- 2,047
- 778
It doesn't matter. Natsu can't burn something he's never been shown to burn. You can say he can burn a attacks with sub atomic hax because he's burnt a existence erasure move.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Natsu Dragneel vs Sailor Mars
- Thread starter Scarletmoon56
- Start date
- 21,390
- 2,978
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Power_Nullification
You don't have to power null every hax in existence to be able to say that you can power null things that don't have resistane to power null.
You don't have to power null every hax in existence to be able to say that you can power null things that don't have resistane to power null.
- 2,047
- 778
That's typically the rule. It goes by statements over feats, the Burden of Proof is on you to prove he can do that
- 6,014
- 2,122
I will be unavailable so this is probably my last message here Sowyƒÿó
he Don't have absorbed these but powernull them and in my case, he didn't really have absorbed flame who "bypass Dura" via another destructive effect
he Don't have absorbed these but powernull them and in my case, he didn't really have absorbed flame who "bypass Dura" via another destructive effect
- 21,390
- 2,978
Not for hax. If someone does not have resistance to hax, then they're going to be effected by it. Goku would be effected by conceptual manipulation, Polnareff can't move in time stop, etc.Rin The Dragon Empress said:
- 2,047
- 778
Sorry meant that vice versa.
- 21,390
- 2,978
What do you mean then? If the fire doesn't resist being absorbed then it gets absorbed.
- 20,085
- 10,872
That's not how it works. It's a NLF to assume that natsu can eat any form of Fire that has FAR deadlier properties than any other flame he's capable eating, especially when he's shown to struggle eating other types of flames without exhausting himself
- 21,390
- 2,978
What's deadly about the spatial destruction?
- 20,085
- 10,872
Destroys beyond conventional stuff. It's practically durability negation.
- 21,390
- 2,978
Not really. Acnologia destroyed a dimension with his fists, that doesn't mean he negates durability.
- 1,072
- 103
- Thread starter
- #92
Garg started the grace period more than 24 hours ago. Grace over ~ ƒÖŃÅ╗Gargoyle One said:
Similar threads
