• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Regarding the name "Outerverse level"

If most prefer one of those over outerverse yes
 
@Celestial Pegasus

Okay. Thank you for the input.
 
Ryukama said:
With all due respect to DarkLK, while outerverse may be clearly defined, it is something he entirely made up. It's not a thing literally anywhere but this wiki. I'll always be opposed to having terms we ourselves created from thin air used in our tiering system. Especially a term as in my personal opinion silly sounding as adding "verse" to the word outer.
Click to expand...


well the term is all over the vs community on Google+, just saying. Tho doesn't really make much of a difference
 
Imo "High Beyond Dimensional" sounds pretty bulky and also forced. I know it breaks it up, but if we are already breaking away from "level" with "dimensionless," could High 1-A be "Near-Limitless" or something similar? Pretty much gets the point of High 1-A across perfectly.

But I understand if people think that sounds inconsistent or similarly dumb; this is just my opinion on the matter.
 
Just so we're clear, we are going to keep the Outerverse page, right?

It's still pretty important in elaborating on 1-A.
 
If we decide to change the Outerverse name, we will still keep the explanation page, yes, but we would have to rename it.
 
Beyond Dimensional can be called as a single word "Extradimensional", since prefix -extra means "outside, beyond".
 
@KingPin

You have a point about High 5-A, but nevertheless, it is hard enough to come up with a viable alternative name for the 1-A tier as a whole. Using different titles seems unnecessary and confusing.
 
I mean... I don't know how many 1-A profiles we have on here.

I'm already aware of quite a few (Cthulhu Mythos Top Tiers, basically everyone in Masadaverse, Akuto Sai, etc.), so this will need quite a bit of effort if this goes through.

Also, "High Beyond Dimensional" and "Beyond Dimensional+" both feel very weird to me and certainly quite a few others, even if just "Beyond Dimensional" for regular 1-A is currently being supported.

That said, "Near-Limitless" or anything similar to that likely won't work either, if only because Tier 0 is not "Limitless", but "True Infinity".
 
Well, as I have mentioned previously, we are technically creating a problem out of nothing here, and do not have any particularly good alternatives to the current name.
 
Anyway, this is technically a staff only thread.
 
There's also "un-dimension" if you wanna follow yet again the Lovecraftian route and if one word is preferable

limitless, boundless and infinity have similar meanings and would also achieve the same effect if attached with "true" or "absolute"
 
Ryu re-opened this thread just to give his final opinion. That doesn't mean this thread should still be opened. He gave his piece and even dropped the topic after that. This should be re-closed.
 
Well, I really appreciate Ryukama, do not want any conflict with him, and do not know if the topic has been settled yet.
 
That said, we should preferably stay strictly on topic, without sidetracks.
 
There is no conflict at all. As I've said many times I'm completely fine with whatever everyone else agrees upon. I was just giving my personal opinion.
 
So, we seem to have settled on one issue here: Multi-Universe level should be changed to Small Multiverse level or Low Multiverse level.

But we appear to be undecided regarding whether we should keep Outerverse level or change it to Beyond Dimensional.
 
Low Multiversal sounds better than small multiverse (since since actual size isn't as accurate when describing the levels of power in many cases).

Perhaps they can be used interchangably? Outerverse is a good centralised way to describe beyond dimensional locations such as The Meta World (I/O), Beyond The Throne (Masadaverse), The various gates (Cthulhu Mythos), The Over Moniter (DC), The One Above All's Heaven (Marvel), etc. There is no centralised way to describe these locations, and simply calling them Beyond Dimensional would imply that they are the same as the void itself, which they are not by necesity. Such as TOAA's Heaven vs Oblivion itself

On a semi-related note, are certain types of Non-Euclidean space considered Outerversal?
 
@Matthew

That is true. Keeping the pattern is preferable.
 
Still, somebody would have to start and organise a revision thread for all 2-C profiles, and find enough staff members who are willing to help out, as it would be quite a lot of work.
 
Well, given that all 2-C profiles are locked, it would be easiest if the Administrators and Content Moderators handle it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Wankbreaker
  • Locked
Tier 2 hotfix.
Replies
25
Views
3K
DarkDragonMedeus
DarkDragonMedeus
Fixxed
  • Locked
Bigger infinity should be uncountable infinity
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Antvasima
Antvasima
CNBA3
What does 4-D beings qualify as?
Replies
5
Views
463
Digital_Franz
Digital_Franz
Fixxed
  • Locked
Higher D by Transcending Infinite/all level of Power and Existential
Replies
7
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Ultima_Reality
  • Locked
The Dread Tiering System Revisions
4 5 6
Replies
216
Views
39K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top