- 31,580
- 28,032
Good luck.Yuh u good
Going to a job interview I'll start the additions to the sandbox (then the profiles) later
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good luck.Yuh u good
Going to a job interview I'll start the additions to the sandbox (then the profiles) later
On profiles, each and every one will be revised into this format
"(Insert Proficiency) Kenbunshoku, (Insert Proficiency) Busoshoku, (Insert Proficiency) Haoshoku"
If it is missing one
"(Insert Proficiency) Kenbunshoku, (Insert Proficiency) Busoshoku"
"(Insert Proficiency) Kenbunshoku, (Insert Proficiency) Haoshoku"
"(Insert Proficiency) Busoshoku, (Insert Proficiency) Haoshoku"
Maybe just notable attacks that includes haki? like ryuo(ryou) forgot how it spelledHaki page and references are done.
Finally they're done.
Before we add those, we need to talk about if we're revising the Notable Attacks and Techniques section.
Should it even have Haki in there? Haki has been greatly explained on the wiki page. Haki doesn't have notable techniques or anything, it's just it's basic usages and such
I suggest we remove all Haki from the notable attacks and techniques sections, and the only thing on the profiles about Haki would be the category and these
that isn't a notable attack either, it's just another stage (technically Ryuo is just another name for Buso but I won't get into that here) which is already well defined on the pageMaybe just notable attacks that includes haki? like ryuo(ryou) forgot how it spelled
I can agree with this, I don’t really think it’s necessary to have haki explained in notable attacksShould it even have Haki in there? Haki has been greatly explained on the wiki page. Haki doesn't have notable techniques or anything, it's just it's basic usages and such
I suggest we remove all Haki from the notable attacks and techniques sections, and the only thing on the profiles about Haki would be the category and these
My bad watching it again after a long time but well if you say so it's fine i guessthat isn't a notable attack either, it's just another stage (technically Ryuo is just another name for Buso but I won't get into that here) which is already well defined on the page
I agree considering most are either empty or are just copy and pasted from the haki page itself. Although realising this it's probably best to add a Goken description to the haki page instead since it's only described on the haki Notable attacks/techniques section.I suggest we remove all Haki from the notable attacks and techniques sections, and the only thing on the profiles about Haki would be the category and these
Yeah it makes sense to remove Haki from the notable techniques part.Haki page and references are done.
Finally they're done.
Before we add those, we need to talk about if we're revising the Notable Attacks and Techniques section.
Should it even have Haki in there? Haki has been greatly explained on the wiki page. Haki doesn't have notable techniques or anything, it's just it's basic usages and such
I suggest we remove all Haki from the notable attacks and techniques sections, and the only thing on the profiles about Haki would be the category and these
Also this can be added nowBefore we add those
This seems to make sense to me.I don't think that Haki should be removed from the Notable Attacks sections. We don't need full descriptions on exactly what each type is, but we could at least list character's individual Haki feats there.
With references preferably.
For most characters the section would be quite small or unnecessary if a character has minimal feats, but Haki is still a very "notable technique."
What did you decide?Also this can be added now
For the topic of notable attacks, me and Damage talked about it offsite
Basically (correct me if i'm wrong) we're planning on adding Haki in the NA&T section for those who have feats with each specific color of haki, and those without feats don't get it put in the sectionThis seems to make sense to me.
What did you decide?
nada, just means that he can use it while unconscious, but instinctive reaction isn't just 1 time unconscious uses, it's usually like unconscious sentienceSince Luffy could use Haoshoku Haki even while unconscious in Chapter 924, would that grants Haoshoku Haki Instinctive Reaction
Basically (correct me if i'm wrong) we're planning on adding Haki in the NA&T section for those who have feats with each specific color of haki, and those without feats don't get it put in the section
I disagree, the One Piece wiki does the same thing and doesn't seem to suffer from that problem. If needed something like "(also known as armament haki)" could appear on the profiles in the Notable Attacks/techniques section.Just a thought but is Kenbunshoku and Busoshoku really better to use on the profiles than Observation and Armament?
Generally speaking I think we should be using the English translations where we can, especially for terminology like this where we want to make it clear to anyone visiting the pages who may not know One Piece well.
I disagree, the One Piece wiki does the same thing and doesn't seem to suffer from that problem.
An issue I've noticed with using the English is it takes more space on the profile; saying Armament Haki compared to just Busoshoku while not a major difference does get tedious if a profile's statistics mentions it a bunch of times.
Thought of that, but then it creates confusion as Armament and Observation are regular words on their own with their own meanings besides haki.Actually the difference would be changing "Busoshoku" to "Armament". It's actually 1 less letter.
Didn't claim we were, but regardless they use the Japanese for the terminology and don't seem to suffer the problems you're mentioning.We're not the OP Wiki
Didn't claim we were, but regardless they use the Japanese for the terminology and don't seem to suffer the problems you're mentioning.
Plus for the sake of space like mentioned on the page currently Busoshoku, Kenbunshoku and Haoshoku are also abbreviated to Buso, Kenbun and Hao.
Thought of that, but then it creates confusion as Armament and Observation are regular words on their own with their own meanings besides haki.
I never said it was a case of limited space. The issue is that many profiles are insanely bloated and hard to read, Luffy for example due to all his gears has this issue despite only having three keys currently (which is inevitably going to increase), it's better to save space where you can to solve this issue.We're not so limited in space that we need to abbreviate these Japanese terms even further.
As the page's name, but you'll notice throughout the page they'll just refer it to Busoshoku.Well, the OP wiki actually uses "Busoshoku Haki" instead of just "Busoshoku" like you're suggesting
I meant on other character's pages.As the page's name, but you'll notice throughout the page they'll just refer it to Busoshoku.
You're right, but I still prefer the Japanese terms as they can be abbreviated further in the stats section.Either way, that's no different to us using "Armament" or "Observation" which when capitalized is referring to a proper term and not the generic word.
Using the original is better in this scenario, as it's cleanerJust a thought but is Kenbunshoku and Busoshoku really better to use on the profiles than Observation and Armament?
That's what we have the Haki page for, to define those terms for those who may not understandGenerally speaking I think we should be using the English translations where we can, especially for terminology like this where we want to make it clear to anyone visiting the pages who may not know One Piece well.
It's moreso for the Powers & Abilities section I'm thinking of.How about simply writing "Busoshoku/Armament Haki" at the start of that section, for example?
Haki (Advanced Haoshoku, Advanced Kenbunshoku, Advanced Busoshoku)
Haki (Advanced Conqueror's Haki, Advanced Observation Haki, Advanced Armament Haki)
I'm still struggling to see how this is clearer to those with little knowledge on the series.It's not as condensed, but it's instantly a lot clearer as to the types of Haki than having to look them up.
And if someone knows nothing of One Piece what difference does it make if their first time reading up on the pages is Armament Haki or Busoshoku.
Why's this an issue? Bleach's terminology section has the original names, then adds the english literal translation as well. Just leave it the same for OP? The original names roll off the tongue easier anyway.