- 1,632
- 351
I perfer "Outerversal" over "Dimensionless". To me, to say something is Dimensionless implies that it is 11-C. It also doesn't help that Outerversal is logically nonsensical. What I mean by that is, it's logically impossible for an actual outerverse to exist. (this is something that's by definition, beyond science and human comprehension). It's like trying to say a round square exists. Where as it's reasonably possible that a Hilbert Space could exists. And if one doesn't exists, it at least can still be defined logically and mathematically.
I guess the point I'm trying to make is, it's a fruiltess effort to try to give a logical term to something that's is suppose to be beyond science, math and logic. I think that no matter what alternative term we think of, there will always be some issue that can be pointed out.
Besides, the word "verse" doesn't have to mean a realm with a dimension and structure. That's thinking too deeply into it. It can simply mean a realm that makes up existence, or a significant part of existence. An outerverse in any fictional setting, makes up all of existence within that setting. That's all that's needed to be considered a legitimate "verse".
I guess the point I'm trying to make is, it's a fruiltess effort to try to give a logical term to something that's is suppose to be beyond science, math and logic. I think that no matter what alternative term we think of, there will always be some issue that can be pointed out.
Besides, the word "verse" doesn't have to mean a realm with a dimension and structure. That's thinking too deeply into it. It can simply mean a realm that makes up existence, or a significant part of existence. An outerverse in any fictional setting, makes up all of existence within that setting. That's all that's needed to be considered a legitimate "verse".
