I don't care. As far as I'm concerned, I'm seeing wank of a ridiculous degree. Comparing a feat on the level of
this, with a feat on the level of
this, and assuming they must be equal based on zero real evidence just to upgrade Zoro's lifting strength? Do you think that if you stacked all of the rubble of Dressorsa onto a huge pile that Zoro would be able to pick it up and lift it casually?
I think it's a fact that the majority of the feats of the verse are well below what you would rate them as, and the average portrayal of these characters is not as high as what you'd argue for.
Tetsuo from Akira can use telekinesis on a level powerful enough to blow a massive crater on the Moon. He can also use telekinesis to simply crush a tank. But I would not say "He must have crushed the tank with Continent levels of force because his telekinesis can be that strong." It's the same principle here. Fujitora's feat of lifting all of the rubble on Dressrosa is not a justification to backscale to every single other feat by Fujitora and say that they must be the same.