- 8,438
- 3,294
@Kep
Meant 2-C. Misclicked 2-B.
Meant 2-C. Misclicked 2-B.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The best I can guess is extrapolation from Illaoi, though it's not like Naga is very active at all to use some of these.Assaltwaffle said:So. About Naga's powers and abilities section...
It sucks. It doesn't offer much and some of the stuff it does offer is wrong (possibly Concept Manip from what exactly?). It needs some solve while we're at it.
This is assuming that the universe is sentient/has a will of sorts. It could very well be Naga just acting as if it were the universe, with Illaoi not knowing any better.Assaltwaffle said:The universe demanded it, even though it was Nagakabouros' philosophy and who he faced.
The universe was interchangeable with Nagakabouros.
Pointing out the flimsy supportive 'feats' you are providing as justification for 2-C is jumping through hoops now? Especially when this incorrect rating came about entirely from you making it up. Asking for more is only natural in this case when you've not met the standard earlier.WeeklyBattles said:The entire purpose of illaoi is to fully understand what nagakabouros truly is. That is her sole purpose for existing in this story.
Seriously, now you're trying to find jump through hoops to delegitimize blatant feats for no reason when everyone else agrees with them
The feats aren't that, they're extrapolations of statements made that can still mean a lot of things and for now are not fully defined. So it's hard to say "Unknown, Possibly 2-C" when 2-C itself is not fully defined either. Making it between 3-B to 2-C would be more accurate as we have a more solid lower mark for Naga from Aurelion Sol and the statements for the higher end.WeeklyBattles said:Appeal to motive, good way to help your case
The feats presented meet the standards of everyone but yours.
3-B has just as much, if not more evidence for it, and it's hardly downplay when it's going to be a Possible tier, coming after Unknown. This is simply not accepting other feats you dislike for no reason.WeeklyBattles said:@Regis 3-B is not happening, everyone is unanimously against it and it's horrendous downplay
Low 2-C has more than enough evidence to back it up
I'm arguing for Unknown, At Least 3-B to Low 2-C (insert explanation). Sorry if you don't like it but the feats and statements shown support this far more than a blank Low 2-C that you seem to have backtracked to after failing to find more evidence.WeeklyBattles said:Regis you are literally the only one arguing for anything other than Low 2-C. Sorry if you dont like the rating but the changes have been agreed on.
After reading through this, it's basically a range of 3-B to Low 2-C statements?Kepekley23 said:2-B shouldn't be a possibility. It shouldn't be there at all. It is unbacked.
3-B is a low-end.
I also disagree with 2-C. None of the statements are 2-C. They're Low 2-C statements in their high-end.