- 11,512
- 8,284
I mean affecting the final sayPretty sure you’re a knowledgeable enough member
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean affecting the final sayPretty sure you’re a knowledgeable enough member
OhI mean affecting the final say
Just wanted to say that they having 6-A feats is irrelevant to the ratings in question, as anyone can calculate any of Tornado's or Psykos' feats and get results lower than High 6-A.@Recon1511
The "At least 6-A" part comes from the pair of them demonstrably having 6-A feats/calcs.
No. No no no, we’re not doing this@Therefir; that's a fair perspective to have.
But personally I'd consider a 6-A feat slightly more important than a High 6-A bit of scaling. It would depend on context as always, and consistency is a factor too, but I personally wouldn't default to the latter being the most important rating. (Likewise if we had a case of a High 6-A feat and a 6-A bit of powerscaling; I wouldn't default to the bit of powerscaling automatically outweighting the feat just because it's lower).
If the character in question is close to High 6-A via feats, then a label of "At least 6-A" sounds right to me. If there is a bit of scaling that implies a High 6-A rating but does not confirm it then a "likely High 6-A" rating sounds fine to me.
Putting them together to get "At least 6-A, likely High 6-A" sounds like the most reasonable outcome to me to incorporate all the evidence.
I get if you have a different perspective on it, and that's fine, but that's the explanation for why I see it the way I see it.
It’s coming off as that it can’t be a full rating because his 6-A is more consistent therefore it must be a likely rating@ZillertheBucko I'm not saying a "lesser feat is an antifeat". That's not my position.
If you think my argument is along the lines of "then every time someone throws a punch without creating a shockwave that destroys everything in the damn town would be an anti feat." Then I think you've misunderstood me.
It actually has been done before. Twice.So it's finally here, no idea why this wasn't done sooner but whatever
Sure, I don’t really care either way though.@Qawsedf234 @LordTracer What do you think? It's a plain "High 6-A" fine for these monsters?
It’s more so a case of the author putting it in there because they trust the readers’ intelligence enough to know they don’t have to say “wow Sage centipede is even stronger than Orochi” when they show the remnants of Orochi in front of god’s mural after he was one shot by saitama starting to glow with the power of God and then summon a monster the size of a continent who says he’s going to kill the guy who turned against godI don't dispute that, though I think a couple of those points are kinda silly (being made from X corpse does not give evidence to being comparable to X
3-4 people have basically accepted full ratings thoughWell, I don't see reason to keep arguing for hours since the CRT is basically accepted, a full rating would have made the wording on the profiles less complicated but oh well...
Only LordTracer has. Remember only Thread Moderators, Admins and Bureacrats can accept CRTs.3-4 people have basically accepted full ratings though
Phoenks is a thread moderatorOnly LordTracer has. Remember only Thread Moderators, Admins and Bureacrats can accept CRTs.
So it's 2-2 in staff votes + the non-staff members agreeing with the full ratingSo far we've got LordTracer is favor of a full High 6-A rating.
Maverick and myself in favor of "At least 6-A, likely High 6-A".
And Mr. Bambu who is fine with either.
If you want to add it in, you can, or you can wait for more staff.
Phoenks is a Content Moderator for FC/OCPhoenks is a thread moderator
But only for oc wikiPhoenks is a thread moderator
Phoenks is a Content Moderator for FC/OC
Listen, I see yellow and correlate the two positions without thinkingBut only for oc wiki
What type of evidence would be helpful?unless there's any additional evidence I've overlooked
I'd technically consider it more 2-3 in staff votes technically (considering Mr. Bambu is fine with either proposition).So it's 2-2 in staff votes + the non-staff members agreeing with the full rating
If I were to add this, do we settle for a full rating or just "likely" ?
I can wait for more staff but I think there are like 6 here already and I don't want to bother more people than necessary
So like, because Saitama treated Orochi like a joke, yet thought Garou was Monster King because of killing Sage, means that Saitama thinks Sage would be more powerful, yeah?Saitama thought Garou was the monster king after seeing him killing Sage. If that can be added justification.
That's a good pointSaitama thought Garou was the monster king after seeing him killing Sage. If that can be added justification.
No, after defeating Orochi he was Searching for the monster king and though Garou was the monster king because of his Strength(Viz).So like, because Saitama treated Orochi like a joke, yet thought Garou was Monster King because of killing Sage, means that Saitama thinks Sage would be more powerful, yeah?
It's overall weird to me. My opinions are as follows:I'd technically consider it more 2-3 in staff votes technically (considering Mr. Bambu is fine with either proposition).
I'll tag @Qawsedf234 to comment, if you'd like a more decisive vote.
Qaws, can you go through the thread and the proposals please?
Disappointing but anywaysIt's overall weird to me. My opinions are as follows:
There's also the issue with God giving people powers since he varies from 7-B to 4-A in terms of given energy. The latter is the bigger part since if God knew about Saitama and knew about Blast then why would he send a Tier 6 anyways? They never in any capacity stood a chance against someone remotely on Blast's level.
- The scaling to Tornado doesn't work to me because by the time Sage and ENO came she was heavily injured and wouldn't stand much of a chance against them
- Being made of Orochi isn't the same as being as strong as Orochi
I do think scaling to Orochi can work since SG was strong enough to put Garou > Orochi in Saitama's mind but a solid rating relies basically only on that since the rest are statements from a character with no known validity and confidence scaling which is rarely solid on its own.
So I'm fine with "Likely at least High 6-A" or something.