Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, they didnt consider the feat as outlier when it was Low 5-Bi know it could be an outlier but i want to understand if the calculations are correct
It could be, but there's also the fact that it needs to be reviewed whether or not it's an outlier, in order to be accepted into the scaling.i know it could be an outlier but i want to understand if the calculations are correct
It can't be accepted into the scaling either way. That much energy would literally blow up the planet. Since OPM Earth hasn't been displayed as more durable than IRL Earth, this doesn't work.It could be, but there's also the fact that it needs to be reviewed whether or not it's an outlier, in order to be accepted into the scaling.
Well, it is a proof that it is more durable even then, we have 5-A feats due moon fuckery (literally moving the moon)It can't be accepted into the scaling either way. That much energy would literally blow up the planet. Since OPM Earth hasn't been displayed as more durable than IRL Earth, this doesn't work.
Opinions can change over time ya knowWell, they didnt consider the feat as outlier when it was Low 5-B
We would need more proof than that.Well, it is a proof that it is more durable
Its low = yeah acceptableOpinions can change over time ya know
Don't moon moving feats involve KE bullshit?Well, it is a proof that it is more durable even then, we have 5-A feats due moon fuckery (literally moving the moon)
Unless they can prove their reasoning wrong, or have better reasoning for not using it, then why would we change?Opinions can change over time ya know
If the calc is acceptedUnless they can prove their reasoning wrong, or have better reasoning for not using it, then why would we change?
Fancy urself a heretic, then?I prefer the High 5-A calc
Actually moving planets and exceeding their GBE isn't that wild. Planet's have a large surface area to get rid of drag and things like that. You have IRL planets and stars thrown at near-lightspeeds and holding together because of that.we have 5-A feats due moon fuckery (literally moving the moon)
ySomething physically connecting with the Earth with that much energy is a different story.
Because the Earth wouldn't be able to spread that force around itself. It would have to take the brunt of it, which would cause damages far beyond what was shown in the story.
It is the same case with planets feats exceding their own GBE, despite it not being that weirdBecause the Earth wouldn't be able to spread that force around itself. It would have to take the brunt of it, which would cause damages far beyond what was shown in the story.
Actually moving planets and exceeding their GBE isn't that wild. Planet's have a large surface area to get rid of drag and things like that. You have IRL planets and stars thrown at near-lightspeeds and holding together because of that.
Something physically connecting with the Earth with that much energy is a different story.
Because the Earth wouldn't be able to spread that force around itself. It would have to take the brunt of it, which would cause damages far beyond what was shown in the story.
^^ All this.Yeah, it doesn't make sense for this to be superior to the planet's GBE.
I just explained why that isn't weird. You have legitimate in real life evidence of a planet's KE vastly outstripping its GBE, but due to surface area and how it deals with friction it can retain its form. The Earth's KE is higher than its GBE for example.It is the same case with planets feats exceding their own GBE
I know, i said it in that commentI just explained why that isn't weird. You have legitimate in real life evidence of a planet's KE vastly outstripping its GBE,
I mean, if the 5-B rating is not usable due it, why wasnt low 5-B rejected due the same thing? As it didnt destroyed "half of the earth hence invalid"but due to surface area and how it deals with friction it can retain its form. The Earth's KE is higher than its GBE for example.
I mean, if the 5-B rating is not usable due it, why wasnt low 5-B rejected due the same thing? As it didnt destroyed "half of the earth hence invalid"
I mean, in the time to accept it, yall had the chance to reject, the reasoning is the sameSome of us wanted to get rid of Low 5-B before this thread so-
Low 5-B doesn't explode the planet like 5-B does.why wasnt low 5-B rejected due the same thing?
But we also don't. The plate lift is a different version, since the original one didn't match the environmental destruction that happened right after so we had to go with PEaccept dropping literal oceans out of the sky
It would explode most of it, but it didntLow 5-B doesn't explode the planet like 5-B does.
I agree with the High 6-A calc.Anyways we're off topic again
And then we nuke the feat entirely UwUHopefully true's calc gets accepted
Sad but trueAnd then we nuke the feat entirely UwU
There's only one Outlier Bomb and its not an OutlierOutlier Bomb
5155 / 516.2 = 9.98643936459 m/px
- Distance = 5155 km = 516.2 px
Sizing:
- Diameter = 47.5 px = 474.35 km (radius 237.175 km)
- Height = 54.6 px = 545.25 km
Considering 10 seconds (hahahahah)= 23717.5 m/s
- Volume = 3.2119007e+16 m³
- Density = 4500 kg/m³
- Mass = 1.4453553e+20 kg
- KE = (0.5) * (1.4453553e+20) * (23717.5²) = 4.0652049e+28 J or 9.7 Exatons (Multi-Continent level)
The bottom portion of the lower mantel is about that densitythe earth?
That's the density of the Earth's Inner Core.from what I have found it should be 12600 kg / m ^ 3