TWILIGHT-OP
He/Him- 2,428
- 1,189
I have observed a recurring issue within our community involving the creation of profiles featuring controversial haxes. To address this concern and ensure a more rigorous and standardized approach, I propose a modification to the existing rules governing profile creation.
Presently, the guidelines stipulate that a content revision thread (CRT) is mandatory only for Tier 1 profiles. However, I have identified instances, exemplified by recent profiles, where controversial haxes have been introduced without undergoing the CRT process.
The proposed modification advocates extending the CRT requirement to any profile introducing controversial haxes, not solely limited to Tier 1 profiles. This adjustment aims to maintain consistency and transparency in the evaluation of such abilities, ensuring they undergo scrutiny before being incorporated into the main profiles.
Minor revisions, typically involving simple abilities, are exempt from CRT unless they pertain to certain categories such as acausality (except type 1), concept manipulation, abstract existence, plot manipulation, information manipulation, causality manipulation, nonexistent physiology, or law manipulation. I suggest applying this exemption criterion to controversial haxes, particularly when incorporated into new profiles.
In essence, if a creator intends to incorporate controversial haxes into a new profile, they should be required to initiate a CRT for those abilities. This additional step will serve as a safeguard against potential misuse and uphold the integrity of our content creation process.
By implementing this rule modification, we can foster a more robust and accountable environment, reducing the likelihood of contentious abilities being introduced without due diligence. I believe this adjustment aligns with our shared commitment to maintaining the quality and credibility of the VS Battles Wiki.
Thank you for considering this proposal. I look forward to any feedback or discussions regarding this matter
Presently, the guidelines stipulate that a content revision thread (CRT) is mandatory only for Tier 1 profiles. However, I have identified instances, exemplified by recent profiles, where controversial haxes have been introduced without undergoing the CRT process.
The proposed modification advocates extending the CRT requirement to any profile introducing controversial haxes, not solely limited to Tier 1 profiles. This adjustment aims to maintain consistency and transparency in the evaluation of such abilities, ensuring they undergo scrutiny before being incorporated into the main profiles.
Minor revisions, typically involving simple abilities, are exempt from CRT unless they pertain to certain categories such as acausality (except type 1), concept manipulation, abstract existence, plot manipulation, information manipulation, causality manipulation, nonexistent physiology, or law manipulation. I suggest applying this exemption criterion to controversial haxes, particularly when incorporated into new profiles.
In essence, if a creator intends to incorporate controversial haxes into a new profile, they should be required to initiate a CRT for those abilities. This additional step will serve as a safeguard against potential misuse and uphold the integrity of our content creation process.
By implementing this rule modification, we can foster a more robust and accountable environment, reducing the likelihood of contentious abilities being introduced without due diligence. I believe this adjustment aligns with our shared commitment to maintaining the quality and credibility of the VS Battles Wiki.
Thank you for considering this proposal. I look forward to any feedback or discussions regarding this matter