- 21,469
- 30,790
UchihaSlayer96 said:
Additionally, SPSM Naruto from Part II fought Kaguya (to an extent), who's much superior to Toneri. Toneri is at best comparable to Hamura, who's weaker than Hagoromo, who's in turn weaker than Kaguya. It's really simple and widely accepted, so please let's not unnecessarily overcomplicate such a simple thing.
@OneBleachHurricane there is not a single reasoning on why Kaguya's superior to Toneri except "he should be comparable to her".
Hamura's comparable to Hagoromo who defeated Kaguya and sealed her.
Toneri has his power and the power of thousands of other Otsutsuki's sitting in his eye sockets, including Hamura.
Widely accepted ≠ Correct. We have a fallacy page for a reason, appeal to popularity is literally what these ratings are being based on.
All he said was "the fandom agrees with this, so let's leave it". The wiki is for accurate ratings, not fanmade ones.
SPSM Naruto sent her flying with punches and scales to Sasuke who made her bleed with regular Susanoo slashes
Baseless
What makes him weaker than Hamura?
AP wise? Baseless
All I'm hearing is "stronger". Kaguya was "stronger" than Naruto and Sasuke, but they could make her bleed and harm her.
We are talking about Attack Potency. Stop using "stronger" justifications, especially when the justification is a scaling chain full of people we've never seen fight.
Either find a statement or a feat that shows that Kaguya > Toneri ATTACK POTENCY WISE, not technique wise (switch dimensions, bones that make people crumble, truthseeking orbs with a shit ton of hax) and so on.
Enough with the headcanon and the "we already agreed" i don't care if you already agreed. This is flawed scaling, and using it because a lot of people agree is worst than an "Agree FRA" train.