- 2,485
- 309
- Thread starter
- #161
It's not specified regarding the timelines part, hence Low 2-C being the better rating, is what Kep believes I think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is why she is Low 2-C for sure and the the possibly is for the 2-C or 2-B statement.RegisNex1232 said:It's not specified regarding the timelines part, hence Low 2-C being the better rating, is what Kep believes I think.
Naga doesn't need to be DS Thresh, this is the part that really matters.RegisNex1232 said:Naga isn't DS Thresh, which is why I'm asking, given that they specified it for that skinline and not here.
Thing is all those timeliines are in the same universe and Naga exists is said universe.Kepekley23 said:Please provide scans.
And we don't assume Naga to be one with all the timelines, just with the one we know her to be. Without evidence there is simply no "possibly" to be warranted.
quoteRegisNex1232 said:There's nothing about timelines or whether Riot considers it regarding Naga.
All the timelines are in the same universe Ekko splitting up said universes would not make Naga not exists in the others.RegisNex1232 said:The thing is it's not stated anywhere that she's in all the timelines, which is what Kep is asking for.
The universe or reality is naga, Ekko explores all possibilities of Naga, Naga is a reality of multiple timelines since "All is Naga".Kepekley23 said:And...what does that have to do with Naga?
To destroy all of the universe in LoL destroying one timeline is not enough Thus Naga would still exist. To destroy her you would need to destroy all of the timelines. The timelines are all in 1 universe.Kepekley23 said:Please provide scans.
And we don't assume Naga to be one with all the timelines, just with the one we know her to be. Without evidence there is simply no "possibly" to be warranted.
And said universe has multiple timelines.Kepekley23 said:"Naga is all" only refers to one universe unless otherwise shown, since this is what Naga was stated to be.
Completely wrong that stright up means that she is at least 2-C. Low 2-C is 1 universe and timeline. Multiple realities in the same universe is 2-C.RegisNex1232 said:You'll have to quantify it with the Tiering system, and all that you've said is still not indicating anything beyond Low 2-C.
Pretty much, vaguely defined statements and extrapolation is generally less accurate than the relevant hard statements. And I'm still not seeing how multiple realities somehow equates to multiple universes.Assaltwaffle said:"Naga is all" isn't meant to encapsulate literally all of reality. It's for the primary universe, which we can be pretty sure Naga is. We need to just go with the safe option, which is Low 2-C.
which is why it is possibly. Also nothing that we said is vaguely defined, I dare you to point out a vaguely defined statement please, this seems to be your only argument. You might say extrapolation but at least that is kind of correct.RegisNex1232 said:Pretty much, vaguely defined statements and extrapolation is generally less accurate than the relevant hard statements. And I'm still not seeing how multiple realities somehow equates to multiple universes.
I'm pretty sure it's prohibited to ask writers to upgrade character ratings. Weekly did this once before and was told not to do this again.Heinkel Astrea said:While I'm not opposed to Low 2-C possibly 2-C today, my idea is that I will just ask Goulding some questions and see if we can instead make Naga 'At least 2-C, possibly X' in a few weeks.
So you are not allowed to ask, "does Nagakabouros embody the other realities of League of legends?". All they have to say is yes or no?RegisNex1232 said:I'm pretty sure it's prohibited to ask writers to upgrade character ratings. Weekly did this once before and was told not to do this again.