- 2,186
- 1,291
She's a great character. Simple but great.???
That's not, like... any better?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She's a great character. Simple but great.???
That's not, like... any better?
Okay, buddy. Off to the gulag with you!She's a great character
But she's also not badHinata is just not a great character. Like simmer down Tdjwo2
The Mantle Of Mrkship is not found It is earned. ~ The Mrk PrimesThat mantle isn't thrown around, it's earned. One needs to make 6 threads trying to upgrade Hinata to tier 5 for like being able to slap Kawaki or sumn.
But she's also not bad
EhhhhhhhhhhhhhhBut she's also not bad
What about Kushina?Yeah Ion rlly think a lot of the female characters are bad in my opinion
Tsunade, Chiyo, Ino, Sakura - great
Konan, Temari and Hinata - needed more time/spotlight but aren't bad
Karin and Mei - Definitely need rewrites/actual development cause the seeds are there but not much is done with it
That's basically it
The rest are side characters I couldn't care less about how well they're written
You right she is bad, just not as a characterEhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Kushina's super underdeveloped imo. She's awesome, but we almost ever see her outside of her interactions with her son or husband.What about Kushina?
I wouldn't joke about Tier 5 Hinata, she canonically survived a fight with Momoshiki.That mantle isn't thrown around, it's earned. One needs to make 6 threads trying to upgrade Hinata to tier 5 for like being able to slap Kawaki or sumn.
**** I KNEW I WAS FORGETTING SOMEONEWhat about Kushina?
kaguya was good, people have contentions in her timing, without that shes solid,Those characters aren't oversexualized, boobs exist irl, believe it or not.
You brought up KAGUYA.
R u reading the colored version?Starting.
I've never really read Naruto's manga, only watched the anime, and that was a long time ago, so this is really gonna be a new experience for me.
I have said similar things about my goatI think Kushina was great too
She was dead so there wasn't a lot of opening for character development. Besides, not every character needs development.
It's like saying Hagoromo is badly written because he showed up for like 5 chapters and dipped. When that was the whole purpose for his character
You can't be badly written as a character if you serve the purpose you were intended to serve. A lot of critics simply can't decipher the purpose of a character and as a result, say a character (Shino for example) is badly written.
MmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmI don't do character/plot analysis btw. I simply rate characters/verses based off my own enjoyment. Probably explains why I like Korra (or TLOK in general) more than Aang.
Honestly I feel like for the most part you don’t get PoG level brain dead criticisms anymore, people seem to be tending far more to the positive with their analysis of Naruto. Obviously there’s still brain dead level takes out there, and maybe it’s just cuz I surround myself with intelligent people, but the past few years of Naruto dialogue surrounding its storytelling have been mostly positive for me. Series is an easy 9/10 for me, so maybe I’m suffering from confirmation bias here but oh well.it's tragic that naruto is plagued with an audience that cant help but trash talk it's charactersand writing too
kishi deserves better smh
all the so called criticisms I've read in these 3-5 pages are dumb gripes that people never apply with any other series
Kushina of all people is NOT underdeveloped, she was a perfect character that concluded properly, people gotta stop complaining about needing extra extra with characters which when you ask them how theyd further the character they never produce anything substantial or compelling whatsoever cough cough dygoknight
And you were doing SO WELL until this line, too....Probably explains why I like Korra (or TLOK in general) more than Aang.
NoR u reading the colored version?
I think it's always been "mostly" positive, but yes the trend does seem to be rising in that sense. There are still far too many "Neji was right" and "The War Arc is a DBZ ripoff and has no strategy" ppl thoHonestly I feel like for the most part you don’t get PoG level brain dead criticisms anymore, people seem to be tending far more to the positive with their analysis of Naruto. Obviously there’s still brain dead level takes out there, and maybe it’s just cuz I surround myself with intelligent people, but the past few years of Naruto dialogue surrounding its storytelling have been mostly positive for me. Series is an easy 9/10 for me, so maybe I’m suffering from confirmation bias here but oh well.
I was literally gonna give a huge like until thatAnd you were doing SO WELL until this line, too....
Any particular reason?
I like my manga to be as close to the author's vision as possibleAny particular reason?
I said what I saidAnd you were doing SO WELL until this line, too....
I can’t co-sign this statement, but you’re still based for liking TLOKProbably explains why I like Korra (or TLOK in general) more than Aang.
Fair, tho I feel like manga being black and white is more of a time thing than specifically wanting it to be like that (given that it's drawn weekly and all)I like my manga to be as close to the author's vision as possible
Hinata victimI can’t co-sign this statement, but you’re still based for liking TLOK
I fw Korra too brotherI don't do character/plot analysis btw. I simply rate characters/verses based off my own enjoyment. Probably explains why I like Korra (or TLOK in general) more than Aang.
I'm pretty sure this is a game only statementI saw this after ETSO CRTs. In The Last movie poster, it is stated that Naruto and Sasuke together create the MOST POWERFUL ATTACK IN HISTORY. Right after this statement, it is stated that Naruto's strongest attack is Rasenshuriken and Sasuke's strongest attack is Amaterasu. If we accept the movie posters as canon, does it take a scale above Etso because it says the strongest in history? Or is it said that Etso cannot be interpreted as just an attack?
Drop the scanI saw this after ETSO CRTs. In The Last movie poster, it is stated that Naruto and Sasuke together create the MOST POWERFUL ATTACK IN HISTORY. Right after this statement, it is stated that Naruto's strongest attack is Rasenshuriken and Sasuke's strongest attack is Amaterasu. If we accept the movie posters as canon, does it take a scale above Etso because it says the strongest in history? Or is it said that Etso cannot be interpreted as just an attack?