- 5,411
- 6,218
"an even higher dimension of travel" Seems like quite a metaphorical way to exclaim that it's better than rayshifting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I personally blame Deagonx for that. Always stonewalling simple arguments. 3D dimensions encompassing an inf Higher D space? How can he even argue this without laughing?Further cementing the fact that nasu threads are a mess tbf.
Just make a new crt tbh or else no one would see your argument. This thread has been clogged up already.When I get home I'm gonna make a post about all the talked about points. I'm out eating with family
That's not my argument. It's just what the scan says. If you're arguing it's contradicted by other evidence, that doesn't change what the scan actually says.I personally blame Deagonx for that. Always stonewalling simple arguments. 3D dimensions encompassing an inf Higher D space? How can he even argue this without laughing?
Deagonx. Where do you think Sut Typhon scales? Above the universe or below a planet?That's not my argument. It's just what the scan says. If you're arguing it's contradicted by other evidence, that doesn't change what the scan actually says.
I might depending on how this goesJust make a new crt tbh or else no one would see your argument. This thread has been clogged up already.
This isn't the subject of the CRT.Deagonx. Where do you think Sut Typhon scales? Above the universe or below a planet?
Any thoughts about the currently accepted explanation, which avoids conflict?You're denying what can be plainly seen in the scan. Nothing subjective about it.
It actually is. Because the main reason Sut-Typhon scales above everyone else in the Nasuverse (excluding root), is because of him existing beyond six doors. So I would like to ask where you think he would rank if the six doors is just 3D.This isn't the subject of the CRT.
I don't think the statement is high 1-B actually.Any thoughts about the currently accepted explanation, which avoids conflict?
Good for you, that makes you a minority, but this is not what I am referring to.I don't think the statement is high 1-B actually.
The scan very clearly says otherwiseGood for you, that makes you a minority, but this is not what I am referring to.
I am referring to: The directions of the gates aren't meant to represent 3 dimensions, just the six gates themselves.
Please tag my man Deagonx and BestMGQ(Mr. Translator) and tell them.Makes sense by logic,
Actually, most people think it's infinite cardinal. It's just Deagon and friends ie, minorities that somehow think otherwise. Thanks btwthough seems like it hasn't been explicitly mentioned therefore most users probably aren't gonna agree it's an infinite cardinal of axis
What about with Executor's translation?The scan very clearly says otherwise
The Six doors, up and down, left and right, front and back, all of space, that is what they mean. |
But there are six gates and six directions. That's pretty obviously the amount.It's not because there are 3 directions, he just gave specific directions as examples to show that these spaces represent directions
Six directions for what Deagonx? What do you think the six doors represents? It represents all the directions of space in the universe. 3D doesn't even make sense. The planet is not even 3D. It's 6D, which means you can't even lowball the six doors below the planets. You are so hung up on the 3D stuff that you are refusing to see through the context.But there are six gates and six directions. That's pretty obviously the amount.
up down left right front back...It represents all the directions of space in the universe.
What I said is less about translation and more about what is common to see in works that deal with the metaphysical and abstract. It's very common to use mundane words to describe more than what the words themselves say.sorry to ping you brobut can we stop acting like this doesn't exist? bro gave us very clear clarification on how it could be interpreted, and as far as I know, he is a very good and trustworthy translator. we shouldn't even be going back and forth about whether or not it's talking about spatial dimensions, because the raws clearly say otherwise
Yes because it literally says it represents all space in the universe. How about you check Abigail's profile and look at her justifications first before making me repeat the same thing over and over again.up down left right front back...
I find it more weird you think 6 doors represent infinite directions...
Yes. The directions of up, down, left, right, forward, and backward. Three spatial dimensions.It represents all the directions of space in the universe
You're arguing the scan is contradicted by other evidence. That doesn't change what the scan says.3D doesn't even make sense. The planet is not even 3D. It's 6D, which means you can't even lowball the six doors below the planets
Look at her objectively incorrect justification?Yes because it literally says it represents all space in the universe. How about you check Abigail's profile and look at her justifications first before making me repeat the same thing over and over again.
The claim that those scans are High 1-B? I don't agree with that. But it hasn't been approved yet as it hasn't been determined as applying to anythingPlease let us know @Deagonx when you reach an evaluation with the currently accepted interpretation.
For example, is it:
- Coherent
- Incoherent
Let's goooI found evidence that Yog's gates can reach higher dimensions if thats helpful
Higher spatial dimensions or just higher dimensions?I found evidence that Yog's gates can reach higher dimensions if thats helpful
If you want to replace something, we should look at what is being replaced.Why is the "currently accepted interpretation" being treated as gospel when this whole site revolves around changing what's "currently accepted interpretation"?
No. I would appreciate doing your best to keep attention.The claim that those scans are High 1-B? I don't agree with that. But it hasn't been approved yet as it hasn't been determined as applying to anything
The Six doors, up and down, left and right, front and back, all of space, that is what they mean. |
Then I'd appreciate an appropriate level of specificity when you ask me something. I'm replying to many people at once and I cannot read your mind, do you understand?No. I would appreciate doing your best to keep attention.
To make such an argument you would need to believe it is a coincidence that it is six gates and six directions, which is not something I would agree with at all.The position that: The directions of the gates aren't meant to represent 3 dimensions, just the six gates themselves.
Which is based on a translation similar to this:
As Executor explained in detail, it is regular symbology. There is no issue with coherency raised.To make such an argument you would need to believe it is a coincidence that it is six gates and six directions, which is not something I would agree with at all.
The one that conforms to what the scan actually tells us. I will not endorse sweeping half the text under the rug and pretending it's a matter of interpretation.Would you say the first one is preferable?