- 1,281
- 150
Why do they have type 9 instead of type 8?For his Avatar yes. Immortality type 9 makes him incredibly difficult to kill.
I believe there should be a note under his durability about it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do they have type 9 instead of type 8?For his Avatar yes. Immortality type 9 makes him incredibly difficult to kill.
I believe there should be a note under his durability about it
Type 8 is reliant immortalityBecause there's no feats of that
Ehh, that's the same role type 9 plays. You're focusing too much on numbers manYeah the thread is create. I will going to sleep. See you tomorrow
You replied to the wrong personEhh, that's the same role type 9 plays. You're focusing too much on numbers man
Nobody else really cares about what fixxed is sayingType 9 Immortality is the Immortality a character gets when it is created and controlled by another being. It's effectiveness is dependent on the nature of the being controlling them, this case being a Low 1-C true form.
Also, let's stop all this mudslinging and complaining about others, regardless of what has happened this won't solve anything and you should just leave it for staff to look at if it's so obvious.
No...just no dude...Y'all better chill unless you want the mods to feel bad for fixxed, join their side and nerf Arceus for no reason
The unfortunate fate of Arceus low 1C keyY'all better chill unless you want the mods to feel bad for fixxed, join their side and nerf Arceus for no reason
This is a spite CRT lmao, staff just approved these abilities 2 days agoY'all better chill unless you want the mods to feel bad for fixxed, join their side and nerf Arceus for no reason
Arceus eventually if the CRT keeps upThe unfortunate fate of Arceus low 1C key
We need to give him NEPNobody else really cares about what fixxed is saying
It's just as I said
"It will be ignored"
I am not saying this will happen but i am saying y'all should stop making it look like a bunch of people bullying anotherNo...just no dude...
I consider myself a Villain so yeah...I am not saying this will happen but i am saying y'all should stop making it look like a bunch of people bullying another
And it not transdual from what i know, i ask DT for that and he says onesess alone is not transdualityTransduality (Or Nonduality as I intend to change the name) typically defines a being whom is without distinction. In Arceus' instance he is the unity which precedes creation and its distinctive attributes. Arceus is fundamentally Nondual.
The requirement of NEP 2 is state of nonexistanceIn regard to Nonexistent Physiology Nature Type 2, no. He is without the distinction of existence and nonexistence, which is the actual prerequisite of Nature Type 2. He is absent from the 0 of nonexistence and the 1 of existence, for only in the emanation of the world did this dichotomy actualize.
The character must doesn't exist beyond nothingness it self, so the character must have nonexistance stateIdealistic Nonexistence: The character doesn't exist in a sense further beyond conventional nonexistence. In terms of binary, this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence. Characters of this type often have some low degree of Transduality due to their lack of binary existence. Characters of this type have to behave at least as nonexistent as those with Material Nonexistence, but might display even further showings such as preceding or opposing existence.
Here you goi'll wait for the OP to respond as well, ig, before closing
And it not transdual from what i know, i ask DT for that and he says onesess alone is not transduality
The requirement of NEP 2 is state of nonexistance
The character must doesn't exist beyond nothingness it self, so the character must have nonexistance state
He said "if they don't have transcendence as well, they wouldn't be transdual" one comment above yours, which he does, and Elizhaa said it qualifies too. Anyway, I don't think you should call DT for this, since (at least according to the previous CRT) it was said he's not interested in pokemon crts rnAnd it not transdual from what i know, i ask DT for that and he says onesess alone is not transduality
I don't exactly know what do you mean with this, but, NEP2 can be argued as a subset of TD2, and Arceus is the chaos which existed before/trascends existence (physical or metaphysical) and nonexistence. And, as said in Nonexistent Physiology Page:The requirement of NEP 2 is state of nonexistance
The character must doesn't exist beyond nothingness it self, so the character must have nonexistance state
If Arceus existed before the existence of existence and nonexistence and/or trascends them, he's (obviously) neither 1 nor 0The character doesn't exist in a sense further beyond conventional nonexistence. In terms of binary, this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence. Characters of this type often have some low degree of Transduality due to their lack of binary existence. Characters of this type have to behave at least as nonexistent as those with Material Nonexistence, but might display even further showings such as preceding or opposing existence.
The argument for arceus' transduality is onesess, and i just reply shiva statement that says onesess is can get transduality. The requirement for TD 2 it self is transcend all duality system can you give proof that arceus transcend all duality?? Or can you give proof, where in pokemon verse that mention all duality system??He said "if they don't have transcendence as well, they wouldn't be transdual" one comment above yours, which he does, and Elizhaa said it qualifies too. Anyway, I don't think you should call DT for this, since (at least according to the previous CRT) it was said he's not interested in pokemon crts rn
I don't exactly know what do you mean with this, but, NEP2 can be argued as a subset of TD2, and Arceus is the chaos which existed before/trascends existence (physical or metaphysical) and nonexistence. And, as said in Nonexistent Physiology Page:
The main problem is are arceus a nonexistance??? Because NEP 2 must doesn't exist, that the page says and the staff dis of saysIf Arceus existed before the existence of existence and nonexistence
The whole point of NEP 2 is that it is neither existence nor non-existence, so a character that strictly doesn’t exist would not qualify for NEP 2, Arceus predates and/or transcends both existence and non-existence, and thus cannot file under either, which means it’s NEP 2The main problem is are arceus a nonexistance??? Because NEP 2 must doesn't exist, that the page says and the staff dis of says
That’s like 10 months old, people can learn stuff lol, if they were not knowledgable on transduality why would they comment on a part of a CRT adding transduality?Yeah and elizha says she not knowledgeable about transduality
https://vsbattles.com/threads/touho...ecatia-from-touhou-series.123798/post-4126582
The requirement for TD 2 it self is transcend all duality system
Also the whole “where’s the proof?” segment of your rebuttal is silly, Pokémon supporters didn’t sprinkle pixie dust on staff members and get them to agree with major ability additions without any scans or evidence a matter of days agocharacters who transcend duality at a basic level would also qualify for this level, as space and time can be thought of as dual concepts, as well as existing within/outside spatio-temporal dimensionality.
1. DT is incorrect, because you didn't even grant the greater context.And it not transdual from what i know, i ask DT for that and he says onesess alone is not transduality
The requirement of NEP 2 is state of nonexistance
The character must doesn't exist beyond nothingness it self, so the character must have nonexistance state
I put this CRT in the RVR Thread as honestly there’s just so many things wrong with the fact it was made and how it has been argued past the OPThis is a CRT looking to overturn the results of a very recent CRT with no new scans or evidence, using quite frankly incorrect information about abilities, the way you worded your question to DT and didn’t give context is sus, and all of this is in likelihood because you want Anos to beat Arceus, which doesn’t even happen if this stuff gets removed afaik...?
The fact this has to even be argued is...
Shush@Fixxed you have lost!
OkShush
And the page it self says "the character doesn't exist"The whole point of NEP 2 is that it is neither existence nor non-existence, so a character that strictly doesn’t exist would not qualify for NEP 2, Arceus predates and/or transcends both existence and non-existence, and thus cannot file under either, which means it’s NEP 2
So why elizha comment in touhou CRT that add transduality??? Your logic is false hereThat’s like 10 months old, people can learn stuff lol, if they were not knowledgable on transduality why would they comment on a part of a CRT adding transduality?
So where the proof of "all duality system"??? That the basic requirement for get TD 2Also the whole “where’s the proof?” segment of your rebuttal is silly, Pokémon supporters didn’t sprinkle pixie dust on staff members and get them to agree with major ability additions without any scans or evidence a matter of days ago
Why DT is incorrect?? I ask him for onesess, just it, why i must give greater context??? i dont says about pokemon or anything else, just about onesess1. DT is incorrect, because you didn't even grant the greater context.
The character doesn't exist2. The character doesn't exist in a sense further beyond conventional nonexistence. In terms of binary, this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence. Characters of this type often have some low degree of Transduality due to their lack of binary existence. Characters of this type have to behave at least as nonexistent as those with Material Nonexistence, but might display even further showings such as preceding or opposing existence.
...........i do not recommend this, better defend your side of argument rather than putting it in RVR thread, regardless of OP's intention. You can report him or her after the CRT what ever you want, but before that should focus on the CRT instead caring about reporting peopleI put this CRT in the RVR Thread as honestly there’s just so many things wrong with the fact it was made and how it has been argued past the OP
Yes but the way you tabled it made it seem like Arceus transcending the binary of existence and non-existence was not NEP 2, it was misleadingAnd the page it self says "the character doesn't exist"
I quoted the wiki page for TD 2 which shows transcending time and space can also work for those below 1-A... (At least I believe that’s what the page interprets, please do forgive me if I’m incorrect here)So where the proof of "all duality system"??? That the basic requirement for get TD 2
Arceus transcends and/or predates existence and non-existence, that’s NEP 2, obviously if Arceus transcends/predates existence they themselves do not existThe character doesn't exist
This thread shouldn’t even be up, the changes OP is trying to strip away were accepted by staff and applied 2 days ago, and they (OP) haven’t brought forth any new scans/evidence. This is just an extension of an already concluded CRT for petty reasons using dubious means...........i do not recommend this, better defend your side of argument rather than putting it in RVR thread, regardless of OP's intention. You can report him or her after the CRT what ever you want, but before that should focus on the CRT instead caring about reporting people