-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rewriting the Abstract Existence page pt.2
- Thread starter Kaltias
- Start date
-
- Tags
- abstract existence
- Status
- 3,056
- 799
I still don't think we need type 3. It doesn't really sound like abstract existence tbh. They can literlally be affected/killed without the concept even being in the mix.
- 3,056
- 799
In my opinion, yes.
- 18,800
- 6,002
Type 3 probably isn't needed then, the others are fine.
- 7,017
- 1,076
I think a note like this should be good unless I misunderstood stuff
"Note: keep in mind that there are different levels of abstract existence that fall under the same type, depending on what a character embodies. For example, the embodiment of an idea is not on the same level as the embodiment of a concept, and being able to affect the former doesn't mean being able to affect the latter"
Or something like that
"Note: keep in mind that there are different levels of abstract existence that fall under the same type, depending on what a character embodies. For example, the embodiment of an idea is not on the same level as the embodiment of a concept, and being able to affect the former doesn't mean being able to affect the latter"
Or something like that
- 30,456
- 32,338
Looks good so far.
- 4,868
- 1,314
Stuff in the OP looks good. Genki's proposition does too.
- 21,783
- 4,826
What was this type 3 I keep hearing about?
- 21,783
- 4,826
Hmm
IMO both of those could be types.
IMO both of those could be types.
- 9,249
- 2,710
Another thing they would unironically have is that if you wanted to attack/destroy directly their concept, you would usually need type 3 Conceptual Manipulation rather than type 4.
Occasional, but still.
Occasional, but still.
- 15,181
- 9,574
I agree with everything so far that's been suggested in the thread
- 5,566
- 13,119
I am Neutral on Type 3 existing, though I do agree it seems a bit superfluous I would like to hear more input regarding it.
The rest seems fine, as is Genki's suggestion
The rest seems fine, as is Genki's suggestion
- 20,721
- 3,668
"Also, if we are regrouping various kinds of abstracts (ideas, concepts, possibilities etc) under a single term, would it be a good idea to specify that even if the type of AE is the same, the kind of abstractions also makes a difference?
For example killing a type 2 abstract reliant on an idea =/= killing a type 2 reliant on a concept"
My input:
"Beware that the abstract nature of different characters can stem from different sources (ideas, concepts, possibilities,...), as such, being able to affect a subtype of a category does not mean a character can affect all types of abstractions."
For example killing a type 2 abstract reliant on an idea =/= killing a type 2 reliant on a concept"
My input:
"Beware that the abstract nature of different characters can stem from different sources (ideas, concepts, possibilities,...), as such, being able to affect a subtype of a category does not mean a character can affect all types of abstractions."
- 15,499
- 11,509
The two types seem good to me.
- 21,783
- 4,826
Maybe switch "ideas" for "rumors".
Because ideas are very similar to concepts
Because ideas are very similar to concepts
- 12,631
- 2,400
seems legit really
- 32,343
- 20,268
Me.Ultima Reality said:
- 19,472
- 10,105
This looks pretty good.
- 19,122
- 6,334
- Thread starter
- #76
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Kaltias/Draft_of_the_new_Abstract_Existence_page
Made some edits based on the discussion so far, how does it look?
Made some edits based on the discussion so far, how does it look?
- 1,219
- 112
Seems real good
- 18,800
- 6,002
Looks good.
- Status
