azontr
He/Him- 40,519
- 50,160
Yeah, I'm going to stop. I get very cranky when shit like this happens.Yeah, I'm starting to think this discussion is gonna go nowhere, better to let the bureaucrats and other staff talk about this now...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, I'm going to stop. I get very cranky when shit like this happens.Yeah, I'm starting to think this discussion is gonna go nowhere, better to let the bureaucrats and other staff talk about this now...
sameYeah, I'm starting to think this discussion is gonna go nowhere, better to let the bureaucrats and other staff talk about this now...
Because i dont talk to him everMr. Bambu has literally on edge since the Sera shitshow took place! How in God's name do you not know this?
Because not only was it kind of obvious, but he said so himself. And I'm the one who frankly is an awful social judge and I know that.And i was supposed to know this how? I barely talk to the guy
In no way your fault, shit just happens sometimes.But yeah, as the said admin that get flagged down for closing the thread, I really don't know what more to say here, except that I'm very sorry it had to be like this.
Thread isn't for these comments, take it elsewhere.What on earth happened here? Either way, this was a big oof for Weekly.
If it was a jokeHonestly it does seems like a joke. I doubt anyone will actually be willing to bribe someone for something trivial like that.
"Nobody likes Weekly" is hurting, defaming, and not the truth. It is not "calling out what needs to be called out".Nobody is attempting to hurt or defame weekly, but it is the truth Ant. This is in no way acceptable, and it warrants being called out for his shit.
Tho, it's ended what if he had apologised? Wouldn't he be forgiven?Nothing was coming out of this conversation. Weekly was given a chance to defend himself, but his defense was weak. I've applied the decided ban.
My badAnyway, I'd appreciate if people don't post reaction comments like "what on earth happened here" or "wow this is so bad" and such. Just reading the thread is enough to understand the situation. This is not a chat room. Thank you.
I mean, no offense to Weekly, but you'd have to be completely stupid to not only attempt to bribe a high ranking staff member you don't really know, but also do so in a public chat, this wasn't in DM's as far as I can see.I'm just going to quote Ovens:
"In case anyone still thinks Weekly paying Bambu is a joke, consider the fact that he was openly ready to pay for a waifu from the waifu bot (on discord) because someone else had it. He was genuinely upset someone took his waifu and started persuading them to give him the pixels on a screen in exchange for actual money."
Anyway, I'd appreciate if people don't post reaction comments like "what on earth happened here" or "wow this is so bad" and such. Just reading the thread is enough to understand the situation. This is not a chat room. Thank you.
The other thing was changing the word Accelerating to speeding up. 1 year is a bit too harsh for thatBut at the same time, I believe that Weekly should have been banned for other things a while ago, so the outcome shouldn't really change.
We took that into consideration. If he had really tried to bribe Bambu with undeniable proof and everything, that would have earned him an infinite ban. The one year is only because of a slim chance that he was not being literal. Bribe aside, desperately asking a calc mod to ignore stuff to skew with calcs and offering anything in return for that (even if not actual money) is still unacceptable behavior.Having known Weekly for longer than most people have even been on this site I am very confident that this was just a joking exaggeration. Again no one is going to actually bribe people over something this trivial and Weekly has never attempted to bribe someone in regards to revisions that he was far more personally invested. I think a year ban is a huge overreaction, especially given how dedicated Weekly has been. I do think there have been many situations he could have handled far better though, and understand where some complaints have come from. But this bribing thing is just silly in my opinion.
To be honest. It's possibly a joke and I don't see why anyone would bribe for fictional debates makes no sense and he was once a staff so It would have been better to forgive and overlook everything.Honestly it does seems like a joke. I doubt anyone will actually be willing to bribe someone for something trivial like that.
I am 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% Weekly has been warned for a lot of shit in the past. Probably a long time coming.To be honest. It's possibly a joke and I don't see why anyone would bribe for fictional debates makes no sense and he was once a staff so It would have been better to forgive and overlook everything.
Seems to be a bot or troll that goes around posting religious nonsense. I've seen this same thing on another forum.
I’d say tell him how we do things on this wikiHm, this user added a 2-B key to Sasha Necron some hours ago, while the key is true, it would need a CRT to add it first, however. someone already reverted the changes
I handled it.The edit is definitely not malicious going by the summary they wrote. I'd appreciate if someone can give them an instruction message about the rules.
Yes. All of this is very unfortunate.seems reasonable for weekly but i feel a little