• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

RPC AP issue

Wokistan

Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
Human Resources
16,877
7,334
Currently, RPC-286 is rated at 7-C for being compared to a fission reaction. The problem? Fission reactions aren't inherently tier 7.

This is a fission bomb. It's High 8-C to 8-B. Similarly, nuclear power plants don't generate tier 7 amounts of energy all are once.

Unless there is more support beyond that, a downgrade is in order.
 
I sort of agree, but fission reactions in general are somewhat vague.

Honestly, if I wanked it and ignored your point, a fission reaction from a plant would be higher then alot of older bombs. (IDK if it will go to the level of Castle Romeo or the Tsar Bomba.)

But yeah, I agree. A downgrade is in order unless we get further evidence for this matter.
 
I'm not saying that fission is only tier 8 so much as I am saying that a fission explosion can end up that low. On the other end of that spectrum wr do have tier 7 conventional explosives.

Castle bravo and Tsar Bomba are thermonuclear, so they work off of fusion.
 
This is on me, because I misread the article as nuclear fission rather than nuclear fusion and noted it down as such. I'll be changing it shortly. I'm still not sure where this would put it, but this discussion brings up some valid points.

Screenshot 2019-03-28 at 12.26.38 PM
 
Back
Top