• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Naruto to Boruto Discussion Thread

Arc7Kuroi said:
An exponential increase isn’t inherently at least e^1 which is where 2.71 comes from I believe. So no it’s not at least 2.71x
Click to expand...
I’ve never heard of sub-e^1 exponents, or maybe I just been out of school for too long. I opted out of Trig after all… 🤷‍♂️
 
2.71 is not exponential. Exponential doesn't just mean e^x, it can also be 2^x, or 3^x or any number for the base just as how you can choose any number for the exponent.
 
MeiouHades said:
2.71 is not exponential. Exponential doesn't just mean e^x, it can also be 2^x, or 3^x or any number for the base just as how you can choose any number for the exponent.
Click to expand...
2.71 iirc is the exponential constant. Base Numbers inform the equation but has nothing to do with that constant. Again, iirc.
 
TFO said:
2.71 iirc is the exponential constant. Base Numbers inform the equation but has nothing to do with that constant. Again, iirc.
Click to expand...
It comes from an approximation yes, also called Euler's number, but it is in no way the exponent when you talk about exponential anything
 
MeiouHades said:
It comes from an approximation yes, also called Euler's number, but it is in no way the exponent when you talk about exponential anything
Click to expand...
Pretty sure this is a massive misunderstanding on your part, ESPECIALLY in context, but… 🤷‍♂️

Either way, this scaling was rejected a few years ago anyways. So its pointless in discussing. At this point, you’re just nitpicking what you “think” is wrong and making a mountain out of it.
 
TFO said:
Pretty sure this is a massive misunderstanding on your part, ESPECIALLY in context, but… 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
My friend, how can I misunderstand what the Euler's number is when I can even derive it myself while you probably cannot (unless you learned it)?
 
MeiouHades said:
My friend, how can I misunderstand what the Euler's number is when I can even derive it myself while you probably cannot (unless you learned it)?
Click to expand...
Unfortunately you’re misunderstanding something even more basic than even that, and in more than one way, but I digress. You may want to also curb your assumptions about others as well (Or not, do what floats your boat).

The last thing I feel like doing rn is arguing ones understanding of mathematical concepts and reasoning in this regard. It quite literally doesn’t change all that much ANYWAYS regarding the verse at this point.
 
TFO said:
Unfortunately you’re misunderstanding something even more basic than even that, and in more than one way, but I digress. You may want to also curb your assumptions about others as well (Or not, do what floats your boat).
Click to expand...
Explain it then. Could've used that message space to explain what I was missing instead of typing a nothingburger

TFO said:
The last thing I feel like doing rn is arguing ones understanding of mathematical concepts and reasoning in this regard. It quite literally doesn’t change all that much ANYWAYS regarding the verse at this point.
Click to expand...
I never said it'd change anything or that I expect it to, I just showed why one reason it might not get accepted is because "exponential" can mean infinitely many values (quite literally) and that counter-argument would probably used to reject it
 
How about this?


IigUz.jpg
 
Y’all think Boruto is gonna go the way of Hachimaru? Die and then Ascend to Shibai status “somehow” and come back in God Mode?
 
MinatoSparkle said:
Probably should've mentioned it before but in the anime Jigen is just outright stated to be at 10%, so it's consistent for him to be near that level in the manga.
main-qimg-7477cfa9d7bea0e114fa4e71396f70a0
Click to expand...
A little different from the manga where they state he is below 10% but you can argue anime just retcons it and this is more quantifiable anyways

Maybe it's a mistranslation in the manga?

Imma see if I can find the raws in a bit
 
MinatoSparkle said:
Probably should've mentioned it before but in the anime Jigen is just outright stated to be at 10%, so it's consistent for him to be near that level in the manga.
main-qimg-7477cfa9d7bea0e114fa4e71396f70a0
Click to expand...
No, I'd take the manga over the anime, lol.

But, if the manga was a mistranslation and also says 10%, then IDM making him Low 5-B for that reason. I'll try looking for the raws
 
Nierre said:
No, I'd take the manga over the anime, lol.

But, if the manga was a mistranslation and also says 10%, then IDM making him Low 5-B for that reason. I'll try looking for the raws
Click to expand...
It adds support to the idea that Jigen's not supposed to be at like 0.3% or less 🤷‍♂️
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

HelloThere1089
Naruto/Boruto character with the best BIQ feats
Replies
23
Views
2K
karo_senpaii
karo_senpaii
Apollonir.Scale
Naruto Hax Upgrading
2 3
Replies
119
Views
11K
Arc7Kuroi
Arc7Kuroi
RanaProGamer
Fixing the Naruto Storm Scaling Chain
Replies
26
Views
3K
RanaProGamer
RanaProGamer
Godernet
  • Locked
Hags and Kags being Divas (Naruto CRT)
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
Godernet
Godernet
sageof8paths
  • Locked
My expansive truth seeking balls of steel
Replies
24
Views
1K
Damage3245
Damage3245
Back
Top