- 19,174
- 6,463
People were objecting to type 3, either we include type 3 or add the note, cause just embodying a concept won't meet the current criteria for either type 1 or 2.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's just people giving the ability to characters that shouldn't have it.Antvasima said:Embodying a concept is traditionally all that has been required to qualify.
Well, I personally wouldn't mind including type 3 in the page in that case.Kaltias said:Type 3: These characters embody an abstraction, but can still be killed using normal means, because they are not reliant on it. However, they can control the abstraction itself and/or its manifestations.
^I was thinking about something like this
Hop will prepare the funeral.Kaltias said:Continued from this thread which died.
Are their existences in some way abstract, though?Kaltias said:About type 3, I think that adding it could be useful.
"Abstracts" who aren't necessarily immortal as long as their concept exist are a thing in fiction, and ignoring it feels wrong.
I think that type 3 should be something like "has a significant control over the concept because they embody it" or something like that.
I get the "it's superfluous" argument, but that applies to type 2 as well, because that is either type 8 or Mid-Godly
I mean, I would say that Type 2 isn't a truly abstract existence either; as I see it, the only difference is that a Type 2 abstract can regenerate from even total nonexistence as long as their respective abstraction exists.DontTalkDT said:Are their existences in some way abstract, though?Kaltias said:About type 3, I think that adding it could be useful.
"Abstracts" who aren't necessarily immortal as long as their concept exist are a thing in fiction, and ignoring it feels wrong.
I think that type 3 should be something like "has a significant control over the concept because they embody it" or something like that.
I get the "it's superfluous" argument, but that applies to type 2 as well, because that is either type 8 or Mid-Godly
Isn't this more being a represention of an abstraction, than it is having an abstract existence?
I mean, as I see it a Type 2 would basically have an abstract core / an abstract true self and just use/need physical vessels to interact with the physical world.Kaltias said:It really depends from how we want to define it, at the end of the day.
Like, the only characters truly abstract are those with type 1 anyway, someone with type 2 can be a physical being