• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Regarding the name "Outerverse level"

I was thinking something like "impossiverse" Came up with the idea when thinking of universes that shouldn't be capable of existing.
 
Ogurtsow said:
1-A can't be extra-dimensional as they don't have any dimensions whatsoever.

In fact they can't be any-dimensional.

Yes, I know that. Prefix extra- means "outside, beyond". This means that extradimensional characters outside concept of dimensions. Word "Extraverse" can mean special space that beyond any other -verses (except infinite-dimensional hyperverse). Therefore, I believe that Extraverse should be fine.
Click to expand...
The problem is that the Tier 1 itself is called "Extradimensional", and it's also already used for any Higher dimensional entity.
 
I honestly prefer Extraverse/Extraversal. It fits with our names (That is, having -verse as the suffix) and fits with what 1-A means.

And I swear to God if someone denies it because "extradimensional is used to describe a lot of things"...
 
The reason for the proposal of the change was because Outerverse level didn't make sense because of the -verse suffix being at the end of it. I think hyperdimensional is better, seeing as most uses of it in-context are referring to the characters being "beyond higher dimensions".
 
I think Extraversal for 1-A, and Transcendent/Transcendental for High 1-As is fine.
 
Transcendental can be used to describe way too many things and already conflicts with 1-A's name.

"High Extraverse" or "Extraverse level+" is fine.
 
The whole issue tmk is that Outerverse has the word "verse" in it. But the issue there is the fact that being a "verse" or "realm" doesn't disprove an outerverse. An outerverse is still a universe, it just happens to be adimensional.
 
"Extraverse" is even worse than Outerverse. If Transcendent is too vague, use "Meta-Transcendent". Or...just leave Outerverse alone. Again, High Outerverse should just be Outerverse+
 
Im just going to ask everyone to actually take this seriously and try to be helpful if you arent already. Otherwise this will br moved to staff only.
 
"Subjective Infinity" can be used for even Low 2-C.
 
This thread is turning into completely out of control chaos, as I expected it to when kept open for non-staff members.

I will move it to the staff forum. Others should only reply if they have a very good suggestion for a name.

I still think that Outerverse is fine, as the entire point of selecting it is that it is a name that isn't used for anything else, and as such can mean whatever we want to define it as.

As noted earlier, it also references the nature of the outer gods, and being outside and beyond all "verse" constructs.

But if that doesn't work, I suppose that "Dimensionless" is better than nothing, as the term won't be confused with something else.

I also do not particularly mind if we rename "True Infinity" to "Absolute Infinity", as I think that Ryukama suggested, but it doesn't flow quite as well to me.
 
Never mind. On second thought, I agree with Sera, and prefer if we keep True Infinity.
 
You have a point. Well, 2-C should be Low Multiverse level, 1-A should be Hyperdimensional, and High 1-A should be either Hyperdimensional+ or something new entirely.

Either that, or Outerverse level is just fine, and High 1-A either stays the same or gets changed to Outerverse level+.
 
Extraverse sounds considerably worse than Outerverse imho, and again, hyper is a specific scientific term for higher dimensions.
 
I disagree with changing anything (other than Multi-Universal) to begin with. I'll make a post detailing why I believe we should keep Outerverse and be done with it..
 
In any case, rushing into drastic changes to something that has worked quite well for us, with no better alternative available, never sits right with me.
 
This thread turned into a pile of mess

So what now is supposed to be changed is 2-C and not 1-A anymore?
 
I agree with changing 2-C to Low Multiverse level. However, I agree with Ant, DarkLK and Sera that 1-A should be kept as Outerverse level, and I'll make a case for it.
 
Hyperdimensional/Superdimensional cannot be used, it's the same thing as "Higher-Dimensional".

Like Ever said, we aren't using "Dense Star level" now are we? No. Accurate =/= better. Multi-Universe however, is contradictory. As even two universes is a small multiverse. Low Multiverse works fine.

I used to agree with this, but after seeing how tedious it got, it's best to leave 1-A alone. High Outerverse can stay too, I suppose. Only thing that needs attention is 2-C.
 
Yes, the last selection thread also turned into a mess until DarkLK finally came up with the Outerverse name, which was not used for anything else, gave a general idea of what was intended, and could not be misunderstood.

I am fine with revising the 2-C Multi-Universe title though. That one genuinely is inappropriate.
 
Just a reminder these are just my opinions and suggestions. I'm perfectly fine with everyone feeling otherwise.

1. Change Multi-Universe level to Low Multiverse

2. Change Outerverse to Transcendent, Boundless, Dimensionless or Hyperdimensional (I personally like the last two the best)

3. I like Absolute Infinity since that's the name ofa mathematical and philosophical concept of an infinity that cannot be matched or surpassed by any quantity, infinite or transfinite. As it is the nature of God. Of course there is nothing at all wrong with True Infinity and that can stay.
 
Thank you for the support Sera and Kepekley. I am afraid that I have to go to bed very soon, so I hope that this thread does not impose highly inappropriate changes in the meantime.
 
I also agree with DontTalk. I made the Outerverse page. So we clearly have a definition and usage for the term.
 
ALso, can we talk about the names of tier 2-A and High 2-A?

If 3-A is "Universal" and 2-B is "Multiversal", then since tier High 3-A is "High Universal" and Tier Low 2-C is "Universal +", then shouldn't tier 2-A be "High Multiversal", and tier High 2-A be "Multiversal +"?

Just a minor nitpick
 
Transcendent is a far too limited description for something of this scale, Boundless is already used to refer to tier 0 in the tiering system page, and hyperdimensional simply means higher-dimensional, so I am afraid that all of them are illogical options.

Dimensionless could technically work, but sounds more like 11-C than 1-A.
 
@DMB 1

Our tiering system does not need to follow set patterns, and it would take several days to change all of the necessary pages. This would also distract our staff from more important tasks such as revisions for popular verses or the Tier 4 revisions.

Essentially dividing the little time we have to fix a nitpick that causes no problems or confusions is something I'm 100% against.
 
What about "True Multiverse Level?" No seriously! Technically Outerverses can be included in a multiverse depending on the structure of said multiverse. The highest structured Multiverses have infinite possibilities and impossibilities. This would naturally include undimensional ones too. A great example of this is tbe Type IV Multiverse.

Yet usually a multiverse is just infinite universes. Idk why, but for some reason "True Multiversal" just has this ring to it. It sorta sounds right.

"EDIT" Whoops. I did not notice the Ants comment about moving this to staff. My bad.
 
No problem. Don't worry, no bad suggestions are getting pass us.
 
1-A can also be described as "boundless". It's not really something that has to be exclusive to Tier 0. I agree with hyperdimensional after looking up its official definition. Dimensionless I still see as fine.

Either way I don't want use to just take a word, add "verse" to it and act like it's a real thing. I think our Tiering System should be a bit more sophisticated than that. And what's the point of always bashing stuff like "Megaverse", "Omniverse", "Superverse", etc. if we're going to essentially do the same thing?
 
@DMB

Possibly. Or High Universe level and Universe level+ could switch places with the same logic, but as DontTalk mentioned, I don't think that it is really worth the effort, now that all our members have grown used to the current system.
 
I personally believe the "what's the point of bashing X if we're going to do Y" argument does not follow & will address it as soon as I can.
 
@Ryukama

I love Hyperdimensional, but the problem is the definition for Hyperdimensional is anything above 3-dimensional. I fear it would only cause contradictions.

Beyond Dimensional sounds better for 1-A as Dimensionless is 11-C.

Attack Potency: Beyond Dimensional

Doesn't look too bad at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Wankbreaker
  • Locked
Tier 2 hotfix.
Replies
25
Views
5K
DarkDragonMedeus
DarkDragonMedeus
DontTalkDT
Context is always important - Changing a bad formulation of the Tiering System
Replies
31
Views
4K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Fixxed
  • Locked
Bigger infinity should be uncountable infinity
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Locked
Bleach - Garganta - Potential Evidence of been a Higher Dimension
Replies
20
Views
2K
ReaperAndBlues
ReaperAndBlues
Protector_Hunk
Tiering Question
Replies
6
Views
472
Astral_Trinity439
Astral_Trinity439
Back
Top