- 1,590
- 308
When was Solar Beam stated to be lightspeed?This is what they both are
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When was Solar Beam stated to be lightspeed?This is what they both are
The fact that is a charged beam made of sunlight which moves straight like a laser beam isn't enough? You're telling me this?When was Solar Beam stated to be lightspeed?
I'm talking about the bold bullet point stating that the projectile must be referred to as light speed by a reliable source.The fact that is a charged beam made of sunlight which moves straight like a laser beam isn't enough?
We were talking about Signal Beam thoI'm talking about the bold bullet point stating that the projectile must be referred to as light speed by a reliable source.
It looks like both.We were talking about Signal Beam tho
YesIt looks like both.
Anyways, Signal Beam was called Lightspeed?
Skimmed over, and don’t see where the beam is stated to be anything other than a beam of light, which is a different criteria for qualify as of the list.
A beam of light is lightspeed from default tho.Skimmed over, and don’t see where the beam is stated to be anything other than a beam of light, which is a different criteria for qualify as of the list.
A beam of light being implicitly light speed is one thing, it being stated to be light speed is another. You can make the case that the beam moves at the speed of light due it being light, but you can't say that the beam it's stated to move at light speeds because it's stated to be light. That's why being made of light and being stated to move at the speed of light are two different criteria.A beam of light is lightspeed from default tho.
A beam of light being implicitly light speed is one thing, it being stated to be light speed is another. You can make the case that the beam moves at the speed of light due it being light, but you can't say that the beam it's stated to move at light speeds because it's stated to be light. That's why being made of light and being stated to move at the speed of light are two different criteria.
I mean, these are enough.Here is the damn question.
What is the general proof that Solar beam and Signal beam actually fit the criteria for SoL?
-beam is made of light
-beam travels in a straight line
-beam reflects from shiny surfaces.
-beam is called lightspeed by reliable source
-comes from a realistic source of light
the beam was never called lightspeed, just light.I mean, these are enough.
Read the fourth.I mean, these are enough.
Yout get my point tho, since is a literal beam of light that goes straight and hasn't any contradictions of it being SoL basing on these.the beam was never called lightspeed, just light.
that isn't how it works. Light that moves in a straight line but has no evidence of being made of light and isn't coming out of something that can create light then it is not provable until further evidence.Yout get my point tho, since is a literal beam of light that goes straight and hasn't any contradictions of it being SoL basing on these.
Gen 4 and 5 animation (and you can argue gen 6/7 as well) do and in anime it always goes straight.Read the fourth.
And I mean, I'm fine with point one and two for Solar Beam (Won’t talk about point two for Signal Beam because I don’t really recall it going on a straight path, but that might just be my memory failing) to get SoL treatment, but the move it's not stated to be light speed. At least not as far as I’m aware.
It's literally stated in the games lmao.Light that moves in a straight line but has no evidence of being made of light
sorry i misworded that. You cannot prove it is a legitimate beam that moves at SoL speed basically. Ask a mod, they'll explain better, i need to go to sleepGen 4 and 5 animation (and you can argue gen 6/7 as well) do and in anime it always goes straight.
It's literally stated in the games lmao.
It fits 2 of the criterias and has no contradictions. You don't need to be so nitpicking.sorry i misworded that. You cannot prove it is a legitimate beam that moves at SoL speed basically. Ask a mod, they'll explain better, i need to go to sleep
look man, ask mods. I don't care.It fits 2 of the criterias and has no contradictions. You don't need to be so nitpicking.
Now you're trolling. Tell me you do, please.look man, ask mods. I don't care.
what i care more about is whether or not there is a site where i can read the pokemon pocket monsters manga (the one with the clefairy) as one of the chapters has clefairy reflecting a solar beam using reflect.
Ask the mods man. I ain't no expert. I could be in the wrong here but light has been considered not the speed of light countless timesNow you're trolling. Tell me you do, please.
Except that first Reflect is for whatever attack like Flamethrower.Ask the mods man. I ain't no expert. I could be in the wrong here but light has been considered not the speed of light countless times
It goes as a straight like in some animations. Can I see a proof of the latter too?Something else too. Couldn’t Psybeam also possibly count as a light beam?
The anime has shown the attack can reflect off of glass, just as light can.
I've already debunked these reasons. If you want to go in the nitpicking way then do it, just don't complain if you get countered again.i am against signal beam.
You didn't debunk it. You said "bruh you got to be joking". Your whole debunk stands on the idea that two criterias are enough.I've already debunked these reasons. If you want to go in the nitpicking way then do it, just don't complain if you get countered again.
I’ll try and find it but I vaguely remember it being mentioned here.It goes as a straight like in some animations. Can I see a proof of the latter too?
Well, sadly I didn't found any notable feat with Flash Cannon, so we have to stick with these two regardless.I’ll try and find it but I vaguely remember it being mentioned here.
Being called a beam of light is tho.Moving straight is not evidence for light speed lol. That’s quite literally on the page.
This one depends on the mod funny enough. Some will say that is enough for the 4th requirement others will say it has to say photons specifically.Being called a beam of light is tho.
It is stated to be composed/consisting of photons or light itself, again by a reliable source.
The user attacks with a sinister beam of light. This may also confuse the target.It is from light from a bug move that can confuse opponents
So you contradict this wiki's very page on the Lightspeed standards.It is from light from a bug move that can confuse opponents
It seems like it just meets the four requirements at best.
From my knowledge, at least two requirements are needed to be met.
So, I retracted my point on it being valid light unless there are more contexts.
Yeah no. The requirements say photons OR light itself.This one depends on the mod funny enough. Some will say that is enough for the 4th requirement others will say it has to say photons specifically.
The beam refracts in a new material, such as a liquid or...
The beam diffuses in a reasonably realistic way or reflects off a material that it can be expected to, such as a non-magical mirror.
The beam is called lightspeed by reliable sources.
It is stated to be composed/consisting of photons or light itself, again by a reliable source.
It has its origin at a realistic source of light, such as a camera.