- 26,331
- 3,127
Faulty votes aren't making CH remain
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which is exactly why content revisions shouldn't be based off of a voting system. One solid argument trumps numerous arguments that miss the point, especially when some of those voters have likely been countered by this point, from either side. Liking Composite Human alone doesn't excuse it from going against our policies.I'm Blue daba dee daba die said:it's their choice for why they vote disagree.
Domestic cat feel like a composite profile for cat. And the bee page get renamed for be composite page.Walker21232123 said:Domestic Cat Should deatle or renamed that cat in the picture because we are not allow to make Domestic Dog.
look herePaulo.junior.969 said:Animal profiles mostly just incorporate universal characteristics most members of the species have, so its not really a composite, or at least not even nearly as much as CH.
Oh lord, people would be even more pissed off if the justification for removal was "Well, more staff agreed to it compared to regular people."Yobo Blue said:Technically most of the staff are in favor of removal </div>
Paulo.junior.969 said:Actually, before we start to remove votes, we'll have to decide what kind of votes are and are not valid to begin with. So let's try to get to an agreement:
Anyone asking for an exception to be made for CH without giving an actual reason (like saying "it's popular", or "it's fun") is out of the vote count. Anyone who says "FRA" but doesn't explain why is also out (for both sides).
What do you guys think?