-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Regarding the name "Outerverse level"
- Thread starter Ultima_Reality
- Start date
- 19,236
- 6,517
I am ok with Beyond Dimensional and Beyond Dimensional+.
- 16,606
- 1,791
Ryukama said:
well the term is all over the vs community on Google+, just saying. Tho doesn't really make much of a difference
- 16,606
- 1,791
Beyond Dimensional+ just sounds really forced and kinda dumb. I think High Beyond Dimensional sounds better
- 8,438
- 3,294
Imo "High Beyond Dimensional" sounds pretty bulky and also forced. I know it breaks it up, but if we are already breaking away from "level" with "dimensionless," could High 1-A be "Near-Limitless" or something similar? Pretty much gets the point of High 1-A across perfectly.
But I understand if people think that sounds inconsistent or similarly dumb; this is just my opinion on the matter.
But I understand if people think that sounds inconsistent or similarly dumb; this is just my opinion on the matter.
- 1,280
- 1,123
Just so we're clear, we are going to keep the Outerverse page, right?
It's still pretty important in elaborating on 1-A.
It's still pretty important in elaborating on 1-A.
- 1,280
- 1,123
Also, I would like to point you to High 5-A.Antvasima said:
- 1,280
- 1,123
Thing is, "Extradimensional" already refers to Tier 1 in general.
- 168,579
- 77,394
@KingPin
You have a point about High 5-A, but nevertheless, it is hard enough to come up with a viable alternative name for the 1-A tier as a whole. Using different titles seems unnecessary and confusing.
You have a point about High 5-A, but nevertheless, it is hard enough to come up with a viable alternative name for the 1-A tier as a whole. Using different titles seems unnecessary and confusing.
- 1,280
- 1,123
I mean... I don't know how many 1-A profiles we have on here.
I'm already aware of quite a few (Cthulhu Mythos Top Tiers, basically everyone in Masadaverse, Akuto Sai, etc.), so this will need quite a bit of effort if this goes through.
Also, "High Beyond Dimensional" and "Beyond Dimensional+" both feel very weird to me and certainly quite a few others, even if just "Beyond Dimensional" for regular 1-A is currently being supported.
That said, "Near-Limitless" or anything similar to that likely won't work either, if only because Tier 0 is not "Limitless", but "True Infinity".
I'm already aware of quite a few (Cthulhu Mythos Top Tiers, basically everyone in Masadaverse, Akuto Sai, etc.), so this will need quite a bit of effort if this goes through.
Also, "High Beyond Dimensional" and "Beyond Dimensional+" both feel very weird to me and certainly quite a few others, even if just "Beyond Dimensional" for regular 1-A is currently being supported.
That said, "Near-Limitless" or anything similar to that likely won't work either, if only because Tier 0 is not "Limitless", but "True Infinity".
- 1,280
- 1,123
Right. I'll stop being a bother.
- 15,332
- 7,563
I disagree completely with changing it just because it's something we made up.
- 16,606
- 1,791
Kepekley23 said:
exactly
- 168,579
- 77,394
So, we seem to have settled on one issue here: Multi-Universe level should be changed to Small Multiverse level or Low Multiverse level.
But we appear to be undecided regarding whether we should keep Outerverse level or change it to Beyond Dimensional.
But we appear to be undecided regarding whether we should keep Outerverse level or change it to Beyond Dimensional.
- 32,359
- 20,298
Beyond Dimensional sounds clunky imo. I prefer Outerverse over it.
- 16,606
- 1,791
Low Multiversal sounds better than small multiverse (since since actual size isn't as accurate when describing the levels of power in many cases).
Perhaps they can be used interchangably? Outerverse is a good centralised way to describe beyond dimensional locations such as The Meta World (I/O), Beyond The Throne (Masadaverse), The various gates (Cthulhu Mythos), The Over Moniter (DC), The One Above All's Heaven (Marvel), etc. There is no centralised way to describe these locations, and simply calling them Beyond Dimensional would imply that they are the same as the void itself, which they are not by necesity. Such as TOAA's Heaven vs Oblivion itself
On a semi-related note, are certain types of Non-Euclidean space considered Outerversal?
Perhaps they can be used interchangably? Outerverse is a good centralised way to describe beyond dimensional locations such as The Meta World (I/O), Beyond The Throne (Masadaverse), The various gates (Cthulhu Mythos), The Over Moniter (DC), The One Above All's Heaven (Marvel), etc. There is no centralised way to describe these locations, and simply calling them Beyond Dimensional would imply that they are the same as the void itself, which they are not by necesity. Such as TOAA's Heaven vs Oblivion itself
On a semi-related note, are certain types of Non-Euclidean space considered Outerversal?
- 32,359
- 20,298
Low Multiverse level is better than Small.
Because it fits better with Low Complex Multiverse and Low Hyperverse.
Because it fits better with Low Complex Multiverse and Low Hyperverse.
- 15,332
- 7,563
I'm in.
Similar threads
