• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Revision of Nagakabouros's Tier

Regis wants to, I know his tactic.

But give me a while. I will get some answers from Goulding or Odin to the question 'Does Nagakabouros encompass multiverse'. Probably asked word for word.
 
If you want to lie about it then sure. If you have actually read my post I have put Low 2-C, and I'm not sure how that is arguing for At most, unless you are not willing to read my posts.

And I'm not sure why we should take any answers you get just for the sake of upgrading Naga seriously, when people have tried in other verses and not succeeded.
 
I just said you want to, but didn't.

Well the one who asked WB to put Naga back at the same rating she had this month last year rather than end up at the insulting galaxy level obviously succeeded, so yes.
 
Which is still a lie, hence the lying part.

Ah yes, because a lack of evidence clearly means that we should have gone by headcanon rather than reasonable estimates. Also, it's quite strange that you seem to find what is essentially numbers and letters so insulting that you would ask the creators questions just to get a higher, "cooler" rating.
 
I would have used a more mellowed description, but that's what people thought it was so eh.

You think at most 'is fine', but is not fine. If you do think it's fine then I'm right to feel so.

There is no difference between the question of the Aatrox = capital G god killer guy, and my, question to the creators - a harmless question. No more, no less. That's it. A harmless question asked about what it takes to defeat Naga by players.

And it's achieved its purpose, that it's confirmed galaxy level can't defeat this guy. So it was for good purpose.
 
Assuming things when my posts say otherwise is clearly stupid. So kudos to you.

I don't care, since it's arguing over which words to use and I thought Schro making his own judgement was fine, since he is free to do so. It's still not going to change Low 2-C to anything else.

There is, when Riot has given an answer and this is looking to try to change that by adding A few careless letters, as you put it.

It's unlikely he could defeat Nagakabouros, he would need to end the universe.

to

It's unlikely he could defeat Nagakabouros, he would need to end the multiverse.
 
Saying it sounds insulting is not an assumption. It's just what people feel.

A lot of verses use universe and multiverse interchangeably in normal conversations. It happens often in Marvel's century of history. So it's pretty harmless.
 
Again missing the point, when I'm referring to you assuming stuff about me and lying to everyone about it.

Except Riot has differentiated between the two and used universe rather than multiverse, which is telling.
 
So you agree saying Naga is at most Low 2-C is in fact not fine?

The word multiverse was not used by any writers at all in June (like I said it happened extremely recently). So it's understandable there's no differentiation and it doesn't tell much.
 
Uh, yes, when Low 2-C was agreed on before that?

It's also understandable that they know what they meant when they said universe, and any guessing is ignoring the simplest possibility, that universe = universe.

And this is all derailing the discussion of the profile, to check for further inaccuracies.
 
http://i.imgur.com/oKa1iDa.jpg

Here is a feat for Infinity Gauntlet Thanos in Marvel:

Where it says
'Thanos is now mightier than Death herself.'
'More powerful than any force in the universe.'


But that also means 'More powerful than any force in the multiverse'.

So they are used interchangeably in normal conversations.
 
Why are you talking about marvel. This is LoL.
 
Marvel is publishing LoL comics (mainly written by Odin), which is where a lot of new feats are coming from. Maalcrom or Grena for example can easily toss Toyota trucks. I'm just saying asking questions about manner of speech is harmless.
 
Wokistan said:
Why are you talking about marvel. This is LoL.
Click to expand...
Heinkel believes that Riot saying universe could mean that they were referring to the multiverse, like some Marvel writers have done so. This is despite Riot having clarified between the two for certain skinlines.
 
RegisNex1232 said:
This is despite Riot having clarified between the two for certain skinlines.
Click to expand...
This happened only well after Odin answered the question in June. So it's understandable there was no differentiation back then.
 
Assaltwaffle said:
It's completely context based. Riot usually has their heads wrapped around universe/multiverse stuff and we need to look at the context given. Given what we know Low 2-C fits the most.
Click to expand...
You mean the best, right?

So back to the powers, should Superhuman Physical Characteristics be there?
 
Basically anyone above 9-C has it by default so yeah a low 2-C would get it.
 
It's also understandable that they knew about such stuff before releasing it when planning, so it's nothing but nitpicking to get a higher rating.
 
A lot of files don't have it because people just forget it exists. Given that Naga is a universe, I would think it would have that.
 
Û░£ýâêÙü╝Ùôñ Ùé┤Û░Ç ýù░ÙîÇ ýí©ýùàÝòÿÛ│á ÝàÉýä╝Ýè© ýØ╝ÝòÿÛ│á ý×êýØäÙòîÙÅä ÙûáÙôñÛ│á ý×êýØäÛ╣î ÒàïÒàïÒàï

Ah don't worry. I have a good plan. It will be accepted.
 
You know Google Translate is accurate enough to let us see what that is, right?

Honestly this "plan" and all this trying to be cryptic is getting ridiculous.
 
Ignoring Heinkel, @Assalt, is there anything else in the profile you find unexplained? If not, you can change it to the suggested rating of Low 2-C and add new explanations and powers.
 
Normally yeah but considering that other universes are a thing i'm not really sure.
 
Heinkel Astrea said:
Riot already said that below low-multiversal characters explicitly can't harm Nagakabouros.

WAAAARGHbobo 1 point┬À7 months ago

It's unlikely he could defeat Nagakabouros, he would need to end the universe.
Click to expand...
You should have linked and used this in the explanation rather than the current justification.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

League of Legends Zilean tier upgrade
Replies
2
Views
483
Algaron114
Shiedaisthepeak
League Of Legends Tier 1 Upgrade!
2
Replies
59
Views
3K
Protector_Hunk
Protector_Hunk
Baabasaplar95
League of Legends profile fixes
Replies
12
Views
926
Baabasaplar95
Baabasaplar95
Shiedaisthepeak
  • Locked
  • Article
League Of Legends Odyssey Kayn Upgrade
Replies
36
Views
2K
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Franstel
  • Locked
CRT: Fire Emblem Awakening massive manakete revision
Replies
19
Views
1K
Franstel
Franstel
Back
Top