• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Some of the abilities and ratings of this profile aren´t explained or doesn´t have scans, should it be deleted?
@CielTempest2
 
This profile isn't old but rather just 15days old, and none of P&A has scans or references in it. I do think this can be fixed if author of that profile added them that would be good, cuz there are some haxes like (immortality, life manip & Acausality type 2&4) in it without scans.
 
This is a weird case, but this thread got me thinking about it

We have profiles for Brittnay Matthews and Deandra from The Most Popular Girls In School. This is a hugely popular webseries (well, at least it was a decade ago), with the first episode having over 11 million views. It also has it's own wikipedia page.

However, all of the characters, including the two on-site, all use Barbie dolls (or similar brands) (appearance section) to represent themselves. Usually the dolls are edited, such as having their hair styled or Deandra having a robot arm replacing the doll's typical arm, but at the end of the day they're still Barbie dolls.

Would this fall under fanwork? Using stop-motion Barbie dolls for your characters? Isn't that akin to using the likeness of copyrighted characters? I'm unsure if this would be allowed or not
 
This is a weird case, but this thread got me thinking about it

We have profiles for Brittnay Matthews and Deandra from The Most Popular Girls In School. This is a hugely popular webseries (well, at least it was a decade ago), with the first episode having over 11 million views. It also has it's own wikipedia page.

However, all of the characters, including the two on-site, all use Barbie dolls (or similar brands) (appearance section) to represent themselves. Usually the dolls are edited, such as having their hair styled or Deandra having a robot arm replacing the doll's typical arm, but at the end of the day they're still Barbie dolls.

Would this fall under fanwork? Using stop-motion Barbie dolls for your characters? Isn't that akin to using the likeness of copyrighted characters? I'm unsure if this would be allowed or not
Doesn't look very much fanwork
 
This is a weird case, but this thread got me thinking about it

We have profiles for Brittnay Matthews and Deandra from The Most Popular Girls In School. This is a hugely popular webseries (well, at least it was a decade ago), with the first episode having over 11 million views. It also has it's own wikipedia page.

However, all of the characters, including the two on-site, all use Barbie dolls (or similar brands) (appearance section) to represent themselves. Usually the dolls are edited, such as having their hair styled or Deandra having a robot arm replacing the doll's typical arm, but at the end of the day they're still Barbie dolls.

Would this fall under fanwork? Using stop-motion Barbie dolls for your characters? Isn't that akin to using the likeness of copyrighted characters? I'm unsure if this would be allowed or not
@Mr. Bambu @DarkGrath @Agnaa @DontTalkDT

What do you think?
 

According to @Ben_CleverName, the creator is no longer canon to Wizard101, with the creators saying this about him:

The Creator text was a very very old set of quests that were written extremely early on, before the story had really taken shape. We'd veered away from a lot of those ideas, so rather than leave something we'd never clarify we opted to put down some hints at bigger things to come so new players would be forewarned about some of the major story stuff to come.
 

According to @Ben_CleverName, the creator is no longer canon to Wizard101, with the creators saying this about him:

The Creator text was a very very old set of quests that were written extremely early on, before the story had really taken shape. We'd veered away from a lot of those ideas, so rather than leave something we'd never clarify we opted to put down some hints at bigger things to come so new players would be forewarned about some of the major story stuff to come.
I agree
 

According to @Ben_CleverName, the creator is no longer canon to Wizard101, with the creators saying this about him:

The Creator text was a very very old set of quests that were written extremely early on, before the story had really taken shape. We'd veered away from a lot of those ideas, so rather than leave something we'd never clarify we opted to put down some hints at bigger things to come so new players would be forewarned about some of the major story stuff to come.
Is there a source to the quote?
 
Is there a source to the quote?
You can CTRL + F "creator" on this page and eventually find it, but here's a screenshot.

image.png
 
 
This profile is already on FC/OC
Bumping this, there's more reasons on why this shouldn't stay. Putting aside the unreliable ratings (such as peak human ls for climbing ladders fast?), it's a composite, borrowing abilities from it's classic counterpart which are not showcased in the current version. The name of the profile also doesn't even say from which game it's from, only "Roblox" probably wouldn't be enough, it's a platform of games.
 
Last edited:
Dereck03 handled it. 🙏
 
Bumping this, there's more reasons on why this shouldn't stay. Putting aside the unreliable ratings (such as peak human ls for climbing ladders fast?), it's a composite, borrowing abilities from it's classic counterpart which are not showcased in the current version. The name of the profile also doesn't even say from which game it's from, only "Roblox" wouldn't be enough, it's a platform of games.
I suppose that they can likely be deleted then, but it depends on what other staff members here think as well. 🙏
 
Should be self-explanatory.
 
Should be self-explanatory.
I handled it. 🙏
 

Blog on the main wiki
Vzearr handled it. 🙏
 
Bumping this, there's more reasons on why this shouldn't stay. Putting aside the unreliable ratings (such as peak human ls for climbing ladders fast?), it's a composite, borrowing abilities from it's classic counterpart which are not showcased in the current version. The name of the profile also doesn't even say from which game it's from, only "Roblox" wouldn't be enough, it's a platform of games.
I'm still waiting for it's deletion despite the rake being a public domain character (which doesn't matter due to the fact that RE Marchant is in the game)
 
I'm still waiting for it's deletion despite the rake being a public domain character (which doesn't matter due to the fact that RE Marchant is in the game)
They do look somewhat alike in some way, but it probably wouldn't be evidence by itself since the ingame merchant doesn't have voicelines in the remastered version (unlike the classic one)
 
Last edited:
I do think this should be moved to its creator's sandbox, it's incomplete with no character profiles for verse yet.

Edit:
This one too should be transfer to its owners sandbox, formatting errors and some ratings aren't valid.
 
Last edited:

Should be moved to sandbox of it's creator.
 

Should be moved to sandbox of it's creator.
Done.
 
Back
Top