Natsu Dragneel vs Sailor Mars

[Rin_The_Dragon_Empress]

It doesn't matter. Natsu can't burn something he's never been shown to burn. You can say he can burn a attacks with sub atomic hax because he's burnt a existence erasure move.

 

[DragonEmperor23]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Power_Nullification

You don't have to power null every hax in existence to be able to say that you can power null things that don't have resistane to power null.

 

[Rin_The_Dragon_Empress]

That's typically the rule. It goes by statements over feats, the Burden of Proof is on you to prove he can do that

 

[The_Causality]

I will be unavailable so this is probably my last message here Sowyƒÿó

he Don't have absorbed these but powernull them and in my case, he didn't really have absorbed flame who "bypass Dura" via another destructive effect

 

[DragonEmperor23]

That's typically the rule. It goes by statements over feats, the Burden of Proof is on you to prove he can do that

Not for hax. If someone does not have resistance to hax, then they're going to be effected by it. Goku would be effected by conceptual manipulation, Polnareff can't move in time stop, etc.

 

[Rin_The_Dragon_Empress]

Sorry meant that vice versa.

 

[DragonEmperor23]

What do you mean then? If the fire doesn't resist being absorbed then it gets absorbed.

 

[Theglassman12]

That's not how it works. It's a NLF to assume that natsu can eat any form of Fire that has FAR deadlier properties than any other flame he's capable eating, especially when he's shown to struggle eating other types of flames without exhausting himself

 

[DragonEmperor23]

What's deadly about the spatial destruction?

 

[Theglassman12]

Destroys beyond conventional stuff. It's practically durability negation.

 

[DragonEmperor23]

Not really. Acnologia destroyed a dimension with his fists, that doesn't mean he negates durability.

 

[Scarletmoon56]

Grace

Garg started the grace period more than 24 hours ago. Grace over ~ ƒÖŃÅ╗