- 32,835
- 38,105
Nah, you need to be superior to them altogether as well.Is being unbounded by the bounds of time as well as beyond the perception of space-time is enough to get BDE Type 2?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah, you need to be superior to them altogether as well.Is being unbounded by the bounds of time as well as beyond the perception of space-time is enough to get BDE Type 2?
Resurrection via causality manipulationIs resurrect people by undo event of cause of his death it's still count as Resurrection?
Limited blood manipulation.What ability is it for things which can stop bleeding of a wound, and do surgery essentially?
Please be more specific.What would boomeranging weapons classify as? just tech?
Guy can launch blades, those blades can come back and hit the original target preciselyPlease be more specific.
If this is something like "I throw my sword and it comes back" without further context, then it would just be Weapon Mastery iirc
Thats just possession.Is there a being possessed his vessel, and he can speak with his vessel through his vessel body. It's still count as Telepathy?
Can you describe the feat? The panels sent don't give me too many clues.
Gowther seems to throw off the direction of the attackCan you describe the feat? The panels sent don't give me too many clues.
Vector Manipulation? Maybe limited attack reflection or modification.Gowther seems to throw off the direction of the attack
First one seems like biological manipulation+Explosion manipulation.Two characters with essentially the same ability but different methods.
One character has a "gem" that grants them healing powers, however, they can use that same energy and pour it into the opponent. The results of this are the opponent's skin bubbling up grotesquely before exploding.
Second character condenses fire inside of an opponent, and then detonates it to cause a large explosion.
Both seem to be explosion manipulation to some extent, but are both durability negation?
Matter Manipulation and DeconstructionSo I'm preparing a profile for Iron man AA, so at one point Tony says that his Uni-Beam can atomize its target, should I say it's deconstruction or just AP in the profile?
Well, I don't know about biological manip. It is the healing type character, so I guess if it were to be anyone that makes sense. I'll send a the few instances of this happened:First one seems like biological manipulation+Explosion manipulation.
First one is dura neg for sure. But I think biological manipulation already covers it. I'm not sure though. If it doesn't cover the dura neg part. Then it's applicable.Well, I don't know about biological manip. It is the healing type character, so I guess if it were to be anyone that makes sense. I'll send a the few instances of this happened:
Second instance:
Third instance:
I think biological manip is feasible given the healing "gems" can allow the user to regenerate which I figure would count as a biological ability by default in most cases. And it allowed the user to imbue energy into an opponents arm to induce paralysis:
So I can see it being the case, but I'm not 100% certain...
And if it is biological manip+explosion manip, it'd be considered dura-neg, right?
And what of the second example?
The second one as in the one where he condenses flame into a target and then explodes them from the inside? Or second as in the second set of pictures?First one is dura neg for sure. But I think biological manipulation already covers it. I'm not sure though. If it doesn't cover the dura neg part. Then it's applicable.
Second one seems like energy Explosion manipulation.
Bump. Wanted multiple opinions on this.Two characters with essentially the same ability but different methods.
One character has a "gem" that grants them healing powers, however, they can use that same energy and pour it into the opponent. The results of this are the opponent's skin bubbling up grotesquely before exploding.
Second character condenses fire inside of an opponent, and then detonates it to cause a large explosion.
Both seem to be explosion manipulation to some extent, but are both durability negation?
It can be work like dura neg but there was another ability which suits this better than dura neg if I'm correct. Let me checkThe second one as in the one where he condenses flame into a target and then explodes them from the inside? Or second as in the second set of pictures?
If you mean the latter, all of those are the same technique.
If you mean the former, here's pics of the fire based explosions
Dunno if internal attacks like an explosion of flames would count as dura neg or not. Cuz I know some character's get dura neg via attacking internally.
This would be memory erasure and "the things that he did were erased" sounds odd, that could be causality manip but idkSo, lets see...
Character A erased charcter B and everything relate with him, everyone forget him, the things that he did were erased, his parents don't remember him, even his contact in the cellphone was deleted, he wasn't just erased, he was erased to the point where he never existed.
So, is just a really good EE or is any other skill, besides EE?
Did you ever find anything?It can be work like dura neg but there was another ability which suits this better than dura neg if I'm correct. Let me check
Sorry forgot about this.Did you ever find anything?
So far I don't think wiki has any ability for thiswhat ability would be regenerating one's memories?
Regeneration (no type)what ability would be regenerating one's memories?
Sounds like it, yeah.I made a thread about this before, but I want to make absolutely sure before I try something big.
Let's say someone exists as an idea, and they are completely erased from everywhere, whether it be physically, temporal, and the minds of everyone; but then they come back. Would that be High-Godly?
A restricted form of Time travel and Mind manipulation, I would say.What type of ability is placing someone's mind into someone else's body who is in the future while the former was still in the present?