Revision of Nagakabouros's Tier

[Heinkel_Astrea]

Regis wants to, I know his tactic.

But give me a while. I will get some answers from Goulding or Odin to the question 'Does Nagakabouros encompass multiverse'. Probably asked word for word.

 

[RegisNex1232]

If you want to lie about it then sure. If you have actually read my post I have put Low 2-C, and I'm not sure how that is arguing for At most, unless you are not willing to read my posts.

And I'm not sure why we should take any answers you get just for the sake of upgrading Naga seriously, when people have tried in other verses and not succeeded.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

I just said you want to, but didn't.

Well the one who asked WB to put Naga back at the same rating she had this month last year rather than end up at the insulting galaxy level obviously succeeded, so yes.

 

[RegisNex1232]

Which is still a lie, hence the lying part.

Ah yes, because a lack of evidence clearly means that we should have gone by headcanon rather than reasonable estimates. Also, it's quite strange that you seem to find what is essentially numbers and letters so insulting that you would ask the creators questions just to get a higher, "cooler" rating.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

I would have used a more mellowed description, but that's what people thought it was so eh.

You think at most 'is fine', but is not fine. If you do think it's fine then I'm right to feel so.

There is no difference between the question of the Aatrox = capital G god killer guy, and my, question to the creators - a harmless question. No more, no less. That's it. A harmless question asked about what it takes to defeat Naga by players.

And it's achieved its purpose, that it's confirmed galaxy level can't defeat this guy. So it was for good purpose.

 

[RegisNex1232]

Assuming things when my posts say otherwise is clearly stupid. So kudos to you.

I don't care, since it's arguing over which words to use and I thought Schro making his own judgement was fine, since he is free to do so. It's still not going to change Low 2-C to anything else.

There is, when Riot has given an answer and this is looking to try to change that by adding A few careless letters, as you put it.

It's unlikely he could defeat Nagakabouros, he would need to end the universe.

to

It's unlikely he could defeat Nagakabouros, he would need to end the multiverse.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

Saying it sounds insulting is not an assumption. It's just what people feel.

A lot of verses use universe and multiverse interchangeably in normal conversations. It happens often in Marvel's century of history. So it's pretty harmless.

 

[RegisNex1232]

Again missing the point, when I'm referring to you assuming stuff about me and lying to everyone about it.

Except Riot has differentiated between the two and used universe rather than multiverse, which is telling.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

So you agree saying Naga is at most Low 2-C is in fact not fine?

The word multiverse was not used by any writers at all in June (like I said it happened extremely recently). So it's understandable there's no differentiation and it doesn't tell much.

 

[RegisNex1232]

Uh, yes, when Low 2-C was agreed on before that?

It's also understandable that they know what they meant when they said universe, and any guessing is ignoring the simplest possibility, that universe = universe.

And this is all derailing the discussion of the profile, to check for further inaccuracies.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

No one was pushing for "at most", though? Pretty much everyone here is saying Low 2-C outright.

This.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

http://i.imgur.com/oKa1iDa.jpg

Here is a feat for Infinity Gauntlet Thanos in Marvel:

Where it says
'Thanos is now mightier than Death herself.'
'More powerful than any force in the universe.'


But that also means 'More powerful than any force in the multiverse'.

So they are used interchangeably in normal conversations.

 

[Wokistan]

Why are you talking about marvel. This is LoL.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

It's completely context based. Riot usually has their heads wrapped around universe/multiverse stuff and we need to look at the context given. Given what we know Low 2-C fits the most.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

Marvel is publishing LoL comics (mainly written by Odin), which is where a lot of new feats are coming from. Maalcrom or Grena for example can easily toss Toyota trucks. I'm just saying asking questions about manner of speech is harmless.

 

[RegisNex1232]

Why are you talking about marvel. This is LoL.

Heinkel believes that Riot saying universe could mean that they were referring to the multiverse, like some Marvel writers have done so. This is despite Riot having clarified between the two for certain skinlines.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

This is despite Riot having clarified between the two for certain skinlines.

This happened only well after Odin answered the question in June. So it's understandable there was no differentiation back then.

 

[RegisNex1232]

It's completely context based. Riot usually has their heads wrapped around universe/multiverse stuff and we need to look at the context given. Given what we know Low 2-C fits the most.

You mean the best, right?

So back to the powers, should Superhuman Physical Characteristics be there?

 

[Wokistan]

Basically anyone above 9-C has it by default so yeah a low 2-C would get it.

 

[RegisNex1232]

It's also understandable that they knew about such stuff before releasing it when planning, so it's nothing but nitpicking to get a higher rating.

 

[RegisNex1232]

Basically anyone above 9-C has it by default so yeah a low 2-C would get it.

Some low 2-Cs don' have it, so I'm asking again.

Like this guy: "John_Doe"

 

[Wokistan]

A lot of files don't have it because people just forget it exists. Given that Naga is a universe, I would think it would have that.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

Û░£ýâêÙü╝Ùôñ Ùé┤Û░Ç ýù░ÙîÇ ýí©ýùàÝòÿÛ│á ÝàÉýä╝Ýè© ýØ╝ÝòÿÛ│á ý×êýØäÙòîÙÅä ÙûáÙôñÛ│á ý×êýØäÛ╣î ÒàïÒàïÒàï

Ah don't worry. I have a good plan. It will be accepted.

 

[RegisNex1232]

Again with the Korean about working at Tencent, are you that unwilling to say it in English?

 

[Assaltwaffle]

You know Google Translate is accurate enough to let us see what that is, right?

Honestly this "plan" and all this trying to be cryptic is getting ridiculous.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

No one knows I speak English.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

No one knows I speak English.

But you're speaking it now...

 

[RegisNex1232]

Ignoring Heinkel, @Assalt, is there anything else in the profile you find unexplained? If not, you can change it to the suggested rating of Low 2-C and add new explanations and powers.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

@Regis

I'll perform the changes in a bit. I think it looks better.

 

[Heinkel_Astrea]

There's no point otherwise. It's just a sentence or two.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

For speed being a sentient universe would be omnipresent, right?

 

[Wokistan]

Normally yeah but considering that other universes are a thing i'm not really sure.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

She's Omnipresent within her own universe and can influence multiple other universes

 

[Assaltwaffle]

I made the edit. See any problems?

 

[RegisNex1232]

Riot already said that below low-multiversal characters explicitly can't harm Nagakabouros.

WAAAARGHbobo 1 point┬À7 months ago

It's unlikely he could defeat Nagakabouros, he would need to end the universe.

You should have linked and used this in the explanation rather than the current justification.

 

[VoidGoji]

Hee conceptual manipulation isn't implied anywhere.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

Yeah, and it's gone.

 

[RegisNex1232]

I'm not seeing any of the links to statements given and the explanation given is also incomplete.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

If you link the explanation you want I can copy the source code.

 

[RegisNex1232]

To destroy Nagakabouros one would need to end the universe.


Just quote and copy the source code.