- 59
- 71
agree
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One Punch Man - Low 5-B downgrades
- Thread starter Qawsedf234
- Start date
- Status
- 15,589
- 11,879
I'm neutral then
However a Low 5-B attack passing through the entire planet and only causing earthquakes instead of like, tearing apart half the crust is suspicious, and KE feats are ignored if the results shown contradict the AP.
- 14,677
- 20,393
I disagree with the downgrade atm
- 15,279
- 15,444
- 59
- 71
deformation of the outer core would give similar results
I do not understand why it should be excused when following that logic practically all the weapons of class s heroes should disintegrate every time they are used for the astronomical quantities of energy to which they are subjected
then the palace built by metal knight was built with super resistant materials and these materials logically should have been obtained from the earth
I do not understand why it should be excused when following that logic practically all the weapons of class s heroes should disintegrate every time they are used for the astronomical quantities of energy to which they are subjected
then the palace built by metal knight was built with super resistant materials and these materials logically should have been obtained from the earth
- 15,589
- 11,879
Are you arguing the entirety of OPM earth is more durable than normal Earth? That's dumb and would require much more proof.
- 59
- 71
I'm just saying it's a possibility
- 2,926
- 1,399
- Distance = 5155 km = 516.2 px
- Diameter = 47.5 px = 474.35 km (radius 237.175 km)
- Height = 54.6 px = 545.25 km
- Volume = 3.2119007e+16 m³
- Density = 4500 kg/m³
- Mass = 1.4453553e+20 kg
- KE = (0.5) * (1.4453553e+20) * (23717.5²) = 4.0652049e+28 J or 9.7 Exatons (Multi-Continent level)
- 10,272
- 2,754
I do agree the orb appears to have mass.
- 2,537
- 2,124
Put that in a blog.
5155 / 516.2 = 9.98643936459 m/px
- Distance = 5155 km = 516.2 px
Sizing:
- Diameter = 47.5 px = 474.35 km (radius 237.175 km)
- Height = 54.6 px = 545.25 km
Considering 10 seconds (hahahahah)= 23717.5 m/s
- Volume = 3.2119007e+16 m³
- Density = 4500 kg/m³
- Mass = 1.4453553e+20 kg
- KE = (0.5) * (1.4453553e+20) * (23717.5²) = 4.0652049e+28 J or 9.7 Exatons (Multi-Continent level)
- 15,589
- 11,879
one that cannot be proven and should not be the default assumption
- 2,926
- 1,399
Orochi takes a little bit of Earth energy
vsbattles.fandom.com
I updated my blog, although I think 10 seconds is too high.
- 59
- 71
did not consider the lower parts that were moved
5155 / 516.2 = 9.98643936459 m/px
- Distance = 5155 km = 516.2 px
Sizing:
- Diameter = 47.5 px = 474.35 km (radius 237.175 km)
- Height = 54.6 px = 545.25 km
Considering 10 seconds (hahahahah)= 23717.5 m/s
- Volume = 3.2119007e+16 m³
- Density = 4500 kg/m³
- Mass = 1.4453553e+20 kg
- KE = (0.5) * (1.4453553e+20) * (23717.5²) = 4.0652049e+28 J or 9.7 Exatons (Multi-Continent level)
- 2,926
- 1,399
Yes, it would be a lot of unnecessary work and it wouldn't change the result much.
- 19,597
- 15,955
- Thread starter
- #216
10 seconds isn't that high. We had multiple pages and multiple reactions from even normal people about the event.
- 19,597
- 15,955
- Thread starter
- #217
Well if accepted then the changes are as follows
- All of the Class Z ratings are removed
- All of the Low 5-B ratings are changed to High 6-A
- Are we scaling Orochi to the 166 Teratons feat or the 9.7 Exaton feat. What I mean by this is are we saying Orochi's base is High 6-B or High 6-A
- 15,279
- 15,444
What was the High 6-B feat?
- 19,597
- 15,955
- Thread starter
- #219
The earthquake
- 15,279
- 15,444
Ah. I’m fine with scaling him to that.
- 8,851
- 5,686
Why high 6-A?
- 17,968
- 15,609
He has no other forms other than true form. Either way, he'll be High 6-A.
- 19,597
- 15,955
- Thread starter
- #223
- Serious Punch: High 6-A
- CSRC: High 6-A
- Plate Lift: High 6-A
- Magma Pull: High 6-A
I was asking are we making him "High 6-A, higher with the Gaia Cannon" or "High 6-B. High 6-A with the Gaia Cannon"
- 17,968
- 15,609
Usk's calc.
azontr
He/Him- 39,470
- 49,564
Because OPM is permeated with High 6-A feats.
- 2,926
- 1,399
I prefer the first
- 14,677
- 20,393
Huh, consistency
- 2,926
- 1,399
By the way, I think Boros should have the same thing, only with CSRC
- 3,566
- 877
Not only to mention that the Core itself got distorted which shouldn't happen if only the heat/energy was being pulled :
- 2,537
- 2,124
Accepted the mid-end. Though I would feel comfortable if yous got input from another CGM. Maybe @Armorchompy should check it out.
- 19,597
- 15,955
- Thread starter
- #231
If we're upscaling Boros to Orochi then yes, his second key would be like his old version that scaled to the moon jump of "High 6-A, Higher with the CSRC"
- 8,851
- 5,686
Ah I see so the new calculation takes into account the movement of the mantle due to the movement of the blob of energy right? I see well orochi would indeed scale to that since it's himself causing the kinetic energy.
- 17,968
- 15,609
- 2,926
- 1,399
Yes, I agree with that too, but...
- 14,947
- 1,823
I do think that it is clear the mantle moved tbh. So I support using the mantle movement calc.
- 19,597
- 15,955
- Thread starter
- #236
New ranking system would be
- Serious Punch's Original Power: 3.52 Exatons
- Serious Punch Left Over Power: 2.51 Exatons
- Core Pull: 2.42 Exatons
- CSRC: 1.01 Exatons
- Plate Lift: 254 Petatons
Because its more likely that he yanked out Thermal Energy than 3.5% of the Moon's total mass that he then somehow stored into his body
- 59
- 71
outer core is therefore liquid
I try to make an approximate and simplified calculation of the work required to malform the outer core:
en.wikipedia.org
1) shape drag
Sphere: 90%
cone:> 10%
(this is a downward approximation to avoid too complex calculations)
I find the viscous friction force for the moving sphere and then multiply by 0.1 since the friction of a cone is at best 90% lower
using the measurements provided by USklaverei
radius: 237 000 m (r)
distance: 545 000 m (d)
time: 20s (t)
speed: 545 000/20 m / s (v)
density = (de)
viscosity = (vs)
Re = (2r * v * de) / vs if Re <1 we can use this formula:
F (friction) = - 6pi * r * vs * v (v = d / t)
www.nature.com
viscosity outer core = 10e + 16 pa * s
density outer core = 12.6 g / m3 or 12600 kg / m ^ 3
Re = (2 * 237000 * (545000/20) * 12600) / 10e + 16 = 0.016 (Re <1)
F = - 6pi * r * vs * v (v = d / t) * 0.1 (because it is a cone)
work = F * d
but since it starts from a standstill and accelerates (the friction increases with increasing speed) I have to do the integral
integral from d1 = 0m to d2 = 545000 m (distance) of -6pi * r * vs * d / t * 0.1 in ds
using
www.integral-calculator.com
result = -
331560096750000000000000000000000 joules
I try to make an approximate and simplified calculation of the work required to malform the outer core:
Drag (physics) - Wikipedia
Sphere: 90%
cone:> 10%
(this is a downward approximation to avoid too complex calculations)
I find the viscous friction force for the moving sphere and then multiply by 0.1 since the friction of a cone is at best 90% lower
using the measurements provided by USklaverei
radius: 237 000 m (r)
distance: 545 000 m (d)
time: 20s (t)
speed: 545 000/20 m / s (v)
density = (de)
viscosity = (vs)
Re = (2r * v * de) / vs if Re <1 we can use this formula:
F (friction) = - 6pi * r * vs * v (v = d / t)
Geodynamic estimates of the viscosity of the Earth's inner core - Nature
Recent seismological studies1,2 have suggested that the inner core is rotating relative to the bulk of the Earth, a situation which (according to numerical simulations3) may be sustained by convective flow in the liquid outer core. On the other hand, large gravitational forces due to the...
www.nature.com
viscosity outer core = 10e + 16 pa * s
density outer core = 12.6 g / m3 or 12600 kg / m ^ 3
Re = (2 * 237000 * (545000/20) * 12600) / 10e + 16 = 0.016 (Re <1)
F = - 6pi * r * vs * v (v = d / t) * 0.1 (because it is a cone)
work = F * d
but since it starts from a standstill and accelerates (the friction increases with increasing speed) I have to do the integral
integral from d1 = 0m to d2 = 545000 m (distance) of -6pi * r * vs * d / t * 0.1 in ds
using
Integral Calculator • With Steps!
Solve definite and indefinite integrals (antiderivatives) using this free online calculator. Step-by-step solution and graphs included!
www.integral-calculator.com
331560096750000000000000000000000 joules
- 19,597
- 15,955
- Thread starter
- #238
That's more than the Earth's total GBE my guy
- 24,162
- 24,841
What would it yield?
- 751
- 398
How does pulling thermal energy warp the landscape of the planet? It's literally heat energy / heat radiation. It doesn't have measurable mass. We see a piece of the core get sectioned off.
- Status
Similar threads
