Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It seems you didnt convince that many people with your debunking.Xerkser500 said:Im still in agreement with Acasuality, since all the reasons for why they shouldnt have it I already debunked or countered.
Causality being unsure about Acausality sounds paradoxical.FateAlbane said:Is it just me or The Causality is being counted as unsure about Acausality twice?
I honestly don't know as it never the topic as it was already there prior to the other thread CRT. If I am being honest, I would remove it as it is self-contractionary. This topic is probably another topic for another CRT.DMB 1 said:So, about Giratina's type 8 Immortality, does it remain or not?
Even if it does remain, the profile should still be edited, because it contradicts itself.
He was affected by a temporal paradox in Pokemon Mystery dungeon like Kep stated. The required for Acausality Type 1, the most basic, is to be unaffected by temporal paradox.TriforcePower1 said:Given that Cal gave up, I'll try an argument.
Dialga is omnipresent across time, right? That was commonly agreed, I think. As such, the only way to kill Dialga is to attack him across all of time, as otherwise you simply wouldn't be able to affect Dialga in his entirety. Which means that in order to kill Dialga, you have to affect past, present and future, which I believe is some sort of Acausality. Him getting affected in Mystery Dungeon was just because the thing affected all time.
Wait, why the hell are people trying to apply that to the regular form? That makes no frigging sense. I saw DMUA's argument and not even half of it was un-implied.Xerkser500 said:Why are people still bringing up Dialga being destroyed by a time paradox before Arceus intervened in Mystery Dungeon? I literally debunked that entirely.
It was Primal Dialga who was going to be destroyed with the timeline, not Normal Dialga. And the former is a corrupted, unstable form of Dialga who's time manipulating is complete and utter crap compared to the Normal Dialga.
The literal best this argument proves is that Primal Dialga is bound by time, which given the entire existence of the form, is perfectly reasonable.
You can't apply a weakness from a weakened form of Dialga to a non-weakened one. Thats nonsense.
TriforcePower1 said:Can I get more context? Because it could just be that the tower messed up with time in general and not just the past.
This CRT is basically over. I just need to make the additions; I have being busy with other CRTs. The Acausilty agreement is a no for CT and LC based on the votes. If you guys going want to discuss further on this. It is better to make a new CRTs we are way over 300 replies, nearly at 400. Honestly, I think a CRT regarding Acausilty for the CT and LT most likely will be rejectedDragopentling said: