still on edge about the incident, and then you throw shit like that around.
No, your proposal wasn't accepted. It was actually completely altered by other people.
- 61,177
- 14,747
And i was supposed to know this how? I barely talk to the guy
- 11,134
- 14,116
None of that justifies that you went ahead and made a change to a profile when the change wasn't accepted properly.
- 42,613
- 36,890
Mr. Bambu has literally on edge since the Sera shitshow took place! How in God's name do you not know this?
Similar threads
