- 14,863
- 12,354
You can read this thread for more details.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
References for Common Feats Requests and Evaluations Thread 3
- Thread starter Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan
- Start date
- Status
- 5,106
- 2,543
It looks more like a spike ball really.Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan said:
It doesn't have the shape of a fist, it just weren't made by a explosion (which results in circular craters) it looks like someone broke a wall or something, but as a crater with depth and stuff.
Is a little ankward to admit, but the calc is for a fanmade series so it will go to FC/OC, i'm asking help here because this is my first calc with pixel scaling and i wanted to try something with more liberty.
- 32,764
- 37,924
Most of the world accepts 203.2 cm as the standard height and 32 inch as the minimum starting width according to a simple google search. most sources give 1.75 inch or 4.445 cm as the minimum thickness and another site gives me 45 mm or 4.5 cm.
https://www.doorsdirect.co.za/what-are-the-standard-door-sizes-in-your-country
https://www.doorsdirect.co.za/what-are-the-standard-door-sizes-in-your-country
- 302
- 46
It sounds like a difference between exterior and interior doors.
Interior Doors are 80 in (203.2 cm) x 36" (91.44 cm) {Wheelchair accessible} x 1-3/8" (3.4925 cm).
According to this, standard width of an interior door simply for passage purposes is 32" (81.28 cm)...but public buildings will most likely have wheelchair accessible width.
Also according to this, standard exterior door (front door, etc.) is 80 in (203.2 cm) x 36 in (91.44 cm) x 1-3/4" (4.445 cm)
Interior Doors are 80 in (203.2 cm) x 36" (91.44 cm) {Wheelchair accessible} x 1-3/8" (3.4925 cm).
According to this, standard width of an interior door simply for passage purposes is 32" (81.28 cm)...but public buildings will most likely have wheelchair accessible width.
Also according to this, standard exterior door (front door, etc.) is 80 in (203.2 cm) x 36 in (91.44 cm) x 1-3/4" (4.445 cm)
- 302
- 46
Vaporizing a Human - Muscle =/= Protein. Muscle is composed of water, protein, fat and glycogen...so the Vaporizing a Human calc is calc stacking.
Avg Mass: 62 kg, Temperature: 1800 F = 982.2222222 C; Avg Body Temp 98.6 F = 37 C; Ôêåt = 945.2222222 C; Average Specific Heat of the Human Body: 3470 J/kg-C
Plug into Calculator: 203,355,108.4108 J
Avg Mass: 62 kg, Temperature: 1800 F = 982.2222222 C; Avg Body Temp 98.6 F = 37 C; Ôêåt = 945.2222222 C; Average Specific Heat of the Human Body: 3470 J/kg-C
Plug into Calculator: 203,355,108.4108 J
- 1,160
- 186
Alright, I'm confused. Were the bullet calcs legitimate, but it caused outliers, or were the bullet calcs themselves flawed?Agnaa said:
- 11,095
- 4,317
- Thread starter
- #211
How is it calc stacking? Calculating different materials in a body is definitely not calc stacking.ChemistKyle89 said:
- 32,764
- 37,924
- 14,863
- 12,354
I don't think it's calc stacking, and the current calc seems fine. The heat capacity for muscle and protein are the same.
I'm not sure if that calc you've listed is better or not, since the average specific heat of the human body would be better, but it's unclear how that website got such a value.
I'm not sure if that calc you've listed is better or not, since the average specific heat of the human body would be better, but it's unclear how that website got such a value.
- 32,764
- 37,924
Plus, DT said that you'd also have to take into account latent heat of vaporization, specific heat capacity alone is not gonna cut it.
Aaaaaaaaaand assuming you use latent heat of vaporization of water only alongside the specific heat capacity value for humans, you get 98 megajoules for water and in total 301 megajoules. It'd be close to our current values regardless.
Aaaaaaaaaand assuming you use latent heat of vaporization of water only alongside the specific heat capacity value for humans, you get 98 megajoules for water and in total 301 megajoules. It'd be close to our current values regardless.
- 11,095
- 4,317
- Thread starter
- #216
We still need latent heat for other materials if we can find values
- 11,095
- 4,317
- Thread starter
- #218
- 302
- 46
My point was, the calc uses the specific heat for muscle when calculating the protein portion. Muscle is ~75% water, ~20% protein, 1-10% fat, and 1% glycogen. [1].
I did forget latent heat of vaporization. That part won't change and we only know water...so...
203,355,108.4108 J + 84,246,840 J = 287,601,948.4108 J {vs 306,812,164.7216 J}
It wouldn't change much in the long run, but it'd make it easier to calc something like charring a human 700 C. That's a temp change of 663 C. Plug that in as Ôêåt and you get 142,637,820 J + 84,246,840 J = 226,884,466 J.
I did forget latent heat of vaporization. That part won't change and we only know water...so...
203,355,108.4108 J + 84,246,840 J = 287,601,948.4108 J {vs 306,812,164.7216 J}
It wouldn't change much in the long run, but it'd make it easier to calc something like charring a human 700 C. That's a temp change of 663 C. Plug that in as Ôêåt and you get 142,637,820 J + 84,246,840 J = 226,884,466 J.
- 14,863
- 12,354
Muscle and protein have the same specific heat.
We cannot just take the component parts of a material and add up their specific heats and proportions to get a correct answer for heating it up. That tends to give ludicrous results, depending on the material.
We cannot just take the component parts of a material and add up their specific heats and proportions to get a correct answer for heating it up. That tends to give ludicrous results, depending on the material.
- 302
- 46
There's also the fact that the 4.34 kg of blood means the total weight is 66.34 kg, not 62 kg.
62 kg Human
37.2 kg Water, 10.54 kg Fat, 9.92 kg Protein, 3.72 kg Minerals, 0.62 kg Carbohydrates, 4.34 kg Blood = 66.34 kg
62 kg Human
37.2 kg Water, 10.54 kg Fat, 9.92 kg Protein, 3.72 kg Minerals, 0.62 kg Carbohydrates, 4.34 kg Blood = 66.34 kg
- 14,863
- 12,354
I'm assuming that the water in the blood was double counted, hence the discrepancy; the current calc adds up to 107% of the weight.
The calc should probably be adjusted to use less water.
EDIT: Yeah looking at the sources for the calc it seems all over the place. 60% water comes from a lowball on wikipedia, most of the other numbers seem to come from an outdated version of this page, and blood's % comes from this website. We should ideally get all of these figures from the same source.
The calc should probably be adjusted to use less water.
EDIT: Yeah looking at the sources for the calc it seems all over the place. 60% water comes from a lowball on wikipedia, most of the other numbers seem to come from an outdated version of this page, and blood's % comes from this website. We should ideally get all of these figures from the same source.
- 32,764
- 37,924
Ok so taking into account that blood is already part of water (As in, just remove step 6 altogether), we come back to 291,979,398 joules.
I originally thought blood to be a separate entity as water considering it has plasma but what the heck.
Or, we could take the easy way out and involve the normal heat capacity and the latent heat of water version and use that for total vaporization. The lower temperature could be used for a second calc where the body isn't vaporized but merely reduced to dry bone fragments.
I originally thought blood to be a separate entity as water considering it has plasma but what the heck.
Or, we could take the easy way out and involve the normal heat capacity and the latent heat of water version and use that for total vaporization. The lower temperature could be used for a second calc where the body isn't vaporized but merely reduced to dry bone fragments.
- 11,095
- 4,317
- Thread starter
- #228
I guess either adjust using less water or less blood. Preferably the latter imo since the first one more accurate due to latent heat.
- 302
- 46
If you're fixing numbers, the average body temp is 98.6 F or 37 C...it's listed as 97.7 F (36.5 C) or 37.5 C (99.5 F).
- 13,762
- 14,046
According to this site, the ratio of steel to concrete is 100kg:130kg
Could the apportioned vaporisation values of iron and concrete be applied to the vaporisation values of reinforced concrete?
Could the apportioned vaporisation values of iron and concrete be applied to the vaporisation values of reinforced concrete?
- 1,404
- 538
Im just gonna request that can someone calc surviving the Big Bang.
- 13,762
- 14,046
Copy and paste data from here and notify once done, thanks.
EDIT: Just to ask: I find someone edited it. But the yields are different from my draft. Please confirm which ends to use.
EDIT2: Corrections applied. Admins may lock them back.
EDIT: Just to ask: I find someone edited it. But the yields are different from my draft. Please confirm which ends to use.
Just... have you provided your working for everyone else to check?KLOL506 said:
EDIT2: Corrections applied. Admins may lock them back.
This has been calculated in this profile page.MistaClean said:
- Status
